使用干扰螺钉、镫骨和缝合锚可使改良的 Lemaire 外侧关节外腱鞘挛缩达到足够的破坏载荷:结构特性的生物力学研究。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1177/03635465241305739
Luke V Tollefson, Evan P Shoemaker, Erik L Slette, Mitchell Carlson, Robert F LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe, Andrew G Geeslin
{"title":"使用干扰螺钉、镫骨和缝合锚可使改良的 Lemaire 外侧关节外腱鞘挛缩达到足够的破坏载荷:结构特性的生物力学研究。","authors":"Luke V Tollefson, Evan P Shoemaker, Erik L Slette, Mitchell Carlson, Robert F LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe, Andrew G Geeslin","doi":"10.1177/03635465241305739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is increasingly being utilized to augment an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because it has been shown to reduce the risk of postreconstruction graft failure or recurrent rotatory instability. Various femoral fixation techniques are available, including the use of an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine and compare the biomechanical properties of an LET graft when using an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor for the femoral fixation for a modified Lemaire LET.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were obtained and randomly assigned via a random group generator to undergo a modified Lemaire LET using either an interference screw, a staple, or a suture anchor for femoral fixation. The specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 20 mm/min until graft failure. The maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode for each specimen were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean failure load was highest for the interference screw (252.7 ± 131.2 N), followed by the staple (151.8 ± 34.1 N) and the suture anchor (105.7 ± 16.4 N). There was a significant difference in failure load between the interference screw and the suture anchor (<i>P</i> = .015). There was no significant difference between the staple and the interference screw (<i>P</i> = .101) or the suture anchor (<i>P</i> = .577). There was no significant difference in graft stiffness across all fixation methods (<i>P</i> = .089).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 3 femoral fixation methods achieved adequate failure loads, although the interference screw had a greater failure load than the suture anchor and there was no significant difference between these implants and the staple. There were no significant differences in stiffness between the fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The maximum failure load occurred with an interference screw for femoral fixation of a modified Lemaire LET; however, because of socket size, this implant may be at greater risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel collision compared to a smaller-diameter suture anchor drill hole. The failure load of the suture anchor was the lowest; however, it appears sufficient for stable fixation based on the force experienced by an LET graft reported in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"327-332"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adequate Failure Loads for Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Are Achieved With an Interference Screw, Staple, and Suture Anchor: A Biomechanical Study of Structural Properties.\",\"authors\":\"Luke V Tollefson, Evan P Shoemaker, Erik L Slette, Mitchell Carlson, Robert F LaPrade, Lars Engebretsen, Gilbert Moatshe, Andrew G Geeslin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241305739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is increasingly being utilized to augment an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because it has been shown to reduce the risk of postreconstruction graft failure or recurrent rotatory instability. Various femoral fixation techniques are available, including the use of an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine and compare the biomechanical properties of an LET graft when using an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor for the femoral fixation for a modified Lemaire LET.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Controlled laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were obtained and randomly assigned via a random group generator to undergo a modified Lemaire LET using either an interference screw, a staple, or a suture anchor for femoral fixation. The specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 20 mm/min until graft failure. The maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode for each specimen were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean failure load was highest for the interference screw (252.7 ± 131.2 N), followed by the staple (151.8 ± 34.1 N) and the suture anchor (105.7 ± 16.4 N). There was a significant difference in failure load between the interference screw and the suture anchor (<i>P</i> = .015). There was no significant difference between the staple and the interference screw (<i>P</i> = .101) or the suture anchor (<i>P</i> = .577). There was no significant difference in graft stiffness across all fixation methods (<i>P</i> = .089).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 3 femoral fixation methods achieved adequate failure loads, although the interference screw had a greater failure load than the suture anchor and there was no significant difference between these implants and the staple. There were no significant differences in stiffness between the fixation methods.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The maximum failure load occurred with an interference screw for femoral fixation of a modified Lemaire LET; however, because of socket size, this implant may be at greater risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel collision compared to a smaller-diameter suture anchor drill hole. The failure load of the suture anchor was the lowest; however, it appears sufficient for stable fixation based on the force experienced by an LET graft reported in the literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"327-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241305739\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241305739","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)越来越多地被用于前交叉韧带重建,因为它已被证明可以降低重建后移植物失败或复发性旋转不稳定的风险。可采用多种股骨固定技术,包括使用干涉螺钉、钉钉或缝合锚钉。目的:确定并比较使用干涉螺钉、钉钉或缝合锚钉固定改良Lemaire假体股骨时假体移植物的生物力学特性。研究设计:实验室对照研究。方法:获得18例新鲜冷冻的尸体膝关节,通过随机分组发电机随机分配,使用干涉螺钉、钉钉或缝合锚钉进行改良Lemaire LET固定。试样以20mm /min的速度进行加载-失效试验,直至接枝失效。记录每个试件的最大破坏载荷、刚度和破坏模式。结果:干扰螺钉的平均失效载荷最高(252.7±131.2 N),其次是钉钉(151.8±34.1 N)和缝线锚钉(105.7±16.4 N),干扰螺钉和缝线锚钉的失效载荷差异有统计学意义(P = 0.015)。钉钉与干涉螺钉(P = 0.101)或缝合锚钉(P = 0.577)无显著差异。所有固定方法的移植物刚度无显著差异(P = 0.089)。结论:3种股骨内固定方法均获得足够的失效载荷,但干涉螺钉的失效载荷大于缝合锚钉,且与钉钉无显著性差异。两种固定方法的刚度无显著差异。临床相关性:最大失效负荷发生在改良Lemaire LET股骨内固定干涉螺钉时;然而,由于窝的大小,与直径较小的缝合锚钉钻孔相比,这种植入物可能有更大的前交叉韧带重建隧道碰撞风险。缝线锚的破坏载荷最低;然而,根据文献报道的LET移植物所经历的力,它似乎足以稳定固定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adequate Failure Loads for Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Are Achieved With an Interference Screw, Staple, and Suture Anchor: A Biomechanical Study of Structural Properties.

Background: A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is increasingly being utilized to augment an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because it has been shown to reduce the risk of postreconstruction graft failure or recurrent rotatory instability. Various femoral fixation techniques are available, including the use of an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor.

Purpose: To determine and compare the biomechanical properties of an LET graft when using an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor for the femoral fixation for a modified Lemaire LET.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were obtained and randomly assigned via a random group generator to undergo a modified Lemaire LET using either an interference screw, a staple, or a suture anchor for femoral fixation. The specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 20 mm/min until graft failure. The maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode for each specimen were recorded.

Results: The mean failure load was highest for the interference screw (252.7 ± 131.2 N), followed by the staple (151.8 ± 34.1 N) and the suture anchor (105.7 ± 16.4 N). There was a significant difference in failure load between the interference screw and the suture anchor (P = .015). There was no significant difference between the staple and the interference screw (P = .101) or the suture anchor (P = .577). There was no significant difference in graft stiffness across all fixation methods (P = .089).

Conclusion: All 3 femoral fixation methods achieved adequate failure loads, although the interference screw had a greater failure load than the suture anchor and there was no significant difference between these implants and the staple. There were no significant differences in stiffness between the fixation methods.

Clinical relevance: The maximum failure load occurred with an interference screw for femoral fixation of a modified Lemaire LET; however, because of socket size, this implant may be at greater risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel collision compared to a smaller-diameter suture anchor drill hole. The failure load of the suture anchor was the lowest; however, it appears sufficient for stable fixation based on the force experienced by an LET graft reported in the literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Revision and Primary Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation at Midterm Follow-up: Patient Reported Outcomes, Survivorship, and Reoperation Rates. Primary Fixation and Cyclic Performance of Posterior Horn Medial Meniscus Root Repair With Knotless Adjustable Suture Anchor-Based Fixation: A Human Biomechanical Evaluation Over 100,000 Loading Cycles. Association Between Global Overcoverage and Long-term Survivorship, Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown, and Reduced Joint Space Width: Minimum 8-Year Follow-up. Restriction of Posterior Tibial Translation During the Posterior Drawer Test in Internal or External Rotation Is Dependent on Peripheral Stabilizers of the Knee: A Biomechanical Robotic Investigation. Serial Changes in Muscle Strength and Dynamic Balance After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 55 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1