根据基线认知功能和其他2型糖尿病患者亚群,随机降压治疗和强化血糖控制对痴呆和认知能力下降的影响:ADVANCE试验的结果

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100372
Katie Harris, Jessica Gong, Stephen MacMahon, Ying Xu, Sultana Shajahan, Stephen Harrap, Neil Poulter, Michel Marre, Pavel Hamet, Giuseppe Mancia, Craig Anderson, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers
{"title":"根据基线认知功能和其他2型糖尿病患者亚群,随机降压治疗和强化血糖控制对痴呆和认知能力下降的影响:ADVANCE试验的结果","authors":"Katie Harris, Jessica Gong, Stephen MacMahon, Ying Xu, Sultana Shajahan, Stephen Harrap, Neil Poulter, Michel Marre, Pavel Hamet, Giuseppe Mancia, Craig Anderson, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Accumulating evidence indicates that reducing high blood pressure (BP) prevents dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, although diabetes is a risk factor for dementia and MCI, there is uncertainty of the effect of intensive glucose control on these endpoints. This study aimed to determine the effects of BP-lowering (vs placebo) and intensive glucose-lowering (vs standard control) treatments according to baseline cognition and other characteristics on dementia and cognitive decline (CD) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial involved 11,140 individuals with T2DM. The effects of BP-lowering and intensive glucose-lowering treatments were explored in subgroups of baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), categorised as cognitively normal (scores ≥28) and cognitive impairment (scores <28). The primary outcome was a composite of dementia/CD that accounted for the competing risk of death. Multinomial regression models, adjusted for common cardiovascular risk factors, were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the effects of the treatments on dementia/CD. Homogeneity of effects by subgroups were evaluated using interaction terms in the models. A two-sided p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BP-lowering treatment (vs. placebo) was associated with a lower odds of dementia/CD in participants with cognitive impairment (OR 0.76, 95 % CI (0.59-0.99)) but not in those cognitively normal (OR 1.05, 95 % CI (0.92-1.21); p for interaction 0.03). Those with a history of cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome did not experience a benefit of active BP lowering treatment compared with placebo on dementia/CD. There were no further subgroup effects of BP-lowering treatment. The effect of intensive glucose lowering (vs standard control) on the odds of dementia/CD did not vary by baseline cognition subgroup. However, it did vary by level of blood glucose at baseline (<7.9 mmol/L OR 1.12, 95 % CI (0.96-1.30) vs ≥ 7.9 mmol/L 0.87 (0.75-1.00); p for interaction 0.02) and duration of T2DM (<10 years OR 0.92 (0.81-1.05) vs ≥10 years 1.16 (0.97-1.38); p for interaction 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests greater effects of BP-lowering treatment in those with early loss of cognitive function than in those cognitively normal. There were also differential effects of intensive glucose-lowering on dementia and CD according to levels of blood glucose and duration of diabetes in people with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ADVANCE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT00145925.</p>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"8 ","pages":"100372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial.\",\"authors\":\"Katie Harris, Jessica Gong, Stephen MacMahon, Ying Xu, Sultana Shajahan, Stephen Harrap, Neil Poulter, Michel Marre, Pavel Hamet, Giuseppe Mancia, Craig Anderson, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Accumulating evidence indicates that reducing high blood pressure (BP) prevents dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, although diabetes is a risk factor for dementia and MCI, there is uncertainty of the effect of intensive glucose control on these endpoints. This study aimed to determine the effects of BP-lowering (vs placebo) and intensive glucose-lowering (vs standard control) treatments according to baseline cognition and other characteristics on dementia and cognitive decline (CD) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial involved 11,140 individuals with T2DM. The effects of BP-lowering and intensive glucose-lowering treatments were explored in subgroups of baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), categorised as cognitively normal (scores ≥28) and cognitive impairment (scores <28). The primary outcome was a composite of dementia/CD that accounted for the competing risk of death. Multinomial regression models, adjusted for common cardiovascular risk factors, were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the effects of the treatments on dementia/CD. Homogeneity of effects by subgroups were evaluated using interaction terms in the models. A two-sided p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BP-lowering treatment (vs. placebo) was associated with a lower odds of dementia/CD in participants with cognitive impairment (OR 0.76, 95 % CI (0.59-0.99)) but not in those cognitively normal (OR 1.05, 95 % CI (0.92-1.21); p for interaction 0.03). Those with a history of cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome did not experience a benefit of active BP lowering treatment compared with placebo on dementia/CD. There were no further subgroup effects of BP-lowering treatment. The effect of intensive glucose lowering (vs standard control) on the odds of dementia/CD did not vary by baseline cognition subgroup. However, it did vary by level of blood glucose at baseline (<7.9 mmol/L OR 1.12, 95 % CI (0.96-1.30) vs ≥ 7.9 mmol/L 0.87 (0.75-1.00); p for interaction 0.02) and duration of T2DM (<10 years OR 0.92 (0.81-1.05) vs ≥10 years 1.16 (0.97-1.38); p for interaction 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests greater effects of BP-lowering treatment in those with early loss of cognitive function than in those cognitively normal. There were also differential effects of intensive glucose-lowering on dementia and CD according to levels of blood glucose and duration of diabetes in people with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ADVANCE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT00145925.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"100372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699603/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:越来越多的证据表明,降低高血压(BP)可以预防痴呆和轻度认知障碍(MCI)。此外,虽然糖尿病是痴呆和轻度认知障碍的危险因素,但强化血糖控制对这些终点的影响尚不确定。本研究旨在根据基线认知和其他特征确定降压(相对于安慰剂)和强化降糖(相对于标准对照)治疗对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者痴呆和认知能力下降(CD)的影响。方法:在糖尿病和血管疾病中的作用:Preterax和Diamicron改良释放控制评价(ADVANCE)试验纳入11,140例T2DM患者。在基线迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)的亚组中,研究了降压和强化降糖治疗的效果,分为认知正常(评分≥28)和认知障碍(评分结果:降压治疗(与安慰剂相比)与认知障碍参与者的痴呆/CD发生率较低相关(OR 0.76, 95% CI(0.59-0.99)),但与认知正常参与者无关(OR 1.05, 95% CI (0.92-1.21);P为相互作用0.03)。与安慰剂相比,那些有心肾代谢综合征病史的患者在痴呆/CD方面没有得到主动降压治疗的益处。降压治疗没有进一步的亚组效应。强化降糖(与标准对照)对痴呆/CD几率的影响在基线认知亚组中没有变化。然而,它确实因基线血糖水平而异(结论:这项研究表明,与认知功能正常的人相比,早期认知功能丧失的人降压治疗的效果更大。根据2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平和糖尿病病程,强化降糖对痴呆和CD的影响也存在差异。临床试验注册:ADVANCE在ClinicalTrials.gov注册:编号NCT00145925。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial.

Background and aims: Accumulating evidence indicates that reducing high blood pressure (BP) prevents dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, although diabetes is a risk factor for dementia and MCI, there is uncertainty of the effect of intensive glucose control on these endpoints. This study aimed to determine the effects of BP-lowering (vs placebo) and intensive glucose-lowering (vs standard control) treatments according to baseline cognition and other characteristics on dementia and cognitive decline (CD) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial involved 11,140 individuals with T2DM. The effects of BP-lowering and intensive glucose-lowering treatments were explored in subgroups of baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), categorised as cognitively normal (scores ≥28) and cognitive impairment (scores <28). The primary outcome was a composite of dementia/CD that accounted for the competing risk of death. Multinomial regression models, adjusted for common cardiovascular risk factors, were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the effects of the treatments on dementia/CD. Homogeneity of effects by subgroups were evaluated using interaction terms in the models. A two-sided p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results: BP-lowering treatment (vs. placebo) was associated with a lower odds of dementia/CD in participants with cognitive impairment (OR 0.76, 95 % CI (0.59-0.99)) but not in those cognitively normal (OR 1.05, 95 % CI (0.92-1.21); p for interaction 0.03). Those with a history of cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome did not experience a benefit of active BP lowering treatment compared with placebo on dementia/CD. There were no further subgroup effects of BP-lowering treatment. The effect of intensive glucose lowering (vs standard control) on the odds of dementia/CD did not vary by baseline cognition subgroup. However, it did vary by level of blood glucose at baseline (<7.9 mmol/L OR 1.12, 95 % CI (0.96-1.30) vs ≥ 7.9 mmol/L 0.87 (0.75-1.00); p for interaction 0.02) and duration of T2DM (<10 years OR 0.92 (0.81-1.05) vs ≥10 years 1.16 (0.97-1.38); p for interaction 0.04).

Conclusions: This study suggests greater effects of BP-lowering treatment in those with early loss of cognitive function than in those cognitively normal. There were also differential effects of intensive glucose-lowering on dementia and CD according to levels of blood glucose and duration of diabetes in people with T2DM.

Clinical trial registration: ADVANCE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT00145925.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cumulative blood pressure load and cognitive decline in older adults: An observational analysis of two large cohorts. Where in the brain is human intelligence?. Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial. Editorial. CCCB: The journal at age 5. Brain health assessment. An exploratory review of tools related to its cognitive dimension
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1