[FACT-C调查对智利结直肠癌患者生活质量的专家验证]。

Daniel Moreno M, María Inés Gaete D, Jocelyn Morales-Verdejo, José Tomás Larach K, Gonzalo Urrejola S, María Elena Molina P, Rodrigo Miguieles C, Felipe Bellolio R
{"title":"[FACT-C调查对智利结直肠癌患者生活质量的专家验证]。","authors":"Daniel Moreno M, María Inés Gaete D, Jocelyn Morales-Verdejo, José Tomás Larach K, Gonzalo Urrejola S, María Elena Molina P, Rodrigo Miguieles C, Felipe Bellolio R","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000600655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Chile, there is limited information regarding the effects on the quality of life of patients undergoing colorectal resective surgery. Although the GES guideline of management of Colorectal Cancer (2013) includes a quality-of-life survey, presented in a non-translated version to Spanish, without instructions regarding its application method, and recently validated (2023). On the other hand, post-surgical and oncological follow-ups focus on evaluating symptoms, signs, and complementary tests associated with recurrences, leaving the non-standardized evaluation of quality of life to the discretion of the healthcare provider. Therefore, the need arises for a standardized instrument that evaluates the quality of life of patients diagnosed, treated, and monitored for colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This article presents and discusses the results of the content validation of the FACT-C survey by experts from the colorectal surgery team of the UC-Christus Health Network for its application in Chilean patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (in a second phase).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation was performed through an evaluation and calculation of the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) of each item using a Likert-type survey that evaluated their coherence, clarity, and relevance, as well as the sufficiency of each dimension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An average of CVCs above 0.9 were observed, wich means an excellent an average of general CVCs above 0.9, which means an excellent correlation between the experts regarding the ability of the survey to measure quality of life. In addition, minor modifications were made to allow for a better understanding of four items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results affirm that the FACT-C survey has an excellent CVC, allowing us to continue with the next stage of the validation process in a sample of Chilean patients to ensure its applicability in our population.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 6","pages":"655-664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Expert Validation of the FACT-C Survey for Measuring Quality of Life in Chilean Patients Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Moreno M, María Inés Gaete D, Jocelyn Morales-Verdejo, José Tomás Larach K, Gonzalo Urrejola S, María Elena Molina P, Rodrigo Miguieles C, Felipe Bellolio R\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0034-98872024000600655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Chile, there is limited information regarding the effects on the quality of life of patients undergoing colorectal resective surgery. Although the GES guideline of management of Colorectal Cancer (2013) includes a quality-of-life survey, presented in a non-translated version to Spanish, without instructions regarding its application method, and recently validated (2023). On the other hand, post-surgical and oncological follow-ups focus on evaluating symptoms, signs, and complementary tests associated with recurrences, leaving the non-standardized evaluation of quality of life to the discretion of the healthcare provider. Therefore, the need arises for a standardized instrument that evaluates the quality of life of patients diagnosed, treated, and monitored for colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This article presents and discusses the results of the content validation of the FACT-C survey by experts from the colorectal surgery team of the UC-Christus Health Network for its application in Chilean patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (in a second phase).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation was performed through an evaluation and calculation of the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) of each item using a Likert-type survey that evaluated their coherence, clarity, and relevance, as well as the sufficiency of each dimension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An average of CVCs above 0.9 were observed, wich means an excellent an average of general CVCs above 0.9, which means an excellent correlation between the experts regarding the ability of the survey to measure quality of life. In addition, minor modifications were made to allow for a better understanding of four items.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results affirm that the FACT-C survey has an excellent CVC, allowing us to continue with the next stage of the validation process in a sample of Chilean patients to ensure its applicability in our population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":\"152 6\",\"pages\":\"655-664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000600655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000600655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在智利,关于结肠切除手术对患者生活质量的影响的信息有限。尽管GES结直肠癌管理指南(2013年)包括一项生活质量调查,以非翻译版本的西班牙语呈现,没有关于其应用方法的说明,并且最近得到了验证(2023年)。另一方面,术后和肿瘤随访侧重于评估与复发相关的症状、体征和补充检查,将生活质量的非标准化评估留给医疗保健提供者自行决定。因此,需要一种标准化的仪器来评估诊断、治疗和监测结直肠癌患者的生活质量。目的:本文介绍并讨论了UC-Christus健康网络结直肠外科团队的专家对FACT-C调查的内容验证结果,该调查将在智利诊断为结直肠癌的患者中应用(在第二阶段)。方法:通过评估和计算每个项目的内容效度系数(CVC)来进行验证,使用李克特式调查来评估它们的连贯性、清晰度和相关性,以及每个维度的充分性。结果:观察到的cvc平均值在0.9以上,这意味着一般cvc的平均值在0.9以上,这意味着专家之间对调查测量生活质量的能力有很好的相关性。此外,还作了一些小的修改,以便更好地了解四个项目。结论:我们的结果证实FACT-C调查具有出色的CVC,使我们能够在智利患者样本中继续进行下一阶段的验证过程,以确保其在我国人群中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Expert Validation of the FACT-C Survey for Measuring Quality of Life in Chilean Patients Diagnosed with Colorectal Cancer].

In Chile, there is limited information regarding the effects on the quality of life of patients undergoing colorectal resective surgery. Although the GES guideline of management of Colorectal Cancer (2013) includes a quality-of-life survey, presented in a non-translated version to Spanish, without instructions regarding its application method, and recently validated (2023). On the other hand, post-surgical and oncological follow-ups focus on evaluating symptoms, signs, and complementary tests associated with recurrences, leaving the non-standardized evaluation of quality of life to the discretion of the healthcare provider. Therefore, the need arises for a standardized instrument that evaluates the quality of life of patients diagnosed, treated, and monitored for colorectal cancer.

Aim: This article presents and discusses the results of the content validation of the FACT-C survey by experts from the colorectal surgery team of the UC-Christus Health Network for its application in Chilean patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (in a second phase).

Methods: Validation was performed through an evaluation and calculation of the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC) of each item using a Likert-type survey that evaluated their coherence, clarity, and relevance, as well as the sufficiency of each dimension.

Results: An average of CVCs above 0.9 were observed, wich means an excellent an average of general CVCs above 0.9, which means an excellent correlation between the experts regarding the ability of the survey to measure quality of life. In addition, minor modifications were made to allow for a better understanding of four items.

Conclusion: Our results affirm that the FACT-C survey has an excellent CVC, allowing us to continue with the next stage of the validation process in a sample of Chilean patients to ensure its applicability in our population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Another Lesson from the Pandemic: Supervisor Social Support for Mental Health Protection in Healthcare Workers, Chile]. [Chronic Insomnia: A Public Health Problem]. [Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice: Update on Indications, Complications, and Contraindications]. [Diversity and Institution: Scopes for Health Sciences Education]. [Duties of the Physician in Relation to the Use of Alternative and Complementary Medicines by Their Patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1