Kuan-Ting Lin , Shu-Yuan Pan , Mei-Hua Yuan , Yi-Ting Zhang , Horng-Yuh Guo
{"title":"水稻生产安全与土壤相关生态系统服务之间的协同作用:从实地观察到政策实施","authors":"Kuan-Ting Lin , Shu-Yuan Pan , Mei-Hua Yuan , Yi-Ting Zhang , Horng-Yuh Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agroecosystems provide crop provisioning service to support food security, as well as regulating services to maintain soil health. However, the relationships among ecosystem services (ES), rice production security, and soil attributes remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The study evaluates ecosystem services in a key rice production area and assesses factors such as productivity and soil conditions.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The study exemplifies a prominent rice-producing region in Taiwan and conducts three studies: (1) assessing and visualizing the status of land use, soil properties, and ecosystem services; (2) exploring the relationship between ES and environmental attributes; and (3) monetizing and analyzing the clustering of ES.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We visualize cropland ES including crop provision, soil carbon storage, water retention, nutrient retention, and soil erosion control. The relationship analysis indicates positive correlations between regulating services and crop productivity, as well as between soil carbon storage and soil conditions such as coarse texture and low drainage. It also highlights the importance of maintaining the agricultural environment and soil health. The valuation of cropland ES is estimated at US$16,400 per hectare per year, with soil carbon storage and water retention being the most significant contributors. Cluster analysis delineates spatial ES characteristics, guiding local sustainable management practices.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study highlights the critical role of soil ecosystem services in ensuring the synergies of food security and environmental sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"224 ","pages":"Article 104256"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergies between rice production security and soil-related ecosystem services: From field observations to policy implementations\",\"authors\":\"Kuan-Ting Lin , Shu-Yuan Pan , Mei-Hua Yuan , Yi-Ting Zhang , Horng-Yuh Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Agroecosystems provide crop provisioning service to support food security, as well as regulating services to maintain soil health. However, the relationships among ecosystem services (ES), rice production security, and soil attributes remain unclear.</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The study evaluates ecosystem services in a key rice production area and assesses factors such as productivity and soil conditions.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The study exemplifies a prominent rice-producing region in Taiwan and conducts three studies: (1) assessing and visualizing the status of land use, soil properties, and ecosystem services; (2) exploring the relationship between ES and environmental attributes; and (3) monetizing and analyzing the clustering of ES.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We visualize cropland ES including crop provision, soil carbon storage, water retention, nutrient retention, and soil erosion control. The relationship analysis indicates positive correlations between regulating services and crop productivity, as well as between soil carbon storage and soil conditions such as coarse texture and low drainage. It also highlights the importance of maintaining the agricultural environment and soil health. The valuation of cropland ES is estimated at US$16,400 per hectare per year, with soil carbon storage and water retention being the most significant contributors. Cluster analysis delineates spatial ES characteristics, guiding local sustainable management practices.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>This study highlights the critical role of soil ecosystem services in ensuring the synergies of food security and environmental sustainability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"224 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24004062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24004062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synergies between rice production security and soil-related ecosystem services: From field observations to policy implementations
CONTEXT
Agroecosystems provide crop provisioning service to support food security, as well as regulating services to maintain soil health. However, the relationships among ecosystem services (ES), rice production security, and soil attributes remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE
The study evaluates ecosystem services in a key rice production area and assesses factors such as productivity and soil conditions.
METHODS
The study exemplifies a prominent rice-producing region in Taiwan and conducts three studies: (1) assessing and visualizing the status of land use, soil properties, and ecosystem services; (2) exploring the relationship between ES and environmental attributes; and (3) monetizing and analyzing the clustering of ES.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
We visualize cropland ES including crop provision, soil carbon storage, water retention, nutrient retention, and soil erosion control. The relationship analysis indicates positive correlations between regulating services and crop productivity, as well as between soil carbon storage and soil conditions such as coarse texture and low drainage. It also highlights the importance of maintaining the agricultural environment and soil health. The valuation of cropland ES is estimated at US$16,400 per hectare per year, with soil carbon storage and water retention being the most significant contributors. Cluster analysis delineates spatial ES characteristics, guiding local sustainable management practices.
SIGNIFICANCE
This study highlights the critical role of soil ecosystem services in ensuring the synergies of food security and environmental sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.