通过机器学习预测混合人群大手术后死亡率:一种多目标符号回归方法

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1111/anae.16538
Pietro Arina, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, Ramani Moonesinghe, Vasa Curcin, Mervyn Singer, John Whittle, Evangelos B. Mazomenos
{"title":"通过机器学习预测混合人群大手术后死亡率:一种多目标符号回归方法","authors":"Pietro Arina, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, Ramani Moonesinghe, Vasa Curcin, Mervyn Singer, John Whittle, Evangelos B. Mazomenos","doi":"10.1111/anae.16538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SummaryIntroductionUnderstanding 1‐year mortality following major surgery offers valuable insights into patient outcomes and the quality of peri‐operative care. Few models exist that predict 1‐year mortality accurately. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing complex non‐cardiac surgery using a novel machine‐learning technique called multi‐objective symbolic regression.MethodsA single‐institution database of patients undergoing major elective surgery with previous cardiopulmonary exercise testing was divided into three datasets: pre‐operative clinical data; cardiorespiratory and physiological data; and combined. A multi‐objective symbolic regression model was developed and compared against existing models. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score. Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to identify the major contributors to model performance.ResultsFrom 2145 patients in the database, 1190 were included, with 952 in the training dataset and 238 in the test dataset. Median (IQR [range]) age was 71 (61–79 [45–89]) years and 825 (69%) were male. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated robust consistency with an F1 score of 0.712. Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide, oxygen at peak exercise and BMI influenced model performance most significantly, surpassing surgery type and named comorbidities.DiscussionThis study confirms the feasibility of developing a multi‐objective symbolic regression‐based model for predicting 1‐year postoperative mortality in a mixed non‐cardiac surgical population. The model's strong performance underscores the critical role of physiological data, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness, in surgical risk assessment and emphasises the importance of pre‐operative optimisation to identify and manage high‐risk patients. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated high sensitivity and a good F1 score, highlighting its potential as an effective tool for peri‐operative risk prediction.","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality prediction after major surgery in a mixed population through machine learning: a multi‐objective symbolic regression approach\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Arina, Davide Ferrari, Nicholas Tetlow, Amy Dewar, Robert Stephens, Daniel Martin, Ramani Moonesinghe, Vasa Curcin, Mervyn Singer, John Whittle, Evangelos B. Mazomenos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SummaryIntroductionUnderstanding 1‐year mortality following major surgery offers valuable insights into patient outcomes and the quality of peri‐operative care. Few models exist that predict 1‐year mortality accurately. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing complex non‐cardiac surgery using a novel machine‐learning technique called multi‐objective symbolic regression.MethodsA single‐institution database of patients undergoing major elective surgery with previous cardiopulmonary exercise testing was divided into three datasets: pre‐operative clinical data; cardiorespiratory and physiological data; and combined. A multi‐objective symbolic regression model was developed and compared against existing models. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score. Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to identify the major contributors to model performance.ResultsFrom 2145 patients in the database, 1190 were included, with 952 in the training dataset and 238 in the test dataset. Median (IQR [range]) age was 71 (61–79 [45–89]) years and 825 (69%) were male. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated robust consistency with an F1 score of 0.712. Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide, oxygen at peak exercise and BMI influenced model performance most significantly, surpassing surgery type and named comorbidities.DiscussionThis study confirms the feasibility of developing a multi‐objective symbolic regression‐based model for predicting 1‐year postoperative mortality in a mixed non‐cardiac surgical population. The model's strong performance underscores the critical role of physiological data, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness, in surgical risk assessment and emphasises the importance of pre‐operative optimisation to identify and manage high‐risk patients. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated high sensitivity and a good F1 score, highlighting its potential as an effective tool for peri‐operative risk prediction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16538\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解大手术后1年的死亡率为患者预后和围手术期护理质量提供了有价值的见解。很少有模型能准确预测1年的死亡率。本研究旨在利用一种称为多目标符号回归的新型机器学习技术,为接受复杂非心脏手术的患者建立1年死亡率的预测模型。方法对接受重大择期手术且既往有心肺运动试验患者的单机构数据库分为三个数据集:术前临床数据;心肺和生理数据;和总和。建立了一个多目标符号回归模型,并与现有模型进行了比较。采用F1评分评价模型性能。使用Shapley加性解释分析来确定影响模型性能的主要因素。结果从数据库中的2145例患者中,纳入了1190例,其中952例在训练数据集中,238例在测试数据集中。中位(IQR[范围])年龄为71岁(61-79[45-89]),男性825岁(69%)。多目标符号回归模型的F1值为0.712,具有较强的一致性。Shapley加性解释分析表明,二氧化碳、运动高峰时氧气和BMI的通气当量对模型性能的影响最为显著,超过了手术类型和命名合并症。本研究证实了建立基于多目标符号回归模型的可行性,该模型用于预测混合非心脏手术人群术后1年死亡率。该模型的强大性能强调了生理数据,特别是心肺健康,在手术风险评估中的关键作用,并强调了术前优化识别和管理高风险患者的重要性。多目标符号回归模型显示出高灵敏度和良好的F1评分,突出了其作为围手术期风险预测的有效工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mortality prediction after major surgery in a mixed population through machine learning: a multi‐objective symbolic regression approach
SummaryIntroductionUnderstanding 1‐year mortality following major surgery offers valuable insights into patient outcomes and the quality of peri‐operative care. Few models exist that predict 1‐year mortality accurately. This study aimed to develop a predictive model for 1‐year mortality in patients undergoing complex non‐cardiac surgery using a novel machine‐learning technique called multi‐objective symbolic regression.MethodsA single‐institution database of patients undergoing major elective surgery with previous cardiopulmonary exercise testing was divided into three datasets: pre‐operative clinical data; cardiorespiratory and physiological data; and combined. A multi‐objective symbolic regression model was developed and compared against existing models. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score. Shapley additive explanations analysis was used to identify the major contributors to model performance.ResultsFrom 2145 patients in the database, 1190 were included, with 952 in the training dataset and 238 in the test dataset. Median (IQR [range]) age was 71 (61–79 [45–89]) years and 825 (69%) were male. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated robust consistency with an F1 score of 0.712. Shapley additive explanations analysis indicated that ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide, oxygen at peak exercise and BMI influenced model performance most significantly, surpassing surgery type and named comorbidities.DiscussionThis study confirms the feasibility of developing a multi‐objective symbolic regression‐based model for predicting 1‐year postoperative mortality in a mixed non‐cardiac surgical population. The model's strong performance underscores the critical role of physiological data, particularly cardiorespiratory fitness, in surgical risk assessment and emphasises the importance of pre‐operative optimisation to identify and manage high‐risk patients. The multi‐objective symbolic regression model demonstrated high sensitivity and a good F1 score, highlighting its potential as an effective tool for peri‐operative risk prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
The impact of out-of-hours elective surgery: is it worth the risk? Erector spinae plane block vs. rectus sheath block. Gastric ultrasound performance time and difficulty: a prospective observational study. Mandatory training for rare anaesthetic events or mandatory safety preparedness - the beatings will continue until morale improves, or is it time for a carrot and not a stick? Peri-operative corticosteroid supplementation guideline adherence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1