利用集合降雨-径流分析量化降水、地下水补给和河流流量之间的动态联系

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water Resources Research Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1029/2024wr037821
Huibin Gao, Qin Ju, Dawei Zhang, Zhenlong Wang, Zhenchun Hao, James W. Kirchner
{"title":"利用集合降雨-径流分析量化降水、地下水补给和河流流量之间的动态联系","authors":"Huibin Gao, Qin Ju, Dawei Zhang, Zhenlong Wang, Zhenchun Hao, James W. Kirchner","doi":"10.1029/2024wr037821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding streamflow generation at the catchment scale requires quantifying how different components of the system are linked, and how they respond to meteorological forcing. Here we present a proof-of-concept study characterizing and quantifying dynamic linkages between precipitation, groundwater recharge, and streamflow using a data-driven nonlinear deconvolution and demixing approach, Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA). Streamflow in our mesoscale, intensively farmed test catchment is flashy, but occurs at time lags that are too long to be plausibly attributed to overland flow. Instead, ERRA's estimates of the impulse responses of groundwater recharge to precipitation, and of streamflow to groundwater recharge, imply that this intermittent streamflow is primarily driven by precipitation infiltrating to recharge groundwater, followed by discharge of groundwater to streamflow. ERRA reveals that streamflow increases nonlinearly with increasing precipitation intensity or groundwater recharge, and exhibits almost no response to precipitation or recharge rates of less than 10 mm d<sup>−1</sup>. Groundwater recharge is both nonlinear, increasing more-than-proportionally with precipitation intensity, and nonstationary, increasing with antecedent wetness. Simulations with the infiltration model Hydrus-1D can reproduce the observed water table time series reasonably well (NSE = 0.70). However, ERRA shows that the model's impulse response is inconsistent with the real-world impulse response estimated from measured precipitation and groundwater recharge, illustrating that conventional goodness-of-fit statistics can be weak tests of model realism. Thus, our proof-of-concept study demonstrates how impulse responses estimated by ERRA can help clarify linkages between precipitation and streamflow at the catchment scale, quantify nonlinearity and nonstationarity in hydrologic processes, and critically evaluate simulation models.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying Dynamic Linkages Between Precipitation, Groundwater Recharge, and Streamflow Using Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Huibin Gao, Qin Ju, Dawei Zhang, Zhenlong Wang, Zhenchun Hao, James W. Kirchner\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024wr037821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding streamflow generation at the catchment scale requires quantifying how different components of the system are linked, and how they respond to meteorological forcing. Here we present a proof-of-concept study characterizing and quantifying dynamic linkages between precipitation, groundwater recharge, and streamflow using a data-driven nonlinear deconvolution and demixing approach, Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA). Streamflow in our mesoscale, intensively farmed test catchment is flashy, but occurs at time lags that are too long to be plausibly attributed to overland flow. Instead, ERRA's estimates of the impulse responses of groundwater recharge to precipitation, and of streamflow to groundwater recharge, imply that this intermittent streamflow is primarily driven by precipitation infiltrating to recharge groundwater, followed by discharge of groundwater to streamflow. ERRA reveals that streamflow increases nonlinearly with increasing precipitation intensity or groundwater recharge, and exhibits almost no response to precipitation or recharge rates of less than 10 mm d<sup>−1</sup>. Groundwater recharge is both nonlinear, increasing more-than-proportionally with precipitation intensity, and nonstationary, increasing with antecedent wetness. Simulations with the infiltration model Hydrus-1D can reproduce the observed water table time series reasonably well (NSE = 0.70). However, ERRA shows that the model's impulse response is inconsistent with the real-world impulse response estimated from measured precipitation and groundwater recharge, illustrating that conventional goodness-of-fit statistics can be weak tests of model realism. Thus, our proof-of-concept study demonstrates how impulse responses estimated by ERRA can help clarify linkages between precipitation and streamflow at the catchment scale, quantify nonlinearity and nonstationarity in hydrologic processes, and critically evaluate simulation models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037821\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr037821","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理解流域尺度上的水流产生需要量化系统的不同组成部分是如何联系在一起的,以及它们如何对气象强迫作出反应。在这里,我们提出了一项概念验证研究,利用数据驱动的非线性反褶积和分解方法,即集合降雨径流分析(ERRA),表征和量化降水、地下水补给和河流流量之间的动态联系。在我们的中尺度、集约化养殖的测试集水区,水流是浮华的,但发生的时间滞后太长,无法合理地归因于陆上水流。相反,对地下水补给对降水的脉冲响应和径流对地下水补给的脉冲响应的估计表明,这种间歇性的径流主要是由降水入渗补给地下水驱动的,然后是地下水向径流的排放。地磁重构显示,径流随降水强度或地下水补给量的增加呈非线性增加,对降水或补给量小于10 mm d−1几乎没有响应。地下水补给是非线性的,随着降水强度的增加而增加,而非平稳性的,随着前期湿度的增加而增加。采用Hydrus-1D入渗模式模拟可以较好地再现观测到的地下水位时间序列(NSE = 0.70)。然而,该模型的脉冲响应与实测降水和地下水补给估计的真实脉冲响应不一致,说明传统的拟合优度统计可能是模型真实性的弱检验。因此,我们的概念验证研究证明了ERRA估计的脉冲响应如何有助于澄清流域尺度上降水和河流流量之间的联系,量化水文过程中的非线性和非平稳性,并批判性地评估模拟模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying Dynamic Linkages Between Precipitation, Groundwater Recharge, and Streamflow Using Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis
Understanding streamflow generation at the catchment scale requires quantifying how different components of the system are linked, and how they respond to meteorological forcing. Here we present a proof-of-concept study characterizing and quantifying dynamic linkages between precipitation, groundwater recharge, and streamflow using a data-driven nonlinear deconvolution and demixing approach, Ensemble Rainfall-Runoff Analysis (ERRA). Streamflow in our mesoscale, intensively farmed test catchment is flashy, but occurs at time lags that are too long to be plausibly attributed to overland flow. Instead, ERRA's estimates of the impulse responses of groundwater recharge to precipitation, and of streamflow to groundwater recharge, imply that this intermittent streamflow is primarily driven by precipitation infiltrating to recharge groundwater, followed by discharge of groundwater to streamflow. ERRA reveals that streamflow increases nonlinearly with increasing precipitation intensity or groundwater recharge, and exhibits almost no response to precipitation or recharge rates of less than 10 mm d−1. Groundwater recharge is both nonlinear, increasing more-than-proportionally with precipitation intensity, and nonstationary, increasing with antecedent wetness. Simulations with the infiltration model Hydrus-1D can reproduce the observed water table time series reasonably well (NSE = 0.70). However, ERRA shows that the model's impulse response is inconsistent with the real-world impulse response estimated from measured precipitation and groundwater recharge, illustrating that conventional goodness-of-fit statistics can be weak tests of model realism. Thus, our proof-of-concept study demonstrates how impulse responses estimated by ERRA can help clarify linkages between precipitation and streamflow at the catchment scale, quantify nonlinearity and nonstationarity in hydrologic processes, and critically evaluate simulation models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the Distinct Roles of Snowmelt and Glacier-Melt on Agricultural Water Availability: A Novel Indicator and Its Application in a Glacierized Basin of China’s Arid Region Machine Learning Prediction of Tritium-Helium Groundwater Ages in the Central Valley, California, USA Control of Groundwater-Lake Interaction Zone Structure on Spatial Variability of Lacustrine Groundwater Discharge in Oxbow Lake A Cluster-Based Data Assimilation Approach to Generate New Daily Gridded Time Series Precipitation Data in the Himalayan River Basins Physics-Guided Deep Learning Model for Daily Groundwater Table Maps Estimation Using Passive Surface-Wave Dispersion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1