关于开箱即用的AI营销组合模型的入门

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3519172
Macarena Estevez;María Teresa Ballestar;Jorge Sainz
{"title":"关于开箱即用的AI营销组合模型的入门","authors":"Macarena Estevez;María Teresa Ballestar;Jorge Sainz","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3519172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marketing mix modeling (MMM) optimizes budget allocation and determines the return on advertising investment through market response analysis. MMM are vital tools to help marketers define their marketing strategies according to the firm's business and marketing objectives while reducing uncertainty in the decision-making process. As AI and automated MMM out-of-the-box packages gain popularity among marketers, it has become evident there is a theoretical and empirical gap in the understanding of the benefits and inconveniences of these new methods over traditional econometric models. To shed light on these questions, two different models using the same database from a telecommunications firm have been developed and tested using a traditional econometric model and Robyn, an AI-powered open-sourced MMM package from meta marketing science. The research compares both methods’ development processes and subsequent outputs from different perspectives: technical, business, and practical. It shows the advantages and shortcomings of each, providing insightful recommendations for academics and practitioners to navigate through the process of adoption of econometric and AI models for budget allocation decision-making. Econometric models are easy to explain and replicate, while AI complexity from the combination of several methods, their parametrization, and the random initialization of iterations during training, hinders its explainability.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"282-294"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10804651","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Primer on Out-of-the-Box AI Marketing Mix Models\",\"authors\":\"Macarena Estevez;María Teresa Ballestar;Jorge Sainz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2024.3519172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Marketing mix modeling (MMM) optimizes budget allocation and determines the return on advertising investment through market response analysis. MMM are vital tools to help marketers define their marketing strategies according to the firm's business and marketing objectives while reducing uncertainty in the decision-making process. As AI and automated MMM out-of-the-box packages gain popularity among marketers, it has become evident there is a theoretical and empirical gap in the understanding of the benefits and inconveniences of these new methods over traditional econometric models. To shed light on these questions, two different models using the same database from a telecommunications firm have been developed and tested using a traditional econometric model and Robyn, an AI-powered open-sourced MMM package from meta marketing science. The research compares both methods’ development processes and subsequent outputs from different perspectives: technical, business, and practical. It shows the advantages and shortcomings of each, providing insightful recommendations for academics and practitioners to navigate through the process of adoption of econometric and AI models for budget allocation decision-making. Econometric models are easy to explain and replicate, while AI complexity from the combination of several methods, their parametrization, and the random initialization of iterations during training, hinders its explainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"282-294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10804651\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10804651/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10804651/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

营销组合模型(MMM)通过市场反应分析,优化预算分配,确定广告投资回报。MMM是帮助营销人员根据公司的业务和营销目标确定营销策略的重要工具,同时减少决策过程中的不确定性。随着人工智能和自动MMM开箱即用的包装在营销人员中越来越受欢迎,很明显,在理解这些新方法与传统计量经济模型相比的好处和不便方面,存在理论和经验上的差距。为了阐明这些问题,使用来自电信公司的相同数据库开发了两个不同的模型,并使用传统的计量经济学模型和Robyn(来自元营销科学的人工智能驱动的开源MMM软件包)进行了测试。该研究从技术、商业和实践的不同角度比较了这两种方法的开发过程和随后的产出。它展示了每种方法的优点和缺点,为学者和从业者在采用计量经济学和人工智能模型进行预算分配决策的过程中提供了有见地的建议。计量经济模型易于解释和复制,而人工智能的复杂性来自几种方法的组合,它们的参数化,以及训练过程中迭代的随机初始化,阻碍了它的可解释性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Primer on Out-of-the-Box AI Marketing Mix Models
Marketing mix modeling (MMM) optimizes budget allocation and determines the return on advertising investment through market response analysis. MMM are vital tools to help marketers define their marketing strategies according to the firm's business and marketing objectives while reducing uncertainty in the decision-making process. As AI and automated MMM out-of-the-box packages gain popularity among marketers, it has become evident there is a theoretical and empirical gap in the understanding of the benefits and inconveniences of these new methods over traditional econometric models. To shed light on these questions, two different models using the same database from a telecommunications firm have been developed and tested using a traditional econometric model and Robyn, an AI-powered open-sourced MMM package from meta marketing science. The research compares both methods’ development processes and subsequent outputs from different perspectives: technical, business, and practical. It shows the advantages and shortcomings of each, providing insightful recommendations for academics and practitioners to navigate through the process of adoption of econometric and AI models for budget allocation decision-making. Econometric models are easy to explain and replicate, while AI complexity from the combination of several methods, their parametrization, and the random initialization of iterations during training, hinders its explainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Guest Editorial: Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in the New Product Development Process—A Call for More Empirical Evidence How to Operate Electricity Markets Using a Trilevel Optimization Framework Overqualified Yet Motivated: Work Motivation, Technology Uncertainty and Overqualified Employees’ Innovative Behavior Tailoring Success: Harnessing the Creational Affordances of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Drive Market Performance Developing the Innovation Capabilities of SMEs: The Role of Intermediary Firms in Knowledge Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1