瑞典高中教育中的化学键:一种增强理解的以力为基础的教学模式

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1039/D4RP00258J
Catalin Koro Arvidsson
{"title":"瑞典高中教育中的化学键:一种增强理解的以力为基础的教学模式","authors":"Catalin Koro Arvidsson","doi":"10.1039/D4RP00258J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study investigates if a force-based teaching approach, based on quantum mechanical principles and developed in a lesson study, would enhance the understanding of chemical bonding among upper secondary school students. The teaching approach was based on research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. The study included first-year students in upper secondary school in a pretest–intervention–posttest design. During four lessons the students were introduced to the underlying forces leading to the formation of all chemical bonds, specifically focusing on ionic- and covalent bonds. The first lesson, which included a presentation of coulombic interaction as a common basis of bond formation, was developed and improved through a lesson study. The lesson was revised based on feedback from 75 students describing why chemical bondings occur. After the four-lesson series about chemical bonding, a total of 67 of the 75 enrolled students had completed both a pre- and a posttest. The students’ answers to the tests were analyzed based on Bernstein's theory of vertical hierarchical and vertical horizontal discourse. The results of the posttests show that 60% of the students demonstrated solely or predominantly vertical hierarchical knowledge structure. These results indicate that most of the students could understand the force-based approach of chemical bonding by using a general theory, spanning over a wide range of the natural science field, with an abstract and specialized language. Moreover, the students who internalized a hierarchichal knowledge discourse about chemical bonding earned higher final grades in the upper secondary school chemistry when compared to students using a horizontal knowledge discourse, indicating that a force-based approach might facilitate a deeper understanding of other subareas within chemistry. In chemistry education research, the effect of using a force-based approach to teach chemical bonding has not previously been widely tested among upper secondary school students. This study responds to the need to test alternative teaching models to facilitate students’ understanding of chemical bonding.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 315-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical bonding in Swedish upper secondary school education: a force-based teaching model for enhanced understanding\",\"authors\":\"Catalin Koro Arvidsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4RP00258J\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study investigates if a force-based teaching approach, based on quantum mechanical principles and developed in a lesson study, would enhance the understanding of chemical bonding among upper secondary school students. The teaching approach was based on research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. The study included first-year students in upper secondary school in a pretest–intervention–posttest design. During four lessons the students were introduced to the underlying forces leading to the formation of all chemical bonds, specifically focusing on ionic- and covalent bonds. The first lesson, which included a presentation of coulombic interaction as a common basis of bond formation, was developed and improved through a lesson study. The lesson was revised based on feedback from 75 students describing why chemical bondings occur. After the four-lesson series about chemical bonding, a total of 67 of the 75 enrolled students had completed both a pre- and a posttest. The students’ answers to the tests were analyzed based on Bernstein's theory of vertical hierarchical and vertical horizontal discourse. The results of the posttests show that 60% of the students demonstrated solely or predominantly vertical hierarchical knowledge structure. These results indicate that most of the students could understand the force-based approach of chemical bonding by using a general theory, spanning over a wide range of the natural science field, with an abstract and specialized language. Moreover, the students who internalized a hierarchichal knowledge discourse about chemical bonding earned higher final grades in the upper secondary school chemistry when compared to students using a horizontal knowledge discourse, indicating that a force-based approach might facilitate a deeper understanding of other subareas within chemistry. In chemistry education research, the effect of using a force-based approach to teach chemical bonding has not previously been widely tested among upper secondary school students. This study responds to the need to test alternative teaching models to facilitate students’ understanding of chemical bonding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\" 315-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00258j\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/rp/d4rp00258j","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨一种基于量子力学原理并在课堂研究中发展的基于力的教学方法是否能提高高中生对化学键的理解。在对化学键的教与学进行研究的基础上,提出了一种教学方法。本研究采用前测-干预-后测设计,研究对象为高中一年级学生。在四节课中,学生们被介绍了导致所有化学键形成的潜在力量,特别是离子键和共价键。第一课,包括库仑相互作用作为键形成的共同基础的介绍,是通过课程研究发展和完善的。这堂课是根据75名学生描述化学键发生的原因的反馈进行修改的。在四节关于化学键的系列课程之后,75名注册学生中共有67人完成了前测和后测。根据Bernstein的纵向层次理论和纵向水平话语理论对学生的回答进行分析。后测结果显示,60%的学生完全或主要表现为垂直层次知识结构。这些结果表明,大多数学生可以用抽象和专业的语言,用一个涵盖广泛自然科学领域的一般理论来理解基于力的化学键方法。此外,与使用水平知识话语的学生相比,内化关于化学键的分层知识话语的学生在高中化学中获得了更高的最终成绩,这表明基于力的方法可能有助于更深入地理解化学中的其他子领域。在化学教育研究中,使用基于力的方法来教授化学键的效果以前没有在高中生中进行过广泛的测试。本研究回应了测试替代教学模式的需要,以促进学生对化学键的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chemical bonding in Swedish upper secondary school education: a force-based teaching model for enhanced understanding

This study investigates if a force-based teaching approach, based on quantum mechanical principles and developed in a lesson study, would enhance the understanding of chemical bonding among upper secondary school students. The teaching approach was based on research on the teaching and learning of chemical bonding. The study included first-year students in upper secondary school in a pretest–intervention–posttest design. During four lessons the students were introduced to the underlying forces leading to the formation of all chemical bonds, specifically focusing on ionic- and covalent bonds. The first lesson, which included a presentation of coulombic interaction as a common basis of bond formation, was developed and improved through a lesson study. The lesson was revised based on feedback from 75 students describing why chemical bondings occur. After the four-lesson series about chemical bonding, a total of 67 of the 75 enrolled students had completed both a pre- and a posttest. The students’ answers to the tests were analyzed based on Bernstein's theory of vertical hierarchical and vertical horizontal discourse. The results of the posttests show that 60% of the students demonstrated solely or predominantly vertical hierarchical knowledge structure. These results indicate that most of the students could understand the force-based approach of chemical bonding by using a general theory, spanning over a wide range of the natural science field, with an abstract and specialized language. Moreover, the students who internalized a hierarchichal knowledge discourse about chemical bonding earned higher final grades in the upper secondary school chemistry when compared to students using a horizontal knowledge discourse, indicating that a force-based approach might facilitate a deeper understanding of other subareas within chemistry. In chemistry education research, the effect of using a force-based approach to teach chemical bonding has not previously been widely tested among upper secondary school students. This study responds to the need to test alternative teaching models to facilitate students’ understanding of chemical bonding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Back cover Student conceptualizations and predictions of substitution and elimination reactions: what are they seeing on the page?† Self-regulated learning strategies for success in an online first-year chemistry course ‘Seeing’ chemistry: investigating the contribution of mental imagery strength on students’ thinking in relation to visuospatial problem solving in chemistry† Student's study behaviors as a predictor of performance in general chemistry I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1