{"title":"用中心极限定理评价垃圾填埋场开挖样本数量的充分性","authors":"Seung-Kyu Chun, Sang-Hoon Song, Jin-Kyu Park","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adequacy of the number of samples extracted using the central limit theorem (CLT) was evaluated for 11 excavation waste items at the S landfill site in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. The relative error range, which is the error-capable range for the estimated average value for each analyzed item, was the largest at 22.2% hemicellulose, 19.9% sulfur, and 14.7% cellulose, and the smallest at 3.4% combustibility. At the 95% reliability level and 10% relative error range, the number of samples of N, S, hemicellulose, and cellulose was insufficient, and at the 5% relative error range, the number of samples was insufficient for all items, except for moisture and combustibility. It was determined that it would be practically impossible to secure excavated samples below 3% error range. The results of this study show that CLT is useful for evaluating the reliability of the results of landfill collection sample analysis and determining the appropriate number of samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"420 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the adequacy of the number of landfill excavated samples by the central limit theorem\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Kyu Chun, Sang-Hoon Song, Jin-Kyu Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The adequacy of the number of samples extracted using the central limit theorem (CLT) was evaluated for 11 excavation waste items at the S landfill site in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. The relative error range, which is the error-capable range for the estimated average value for each analyzed item, was the largest at 22.2% hemicellulose, 19.9% sulfur, and 14.7% cellulose, and the smallest at 3.4% combustibility. At the 95% reliability level and 10% relative error range, the number of samples of N, S, hemicellulose, and cellulose was insufficient, and at the 5% relative error range, the number of samples was insufficient for all items, except for moisture and combustibility. It was determined that it would be practically impossible to secure excavated samples below 3% error range. The results of this study show that CLT is useful for evaluating the reliability of the results of landfill collection sample analysis and determining the appropriate number of samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"420 - 428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the adequacy of the number of landfill excavated samples by the central limit theorem
The adequacy of the number of samples extracted using the central limit theorem (CLT) was evaluated for 11 excavation waste items at the S landfill site in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. The relative error range, which is the error-capable range for the estimated average value for each analyzed item, was the largest at 22.2% hemicellulose, 19.9% sulfur, and 14.7% cellulose, and the smallest at 3.4% combustibility. At the 95% reliability level and 10% relative error range, the number of samples of N, S, hemicellulose, and cellulose was insufficient, and at the 5% relative error range, the number of samples was insufficient for all items, except for moisture and combustibility. It was determined that it would be practically impossible to secure excavated samples below 3% error range. The results of this study show that CLT is useful for evaluating the reliability of the results of landfill collection sample analysis and determining the appropriate number of samples.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles.
The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management.
The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).