用中心极限定理评价垃圾填埋场开挖样本数量的充分性

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3
Seung-Kyu Chun, Sang-Hoon Song, Jin-Kyu Park
{"title":"用中心极限定理评价垃圾填埋场开挖样本数量的充分性","authors":"Seung-Kyu Chun,&nbsp;Sang-Hoon Song,&nbsp;Jin-Kyu Park","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The adequacy of the number of samples extracted using the central limit theorem (CLT) was evaluated for 11 excavation waste items at the S landfill site in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. The relative error range, which is the error-capable range for the estimated average value for each analyzed item, was the largest at 22.2% hemicellulose, 19.9% sulfur, and 14.7% cellulose, and the smallest at 3.4% combustibility. At the 95% reliability level and 10% relative error range, the number of samples of N, S, hemicellulose, and cellulose was insufficient, and at the 5% relative error range, the number of samples was insufficient for all items, except for moisture and combustibility. It was determined that it would be practically impossible to secure excavated samples below 3% error range. The results of this study show that CLT is useful for evaluating the reliability of the results of landfill collection sample analysis and determining the appropriate number of samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"420 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the adequacy of the number of landfill excavated samples by the central limit theorem\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Kyu Chun,&nbsp;Sang-Hoon Song,&nbsp;Jin-Kyu Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The adequacy of the number of samples extracted using the central limit theorem (CLT) was evaluated for 11 excavation waste items at the S landfill site in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. The relative error range, which is the error-capable range for the estimated average value for each analyzed item, was the largest at 22.2% hemicellulose, 19.9% sulfur, and 14.7% cellulose, and the smallest at 3.4% combustibility. At the 95% reliability level and 10% relative error range, the number of samples of N, S, hemicellulose, and cellulose was insufficient, and at the 5% relative error range, the number of samples was insufficient for all items, except for moisture and combustibility. It was determined that it would be practically impossible to secure excavated samples below 3% error range. The results of this study show that CLT is useful for evaluating the reliability of the results of landfill collection sample analysis and determining the appropriate number of samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"420 - 428\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02121-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用中心极限定理(CLT)对首尔S垃圾填埋场的11个挖掘废弃物进行了样本数量的充分性评价。相对误差范围(即每个分析项目的估计平均值的误差范围)在半纤维素含量为22.2%、硫含量为19.9%和纤维素含量为14.7%时最大,在可燃性为3.4%时最小。在95%的信度和10%的相对误差范围内,N、S、半纤维素和纤维素的样品数量不足;在5%的相对误差范围内,除水分和可燃性外,所有项目的样品数量都不足。结果表明,几乎不可能确保挖掘样品的误差范围低于3%。研究结果表明,CLT可用于评价垃圾填埋场收集样品分析结果的可靠性和确定适当的样品数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the adequacy of the number of landfill excavated samples by the central limit theorem

The adequacy of the number of samples extracted using the central limit theorem (CLT) was evaluated for 11 excavation waste items at the S landfill site in the Seoul metropolitan area of Korea. The relative error range, which is the error-capable range for the estimated average value for each analyzed item, was the largest at 22.2% hemicellulose, 19.9% sulfur, and 14.7% cellulose, and the smallest at 3.4% combustibility. At the 95% reliability level and 10% relative error range, the number of samples of N, S, hemicellulose, and cellulose was insufficient, and at the 5% relative error range, the number of samples was insufficient for all items, except for moisture and combustibility. It was determined that it would be practically impossible to secure excavated samples below 3% error range. The results of this study show that CLT is useful for evaluating the reliability of the results of landfill collection sample analysis and determining the appropriate number of samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
Choosing among plastic waste management options: lessons from Zimbabwe’s plastic waste flows Wimplebin: an AI-based recycle bin for a better waste management Selective bromination-volatilization of PbO from ZnO-PbO mixtures using bromine-containing plastic: A promising approach for recycling hazardous wastes Pyrometallurgical eco-recycling for Zn and MnO recovery from spent alkaline and Zn–C batteries Analysis of chemical-looping method for production of hydrogen gas from sewage sludge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1