发展中国家中型都市地区城市固体废物管理战略的生命周期评价

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1007/s10163-024-02094-3
José Carlos Martins Ramalho, João Luiz Calmon, Diogo Appel Colvero, Darli Vieira, Alencar Bravo
{"title":"发展中国家中型都市地区城市固体废物管理战略的生命周期评价","authors":"José Carlos Martins Ramalho,&nbsp;João Luiz Calmon,&nbsp;Diogo Appel Colvero,&nbsp;Darli Vieira,&nbsp;Alencar Bravo","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02094-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The goal of this paper is to conduct an environmental analysis of a municipal solid waste management system in a midsized region of Southeast Brazil with two million inhabitants. While the current municipal solid waste management system has already eradicated dumps, it landfills practically all its waste, with &lt; 2% open composting and recycling. Therefore, alternatives such as closed composting (CC), anaerobic digestion (AD) with electricity or biomethane production, and incineration are proposed via scenarios in which legal requirements are observed and diversion targets are set. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed using EASETECH, a specific software for municipal solid waste (MSW) management systems. The results show that the high diversions scenario (70% recyclables/biowaste) with upgraded biomethane from AD and recycling had 76% greater environmental savings than the similar scenario with the new Brazilian diversion targets (25.8% recyclables, 18.1% biowaste). CC performed much worse than AD, with 80% less savings, although it was marginally better than open composting, with a 95% difference in savings. Despite the benefits of incineration, these scenarios were penalized for their toxicity. Recycling is always recommended if feasible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 1","pages":"638 - 653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management strategies for midsized metropolitan areas in developing countries\",\"authors\":\"José Carlos Martins Ramalho,&nbsp;João Luiz Calmon,&nbsp;Diogo Appel Colvero,&nbsp;Darli Vieira,&nbsp;Alencar Bravo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02094-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The goal of this paper is to conduct an environmental analysis of a municipal solid waste management system in a midsized region of Southeast Brazil with two million inhabitants. While the current municipal solid waste management system has already eradicated dumps, it landfills practically all its waste, with &lt; 2% open composting and recycling. Therefore, alternatives such as closed composting (CC), anaerobic digestion (AD) with electricity or biomethane production, and incineration are proposed via scenarios in which legal requirements are observed and diversion targets are set. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed using EASETECH, a specific software for municipal solid waste (MSW) management systems. The results show that the high diversions scenario (70% recyclables/biowaste) with upgraded biomethane from AD and recycling had 76% greater environmental savings than the similar scenario with the new Brazilian diversion targets (25.8% recyclables, 18.1% biowaste). CC performed much worse than AD, with 80% less savings, although it was marginally better than open composting, with a 95% difference in savings. Despite the benefits of incineration, these scenarios were penalized for their toxicity. Recycling is always recommended if feasible.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"638 - 653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02094-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02094-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目标是在巴西东南部一个拥有200万居民的中型地区对城市固体废物管理系统进行环境分析。虽然目前的城市固体废物管理系统已经根除了垃圾场,但它将几乎所有的废物都填埋,其中2%的废物开放堆肥和回收。因此,在遵守法律要求和设定转移目标的情况下,提出了闭式堆肥(CC)、用电或生物甲烷生产厌氧消化(AD)和焚烧等替代方案。生命周期评估(LCA)是使用EASETECH进行的,EASETECH是城市固体废物(MSW)管理系统的专用软件。结果表明,与巴西新转移目标(25.8%可回收物,18.1%生物废物)的类似情景相比,从AD和回收中升级生物甲烷的高转移情景(70%可回收物/生物废物)节约了76%的环境。CC的表现比AD差得多,节省了80%,尽管它比开放式堆肥略好,节省了95%。尽管焚烧有好处,但这些情况因其毒性而受到惩罚。如果可行的话,总是建议回收利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management strategies for midsized metropolitan areas in developing countries

The goal of this paper is to conduct an environmental analysis of a municipal solid waste management system in a midsized region of Southeast Brazil with two million inhabitants. While the current municipal solid waste management system has already eradicated dumps, it landfills practically all its waste, with < 2% open composting and recycling. Therefore, alternatives such as closed composting (CC), anaerobic digestion (AD) with electricity or biomethane production, and incineration are proposed via scenarios in which legal requirements are observed and diversion targets are set. Life cycle assessment (LCA) was performed using EASETECH, a specific software for municipal solid waste (MSW) management systems. The results show that the high diversions scenario (70% recyclables/biowaste) with upgraded biomethane from AD and recycling had 76% greater environmental savings than the similar scenario with the new Brazilian diversion targets (25.8% recyclables, 18.1% biowaste). CC performed much worse than AD, with 80% less savings, although it was marginally better than open composting, with a 95% difference in savings. Despite the benefits of incineration, these scenarios were penalized for their toxicity. Recycling is always recommended if feasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
期刊最新文献
Choosing among plastic waste management options: lessons from Zimbabwe’s plastic waste flows Wimplebin: an AI-based recycle bin for a better waste management Selective bromination-volatilization of PbO from ZnO-PbO mixtures using bromine-containing plastic: A promising approach for recycling hazardous wastes Pyrometallurgical eco-recycling for Zn and MnO recovery from spent alkaline and Zn–C batteries Analysis of chemical-looping method for production of hydrogen gas from sewage sludge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1