{"title":"腹筋膜扩张和腹部成形术患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险:文献的系统回顾。","authors":"Eric Swanson","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repair of the abdominal fascia at the time of abdominoplasty is a valuable method to improve the contour of the abdomen. However, this maneuver has been linked to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This review was undertaken to evaluate the evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic literature review was conducted to identify publications on the subject of abdominal fascial repair during abdominoplasty and VTE risk. Key words included abdominoplasty, fascial plication, intra-abdominal pressure, and venous thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three large clinical studies were identified. One retrospective study using matched comparisons reported nearly identical VTE rates for patients treated with and without abdominal fascial plication (1.5% vs 1.7%). Another retrospective study reported significantly more VTEs (2.3%) in abdominoplasty patients undergoing fascial repair compared with panniculectomy patients who did not undergo fascial plication (0.36%). The author also recommended a modified Caprini score, adding fascial repair as a risk factor. Only 1 prospective study reported a large number of consecutive plastic surgery outpatients evaluated with Doppler ultrasound. This group included 188 abdominoplasty patients, all treated with fascial plication and without muscle paralysis. Only 1 VTE was diagnosed on the day after abdominoplasty (0.5%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Retrospective studies are susceptible to confounders and confirmation bias. Caprini scores do not have a scientific foundation. Chemoprophylaxis increases the risk of bleeding without reducing the risk of VTE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best available evidence supports performing a fascial repair. An effective and safe alternative to Caprini scores and chemoprophylaxis is avoidance of muscle paralysis and early detection of VTEs using ultrasound screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abdominal Fascial Plication and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominoplasty Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Swanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Repair of the abdominal fascia at the time of abdominoplasty is a valuable method to improve the contour of the abdomen. However, this maneuver has been linked to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This review was undertaken to evaluate the evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic literature review was conducted to identify publications on the subject of abdominal fascial repair during abdominoplasty and VTE risk. Key words included abdominoplasty, fascial plication, intra-abdominal pressure, and venous thrombosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three large clinical studies were identified. One retrospective study using matched comparisons reported nearly identical VTE rates for patients treated with and without abdominal fascial plication (1.5% vs 1.7%). Another retrospective study reported significantly more VTEs (2.3%) in abdominoplasty patients undergoing fascial repair compared with panniculectomy patients who did not undergo fascial plication (0.36%). The author also recommended a modified Caprini score, adding fascial repair as a risk factor. Only 1 prospective study reported a large number of consecutive plastic surgery outpatients evaluated with Doppler ultrasound. This group included 188 abdominoplasty patients, all treated with fascial plication and without muscle paralysis. Only 1 VTE was diagnosed on the day after abdominoplasty (0.5%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Retrospective studies are susceptible to confounders and confirmation bias. Caprini scores do not have a scientific foundation. Chemoprophylaxis increases the risk of bleeding without reducing the risk of VTE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best available evidence supports performing a fascial repair. An effective and safe alternative to Caprini scores and chemoprophylaxis is avoidance of muscle paralysis and early detection of VTEs using ultrasound screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004149\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在腹部成形术中修补腹筋膜是改善腹部轮廓的一种有效方法。然而,这种操作与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加有关。进行这项审查是为了评价证据。方法:进行电子文献综述,以确定在腹部成形术中腹筋膜修复和静脉血栓栓塞风险的出版物。关键词:腹部成形术,筋膜应用,腹内压,静脉血栓形成。结果:确定了三个大型临床研究。一项采用匹配比较的回顾性研究报告,接受和不接受腹筋膜应用治疗的患者的静脉血栓栓塞率几乎相同(1.5% vs 1.7%)。另一项回顾性研究报道,与未行筋膜应用的胰管切除术患者(0.36%)相比,行筋膜修复的腹成形术患者的静脉血栓栓塞发生率(2.3%)显著增加。作者还推荐了改良的capriini评分,增加了筋膜修复作为危险因素。只有1项前瞻性研究报道了大量连续整形外科门诊患者接受多普勒超声评估。本组包括188例腹部成形术患者,均行筋膜扩张术,无肌肉麻痹。只有1例静脉血栓栓塞在腹部成形术后的第二天被诊断出来(0.5%)。讨论:回顾性研究容易受到混杂因素和确认偏倚的影响。卡普里尼分数没有科学依据。化学预防会增加出血的风险,但不会降低静脉血栓栓塞的风险。结论:现有的最佳证据支持进行筋膜修复。一个有效和安全的替代卡普里尼评分和化学预防是避免肌肉麻痹和早期发现静脉血栓栓塞使用超声筛查。
Abdominal Fascial Plication and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominoplasty Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Background: Repair of the abdominal fascia at the time of abdominoplasty is a valuable method to improve the contour of the abdomen. However, this maneuver has been linked to an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This review was undertaken to evaluate the evidence.
Methods: An electronic literature review was conducted to identify publications on the subject of abdominal fascial repair during abdominoplasty and VTE risk. Key words included abdominoplasty, fascial plication, intra-abdominal pressure, and venous thrombosis.
Results: Three large clinical studies were identified. One retrospective study using matched comparisons reported nearly identical VTE rates for patients treated with and without abdominal fascial plication (1.5% vs 1.7%). Another retrospective study reported significantly more VTEs (2.3%) in abdominoplasty patients undergoing fascial repair compared with panniculectomy patients who did not undergo fascial plication (0.36%). The author also recommended a modified Caprini score, adding fascial repair as a risk factor. Only 1 prospective study reported a large number of consecutive plastic surgery outpatients evaluated with Doppler ultrasound. This group included 188 abdominoplasty patients, all treated with fascial plication and without muscle paralysis. Only 1 VTE was diagnosed on the day after abdominoplasty (0.5%).
Discussion: Retrospective studies are susceptible to confounders and confirmation bias. Caprini scores do not have a scientific foundation. Chemoprophylaxis increases the risk of bleeding without reducing the risk of VTE.
Conclusions: The best available evidence supports performing a fascial repair. An effective and safe alternative to Caprini scores and chemoprophylaxis is avoidance of muscle paralysis and early detection of VTEs using ultrasound screening.
期刊介绍:
The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.