确定基因检测在自闭症谱系障碍和智力发育障碍评估中的比率。

IF 5.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Autism Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1177/13623613241289980
Kyla Arcebido, Emily Val Tuliao, Andryella Maxie Ibarra, Kai Russell, Aracelly Valdes, Sohum Shinkre, Samantha Gefen, Amelia Evans, Sabrina Barella, Joelle Wadei, Isabella Quinon, Takahiro Soda
{"title":"确定基因检测在自闭症谱系障碍和智力发育障碍评估中的比率。","authors":"Kyla Arcebido, Emily Val Tuliao, Andryella Maxie Ibarra, Kai Russell, Aracelly Valdes, Sohum Shinkre, Samantha Gefen, Amelia Evans, Sabrina Barella, Joelle Wadei, Isabella Quinon, Takahiro Soda","doi":"10.1177/13623613241289980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Lay abstract: </strong>Genetic testing is recommended by various professional organizations as part of clinical guidelines during the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental disorders. However, previous studies demonstrate that rates of genetic testing are low. This study aimed to identify the rates of genetic testing within a large university healthcare network and factors that may be associated with higher or lower rates. Researchers reviewed over 7500 electronic health records of patients who were evaluated for ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders. Some factors that were recorded include patient demographics (race, gender, insurance, zip code), ordered but not completed tests, genetic test results and reasons for declining genetic tests if noted, and other known barriers to genetic testing such as blood draws and specialties of providers seen by patients. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine associations between rates of genetic testing and different factors recorded in our database. Our results demonstrate that less than half of patients received at least one indicated genetic test, while a smaller percentage received recommended genetic tests. While sex assigned at birth and gender did not impact whether a patient received at least one indicated genetic test, race and insurance did. Our review reveals that genetic testing is not sufficiently offered by physicians, and we have identified multiple obstacles that prevent patients from receiving genetic testing which must be further investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"13623613241289980"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining rates of genetic testing in the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual and developmental disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Kyla Arcebido, Emily Val Tuliao, Andryella Maxie Ibarra, Kai Russell, Aracelly Valdes, Sohum Shinkre, Samantha Gefen, Amelia Evans, Sabrina Barella, Joelle Wadei, Isabella Quinon, Takahiro Soda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13623613241289980\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Lay abstract: </strong>Genetic testing is recommended by various professional organizations as part of clinical guidelines during the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental disorders. However, previous studies demonstrate that rates of genetic testing are low. This study aimed to identify the rates of genetic testing within a large university healthcare network and factors that may be associated with higher or lower rates. Researchers reviewed over 7500 electronic health records of patients who were evaluated for ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders. Some factors that were recorded include patient demographics (race, gender, insurance, zip code), ordered but not completed tests, genetic test results and reasons for declining genetic tests if noted, and other known barriers to genetic testing such as blood draws and specialties of providers seen by patients. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine associations between rates of genetic testing and different factors recorded in our database. Our results demonstrate that less than half of patients received at least one indicated genetic test, while a smaller percentage received recommended genetic tests. While sex assigned at birth and gender did not impact whether a patient received at least one indicated genetic test, race and insurance did. Our review reveals that genetic testing is not sufficiently offered by physicians, and we have identified multiple obstacles that prevent patients from receiving genetic testing which must be further investigated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13623613241289980\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241289980\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613241289980","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:基因检测被各种专业组织推荐作为评估自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和其他神经发育障碍临床指南的一部分。然而,先前的研究表明,基因检测的比率很低。本研究旨在确定大型大学医疗保健网络中的基因检测率以及可能与较高或较低比率相关的因素。研究人员回顾了7500多名被评估为自闭症谱系障碍或其他神经发育障碍的患者的电子健康记录。记录的一些因素包括患者人口统计数据(种族、性别、保险、邮政编码)、已订购但未完成的测试、基因测试结果和拒绝进行基因测试的原因(如果注意到),以及其他已知的基因测试障碍,如抽血和患者就诊的提供者的专业。通过统计分析确定基因检测率与数据库中记录的不同因素之间的关系。我们的结果表明,不到一半的患者接受了至少一种指示基因检测,而接受推荐基因检测的比例更小。虽然出生时的生理性别和性别对患者是否接受至少一项基因检测没有影响,但种族和保险却有影响。我们的综述显示,医生提供的基因检测并不充分,我们已经确定了阻止患者接受基因检测的多种障碍,这些障碍必须进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determining rates of genetic testing in the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual and developmental disorder.

Lay abstract: Genetic testing is recommended by various professional organizations as part of clinical guidelines during the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and other neurodevelopmental disorders. However, previous studies demonstrate that rates of genetic testing are low. This study aimed to identify the rates of genetic testing within a large university healthcare network and factors that may be associated with higher or lower rates. Researchers reviewed over 7500 electronic health records of patients who were evaluated for ASD or other neurodevelopmental disorders. Some factors that were recorded include patient demographics (race, gender, insurance, zip code), ordered but not completed tests, genetic test results and reasons for declining genetic tests if noted, and other known barriers to genetic testing such as blood draws and specialties of providers seen by patients. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine associations between rates of genetic testing and different factors recorded in our database. Our results demonstrate that less than half of patients received at least one indicated genetic test, while a smaller percentage received recommended genetic tests. While sex assigned at birth and gender did not impact whether a patient received at least one indicated genetic test, race and insurance did. Our review reveals that genetic testing is not sufficiently offered by physicians, and we have identified multiple obstacles that prevent patients from receiving genetic testing which must be further investigated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism
Autism PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.50%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Autism is a major, peer-reviewed, international journal, published 8 times a year, publishing research of direct and practical relevance to help improve the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. It is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on research in many areas, including: intervention; diagnosis; training; education; translational issues related to neuroscience, medical and genetic issues of practical import; psychological processes; evaluation of particular therapies; quality of life; family needs; and epidemiological research. Autism provides a major international forum for peer-reviewed research of direct and practical relevance to improving the quality of life for individuals with autism or autism-related disorders. The journal''s success and popularity reflect the recent worldwide growth in the research and understanding of autistic spectrum disorders, and the consequent impact on the provision of treatment and care. Autism is interdisciplinary in nature, focusing on evaluative research in all areas, including: intervention, diagnosis, training, education, neuroscience, psychological processes, evaluation of particular therapies, quality of life issues, family issues and family services, medical and genetic issues, epidemiological research.
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 health distress among autistic adults: Does psychological flexibility explain effects of health distress on mental health concerns? How can we make therapy better for autistic adults? Autistic adults' ratings of helpfulness of adaptations to therapy. Prevalence of discrimination experienced by autistic youth as compared to neurotypical youth and youth with other neurodevelopmental diagnoses. A non-systematic overview review of self-focused emotion regulation in autistic individuals through the lens of the extended process model. Determining rates of genetic testing in the evaluation of autism spectrum disorder and intellectual and developmental disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1