Anna Roto Cataldo, Jie Fei, Karen J Hutchinson, Regina Sloutsky, Julie Starr, Stefano M M De Rossi, Louis N Awad
{"title":"增强脑卒中后患者基于心率的能量消耗和运动强度评估。","authors":"Anna Roto Cataldo, Jie Fei, Karen J Hutchinson, Regina Sloutsky, Julie Starr, Stefano M M De Rossi, Louis N Awad","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering11121250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard field-testing technique for measuring energy expenditure and exercise intensity based on the volume of oxygen consumed (VO<sub>2</sub>, mL O<sub>2</sub>/min). Although heart rate is often used as a proxy for VO<sub>2</sub>, heart rate-based estimates of VO<sub>2</sub> may be inaccurate after stroke due to changes in the heart rate-VO<sub>2</sub> relationship. Our objective was to evaluate in people post stroke the accuracy of using heart rate to estimate relative walking VO<sub>2</sub> (wVO<sub>2</sub>) and classify exercise intensity. Moreover, we sought to determine if estimation accuracy could be improved by including clinical variables related to patients' function and health in the estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen individuals post stroke completed treadmill walking exercises with concurrent indirect calorimetry and heart rate monitoring. Using 70% of the data, forward selection regression with repeated k-fold cross-validation was used to build wVO<sub>2</sub> estimation equations that use heart rate alone and together with clinical variables available at the point-of-care (i.e., BMI, age, sex, and comfortable walking speed). The remaining 30% of the data were used to evaluate accuracy by comparing (1) the estimated and actual wVO<sub>2</sub> measurements and (2) the exercise intensity classifications based on metabolic equivalents (METs) calculated using the estimated and actual wVO<sub>2</sub> measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heart rate-based wVO<sub>2</sub> estimates were inaccurate (MAE = 3.11 mL O<sub>2</sub>/kg/min) and unreliable (ICC = 0.68). Incorporating BMI, age, and sex in the estimation resulted in improvements in accuracy (MAE Δ: -36.01%, MAE = 1.99 mL O<sub>2</sub>/kg/min) and reliability (ICC Δ: +20, ICC = 0.88). Improved exercise intensity classifications were also observed, with higher accuracy (Δ: +29.85%, from 0.67 to 0.87), kappa (Δ: +108.33%, from 0.36 to 0.75), sensitivity (Δ: +30.43%, from 0.46 to 0.60), and specificity (Δ: +17.95%, from 0.78 to 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In people post stroke, heart rate-based wVO<sub>2</sub> estimations are inaccurate but can be substantially improved by incorporating clinical variables readily available at the point of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"11 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Heart Rate-Based Estimation of Energy Expenditure and Exercise Intensity in Patients Post Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Roto Cataldo, Jie Fei, Karen J Hutchinson, Regina Sloutsky, Julie Starr, Stefano M M De Rossi, Louis N Awad\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering11121250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard field-testing technique for measuring energy expenditure and exercise intensity based on the volume of oxygen consumed (VO<sub>2</sub>, mL O<sub>2</sub>/min). Although heart rate is often used as a proxy for VO<sub>2</sub>, heart rate-based estimates of VO<sub>2</sub> may be inaccurate after stroke due to changes in the heart rate-VO<sub>2</sub> relationship. Our objective was to evaluate in people post stroke the accuracy of using heart rate to estimate relative walking VO<sub>2</sub> (wVO<sub>2</sub>) and classify exercise intensity. Moreover, we sought to determine if estimation accuracy could be improved by including clinical variables related to patients' function and health in the estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen individuals post stroke completed treadmill walking exercises with concurrent indirect calorimetry and heart rate monitoring. Using 70% of the data, forward selection regression with repeated k-fold cross-validation was used to build wVO<sub>2</sub> estimation equations that use heart rate alone and together with clinical variables available at the point-of-care (i.e., BMI, age, sex, and comfortable walking speed). The remaining 30% of the data were used to evaluate accuracy by comparing (1) the estimated and actual wVO<sub>2</sub> measurements and (2) the exercise intensity classifications based on metabolic equivalents (METs) calculated using the estimated and actual wVO<sub>2</sub> measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heart rate-based wVO<sub>2</sub> estimates were inaccurate (MAE = 3.11 mL O<sub>2</sub>/kg/min) and unreliable (ICC = 0.68). Incorporating BMI, age, and sex in the estimation resulted in improvements in accuracy (MAE Δ: -36.01%, MAE = 1.99 mL O<sub>2</sub>/kg/min) and reliability (ICC Δ: +20, ICC = 0.88). Improved exercise intensity classifications were also observed, with higher accuracy (Δ: +29.85%, from 0.67 to 0.87), kappa (Δ: +108.33%, from 0.36 to 0.75), sensitivity (Δ: +30.43%, from 0.46 to 0.60), and specificity (Δ: +17.95%, from 0.78 to 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In people post stroke, heart rate-based wVO<sub>2</sub> estimations are inaccurate but can be substantially improved by incorporating clinical variables readily available at the point of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"11 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673045/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121250\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11121250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:间接量热法是基于耗氧量(VO2, mL O2/min)测量能量消耗和运动强度的金标准现场测试技术。虽然心率经常被用作VO2的代表,但由于心率-VO2关系的变化,中风后基于心率的VO2估计可能不准确。我们的目的是评估中风后使用心率估计相对步行VO2 (wVO2)和分类运动强度的准确性。此外,我们试图确定是否可以通过在估计中包括与患者功能和健康相关的临床变量来提高估计的准确性。方法:16例脑卒中患者完成跑步机步行训练,同时进行间接热量测量和心率监测。使用70%的数据,使用重复k-fold交叉验证的正向选择回归来构建wVO2估计方程,该方程单独使用心率并与护理点可用的临床变量(即BMI,年龄,性别和舒适的步行速度)一起使用。其余30%的数据用于通过比较(1)估计的和实际的wVO2测量值和(2)基于代谢当量(METs)计算的运动强度分类来评估准确性,这些代谢当量是使用估计的和实际的wVO2测量值计算的。结果:基于心率的wVO2估计不准确(MAE = 3.11 mL O2/kg/min)且不可靠(ICC = 0.68)。在估计中纳入BMI、年龄和性别可提高准确性(MAE Δ: -36.01%, MAE = 1.99 mL O2/kg/min)和可靠性(ICC Δ: +20, ICC = 0.88)。运动强度分类也得到了改进,准确率(Δ: +29.85%,从0.67到0.87)、kappa (Δ: +108.33%,从0.36到0.75)、灵敏度(Δ: +30.43%,从0.46到0.60)和特异性(Δ: +17.95%,从0.78到0.92)均有所提高。结论:在中风后的人群中,基于心率的wVO2估计是不准确的,但可以通过纳入护理点随时可用的临床变量来大大改善。
Enhancing Heart Rate-Based Estimation of Energy Expenditure and Exercise Intensity in Patients Post Stroke.
Background: Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard field-testing technique for measuring energy expenditure and exercise intensity based on the volume of oxygen consumed (VO2, mL O2/min). Although heart rate is often used as a proxy for VO2, heart rate-based estimates of VO2 may be inaccurate after stroke due to changes in the heart rate-VO2 relationship. Our objective was to evaluate in people post stroke the accuracy of using heart rate to estimate relative walking VO2 (wVO2) and classify exercise intensity. Moreover, we sought to determine if estimation accuracy could be improved by including clinical variables related to patients' function and health in the estimation.
Methods: Sixteen individuals post stroke completed treadmill walking exercises with concurrent indirect calorimetry and heart rate monitoring. Using 70% of the data, forward selection regression with repeated k-fold cross-validation was used to build wVO2 estimation equations that use heart rate alone and together with clinical variables available at the point-of-care (i.e., BMI, age, sex, and comfortable walking speed). The remaining 30% of the data were used to evaluate accuracy by comparing (1) the estimated and actual wVO2 measurements and (2) the exercise intensity classifications based on metabolic equivalents (METs) calculated using the estimated and actual wVO2 measurements.
Results: Heart rate-based wVO2 estimates were inaccurate (MAE = 3.11 mL O2/kg/min) and unreliable (ICC = 0.68). Incorporating BMI, age, and sex in the estimation resulted in improvements in accuracy (MAE Δ: -36.01%, MAE = 1.99 mL O2/kg/min) and reliability (ICC Δ: +20, ICC = 0.88). Improved exercise intensity classifications were also observed, with higher accuracy (Δ: +29.85%, from 0.67 to 0.87), kappa (Δ: +108.33%, from 0.36 to 0.75), sensitivity (Δ: +30.43%, from 0.46 to 0.60), and specificity (Δ: +17.95%, from 0.78 to 0.92).
Conclusions: In people post stroke, heart rate-based wVO2 estimations are inaccurate but can be substantially improved by incorporating clinical variables readily available at the point of care.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering