圈养和野生鼩鼱大脑的基因表达比较揭示了圈养的影响。

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Biology Letters Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2024.0478
Maria Alejandra Bedoya Duque, William R Thomas, Dina K N Dechmann, John Nieland, Cecilia Baldoni, Dominik von Elverfeldt, Marion Muturi, Angelique P Corthals, Liliana M Dávalos
{"title":"圈养和野生鼩鼱大脑的基因表达比较揭示了圈养的影响。","authors":"Maria Alejandra Bedoya Duque, William R Thomas, Dina K N Dechmann, John Nieland, Cecilia Baldoni, Dominik von Elverfeldt, Marion Muturi, Angelique P Corthals, Liliana M Dávalos","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2024.0478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compared with their free-ranging counterparts, wild animals in captivity experience different conditions with lasting physiological and behavioural effects. Although shifts in gene expression are expected to occur upstream of these phenotypes, we found no previous gene expression comparisons of captive versus free-ranging mammals. We assessed gene expression profiles of three brain regions (cortex, olfactory bulb and hippocampus) of wild shrews (<i>Sorex araneus</i>) compared with shrews kept in captivity for two months and undertook sample dropout to examine robustness given limited sample sizes. Consistent with captivity effects, we found hundreds of differentially expressed genes in all three brain regions, 104 overlapping across all three, that enriched pathways associated with neurodegenerative disease, oxidative phosphorylation and genes encoding ribosomal proteins. In the shrew, transcriptomic changes detected under captivity resemble responses in several human pathologies, including major depressive disorder and neurodegeneration. While interpretations of individual genes are tempered by small sample sizes, we propose captivity influences brain gene expression and function and can confound analyses of natural processes in wild individuals under captive conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"21 1","pages":"20240478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gene expression comparisons between captive and wild shrew brains reveal captivity effects.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alejandra Bedoya Duque, William R Thomas, Dina K N Dechmann, John Nieland, Cecilia Baldoni, Dominik von Elverfeldt, Marion Muturi, Angelique P Corthals, Liliana M Dávalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsbl.2024.0478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Compared with their free-ranging counterparts, wild animals in captivity experience different conditions with lasting physiological and behavioural effects. Although shifts in gene expression are expected to occur upstream of these phenotypes, we found no previous gene expression comparisons of captive versus free-ranging mammals. We assessed gene expression profiles of three brain regions (cortex, olfactory bulb and hippocampus) of wild shrews (<i>Sorex araneus</i>) compared with shrews kept in captivity for two months and undertook sample dropout to examine robustness given limited sample sizes. Consistent with captivity effects, we found hundreds of differentially expressed genes in all three brain regions, 104 overlapping across all three, that enriched pathways associated with neurodegenerative disease, oxidative phosphorylation and genes encoding ribosomal proteins. In the shrew, transcriptomic changes detected under captivity resemble responses in several human pathologies, including major depressive disorder and neurodegeneration. While interpretations of individual genes are tempered by small sample sizes, we propose captivity influences brain gene expression and function and can confound analyses of natural processes in wild individuals under captive conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Letters\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"20240478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706642/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0478\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2024.0478","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与自由放养的动物相比,圈养的野生动物经历了不同的生理和行为影响。虽然基因表达的变化预计会发生在这些表型的上游,但我们没有发现圈养和自由放养哺乳动物的基因表达比较。我们评估了野生鼩鼱(Sorex araneus)的三个大脑区域(皮质、嗅球和海马体)的基因表达谱,并将其与圈养两个月的鼩鼱进行了比较,并在有限的样本量下进行了样本剔除以检验稳健性。与圈养效应一致,我们在所有三个大脑区域中发现了数百个差异表达基因,其中104个在所有三个区域重叠,这些基因丰富了与神经退行性疾病、氧化磷酸化和编码核糖体蛋白的基因相关的途径。在鼩鼱中,在圈养条件下检测到的转录组学变化类似于几种人类疾病的反应,包括重度抑郁症和神经变性。虽然个体基因的解释受到小样本量的影响,但我们认为圈养会影响大脑基因的表达和功能,并可能混淆圈养条件下野生个体的自然过程分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gene expression comparisons between captive and wild shrew brains reveal captivity effects.

Compared with their free-ranging counterparts, wild animals in captivity experience different conditions with lasting physiological and behavioural effects. Although shifts in gene expression are expected to occur upstream of these phenotypes, we found no previous gene expression comparisons of captive versus free-ranging mammals. We assessed gene expression profiles of three brain regions (cortex, olfactory bulb and hippocampus) of wild shrews (Sorex araneus) compared with shrews kept in captivity for two months and undertook sample dropout to examine robustness given limited sample sizes. Consistent with captivity effects, we found hundreds of differentially expressed genes in all three brain regions, 104 overlapping across all three, that enriched pathways associated with neurodegenerative disease, oxidative phosphorylation and genes encoding ribosomal proteins. In the shrew, transcriptomic changes detected under captivity resemble responses in several human pathologies, including major depressive disorder and neurodegeneration. While interpretations of individual genes are tempered by small sample sizes, we propose captivity influences brain gene expression and function and can confound analyses of natural processes in wild individuals under captive conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Letters
Biology Letters 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.
期刊最新文献
Selection for tameness alters play-like behaviour in red junglefowl in line with effects of domestication. The interconnected nature of multiple threats is impacting freshwater biodiversity. Growing up with chronic traffic noise exposure leads to transient but not long-term noise tolerance in a songbird. Hidden population turnover of small odontocetes in the northwestern North Pacific during the Holocene. Fish reproductive phenology shifts with increasing temperature and year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1