普通病房手术后患者生命体征的持续监测:述评。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045
Ashish K Khanna, Moritz Flick, Bernd Saugel
{"title":"普通病房手术后患者生命体征的持续监测:述评。","authors":"Ashish K Khanna, Moritz Flick, Bernd Saugel","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most postoperative deaths occur on general wards, often linked to complications associated with untreated changes in vital signs. Monitoring in these units is typically intermittent checks each shift or maximally every 4-6 h, which misses prolonged periods of subtle changes in physiology that can herald a critical downstream event. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is therefore intuitively necessary for patient safety. The past five decades have seen monitoring systems evolve rapidly, and today entirely wireless, wearable, and portable continuous surveillance of vital signs is possible on general wards. Introduction of this technology has the potential to modify both the sensing (afferent) and response (efferent) limbs of monitoring, and will allow earlier detection of vital signs perturbations. But this comes with challenges, including but not limited to issues with connectivity, data handling, alarm fatigue, information overload, and lack of meaningful clinical interventions. Evidence from before and after studies and retrospective propensity-matched data suggests that continuous ward monitoring decreases the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, rapid response calls, and in some instances, mortality. This review summarises the history of general ward monitoring and describes future directions, including opportunities to implement these devices using artificial intelligence, pattern detection, and user-friendly interfaces. Pragmatic, well designed and appropriately powered trials, and real-world implementation data are necessary to make continuous monitoring standard practice at every hospital bed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous vital sign monitoring of patients recovering from surgery on general wards: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Ashish K Khanna, Moritz Flick, Bernd Saugel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most postoperative deaths occur on general wards, often linked to complications associated with untreated changes in vital signs. Monitoring in these units is typically intermittent checks each shift or maximally every 4-6 h, which misses prolonged periods of subtle changes in physiology that can herald a critical downstream event. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is therefore intuitively necessary for patient safety. The past five decades have seen monitoring systems evolve rapidly, and today entirely wireless, wearable, and portable continuous surveillance of vital signs is possible on general wards. Introduction of this technology has the potential to modify both the sensing (afferent) and response (efferent) limbs of monitoring, and will allow earlier detection of vital signs perturbations. But this comes with challenges, including but not limited to issues with connectivity, data handling, alarm fatigue, information overload, and lack of meaningful clinical interventions. Evidence from before and after studies and retrospective propensity-matched data suggests that continuous ward monitoring decreases the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, rapid response calls, and in some instances, mortality. This review summarises the history of general ward monitoring and describes future directions, including opportunities to implement these devices using artificial intelligence, pattern detection, and user-friendly interfaces. Pragmatic, well designed and appropriately powered trials, and real-world implementation data are necessary to make continuous monitoring standard practice at every hospital bed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数术后死亡发生在普通病房,通常与未经治疗的生命体征变化相关的并发症有关。这些装置的监测通常是每班间歇检查,或最多每4-6小时检查一次,这会错过长时间的生理细微变化,这些变化可能预示着关键的下游事件。因此,从直觉上讲,持续监测生命体征对于患者安全是必要的。在过去的五十年里,监测系统发展迅速,今天,在普通病房,完全无线、可穿戴和便携式的生命体征连续监测成为可能。这项技术的引入有可能改变监测的传感(传入)和响应(传出)分支,并将允许更早地检测生命体征扰动。但这也带来了挑战,包括但不限于连接、数据处理、警报疲劳、信息过载以及缺乏有意义的临床干预等问题。研究前后的证据和回顾性倾向匹配数据表明,持续的病房监测降低了重症监护病房(ICU)入院的风险、快速反应呼叫,在某些情况下还降低了死亡率。这篇综述总结了一般病房监测的历史,并描述了未来的方向,包括使用人工智能、模式检测和用户友好界面实现这些设备的机会。要使持续监测成为医院病床上的标准做法,就必须有务实的、设计良好的、有适当动力的试验和真实世界的实施数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous vital sign monitoring of patients recovering from surgery on general wards: a narrative review.

Most postoperative deaths occur on general wards, often linked to complications associated with untreated changes in vital signs. Monitoring in these units is typically intermittent checks each shift or maximally every 4-6 h, which misses prolonged periods of subtle changes in physiology that can herald a critical downstream event. Continuous monitoring of vital signs is therefore intuitively necessary for patient safety. The past five decades have seen monitoring systems evolve rapidly, and today entirely wireless, wearable, and portable continuous surveillance of vital signs is possible on general wards. Introduction of this technology has the potential to modify both the sensing (afferent) and response (efferent) limbs of monitoring, and will allow earlier detection of vital signs perturbations. But this comes with challenges, including but not limited to issues with connectivity, data handling, alarm fatigue, information overload, and lack of meaningful clinical interventions. Evidence from before and after studies and retrospective propensity-matched data suggests that continuous ward monitoring decreases the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, rapid response calls, and in some instances, mortality. This review summarises the history of general ward monitoring and describes future directions, including opportunities to implement these devices using artificial intelligence, pattern detection, and user-friendly interfaces. Pragmatic, well designed and appropriately powered trials, and real-world implementation data are necessary to make continuous monitoring standard practice at every hospital bed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
The number of central nervous system-driven symptoms predicts subsequent chronic primary pain: evidence from UK Biobank. The debate rages on: physician-assisted suicide in an ethical light. Response to Br J Anaesth 2024; 133: 1352-3. Two-person verbal check to confirm tracheal intubation: evaluation of practice changes to prevent unrecognised oesophageal intubation. Clinical team flow in the perioperative environment: a qualitative single-centre study. Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1