Jonathan Kluger, Gaëlle Romain, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Scott Grubman, Carmen Pajarillo, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen
{"title":"定义经股颈动脉支架植入术后有意义的健康状态改变的阈值。","authors":"Jonathan Kluger, Gaëlle Romain, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Scott Grubman, Carmen Pajarillo, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating health status changes following transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS) is essential for assessing procedural success, but meaningful clinical changes are unknown. We aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and quantify health status improvement or worsening rates after TF-CAS using the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAPPHIRE registry included patients undergoing TF-CAS from 2010 to 2014 for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Baseline and 30-day health status were assessed using the SF-36 (2010-2012) for mental and physical component scores (MCS and PCS) and the EQ-5D (2012-2014) for 3 L Index and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. For each score, we calculated the 30-day distribution-based MCID (0.5*standard deviations of baseline health status) by symptom status and the overall cohort (symptom-weighted MCIDs). The changes were then categorized as improved, deteriorated, or unchanged based on these MCIDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health status was assessed using the EQ-5D in 3930 patients and the SF-36 in 3018 patients (27.7% and 30.5% symptomatic, respectively). The MCIDs by symptom status were close, hence weighted MCIDs of 0.09 (Index), 11.00 (VAS), 4.70 (PCS), and 5.40 (MCS) were established. Across all subscales, 21.2%-26.1% of patients improved, 10.5%-16.7% worsened, and 57.2%-66.1% unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We established thresholds for meaningful health status changes after TF-CAS using common generic instruments. At 30 days after TF-CAS, 70%-80% of patients no change or worsened, while 20%-30% improved. Carotid artery disease-specific instrument would provide better insights into of TF-CAS effects on health status.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Thresholds for Meaningful Health Status Changes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Kluger, Gaëlle Romain, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Scott Grubman, Carmen Pajarillo, Jacob Cleman, Lindsey Scierka, Kim G Smolderen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.31410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluating health status changes following transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS) is essential for assessing procedural success, but meaningful clinical changes are unknown. We aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and quantify health status improvement or worsening rates after TF-CAS using the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SAPPHIRE registry included patients undergoing TF-CAS from 2010 to 2014 for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Baseline and 30-day health status were assessed using the SF-36 (2010-2012) for mental and physical component scores (MCS and PCS) and the EQ-5D (2012-2014) for 3 L Index and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. For each score, we calculated the 30-day distribution-based MCID (0.5*standard deviations of baseline health status) by symptom status and the overall cohort (symptom-weighted MCIDs). The changes were then categorized as improved, deteriorated, or unchanged based on these MCIDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health status was assessed using the EQ-5D in 3930 patients and the SF-36 in 3018 patients (27.7% and 30.5% symptomatic, respectively). The MCIDs by symptom status were close, hence weighted MCIDs of 0.09 (Index), 11.00 (VAS), 4.70 (PCS), and 5.40 (MCS) were established. Across all subscales, 21.2%-26.1% of patients improved, 10.5%-16.7% worsened, and 57.2%-66.1% unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We established thresholds for meaningful health status changes after TF-CAS using common generic instruments. At 30 days after TF-CAS, 70%-80% of patients no change or worsened, while 20%-30% improved. Carotid artery disease-specific instrument would provide better insights into of TF-CAS effects on health status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31410\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defining Thresholds for Meaningful Health Status Changes Following Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.
Background: Evaluating health status changes following transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TF-CAS) is essential for assessing procedural success, but meaningful clinical changes are unknown. We aimed to determine minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and quantify health status improvement or worsening rates after TF-CAS using the Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) registry data.
Methods: The SAPPHIRE registry included patients undergoing TF-CAS from 2010 to 2014 for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Baseline and 30-day health status were assessed using the SF-36 (2010-2012) for mental and physical component scores (MCS and PCS) and the EQ-5D (2012-2014) for 3 L Index and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores. For each score, we calculated the 30-day distribution-based MCID (0.5*standard deviations of baseline health status) by symptom status and the overall cohort (symptom-weighted MCIDs). The changes were then categorized as improved, deteriorated, or unchanged based on these MCIDs.
Results: Health status was assessed using the EQ-5D in 3930 patients and the SF-36 in 3018 patients (27.7% and 30.5% symptomatic, respectively). The MCIDs by symptom status were close, hence weighted MCIDs of 0.09 (Index), 11.00 (VAS), 4.70 (PCS), and 5.40 (MCS) were established. Across all subscales, 21.2%-26.1% of patients improved, 10.5%-16.7% worsened, and 57.2%-66.1% unchanged.
Conclusions: We established thresholds for meaningful health status changes after TF-CAS using common generic instruments. At 30 days after TF-CAS, 70%-80% of patients no change or worsened, while 20%-30% improved. Carotid artery disease-specific instrument would provide better insights into of TF-CAS effects on health status.
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.