K Verkerk, L J Zeverijn, J van de Haar, P Roepman, B S Geurts, A C Spiekman, V van der Noort, J M van Berge Henegouwen, L R Hoes, H van der Wijngaart, A M L Jansen, W W J de Leng, A J Gelderblom, H M W Verheul, E E Voest
{"title":"途径改变负荷是靶向治疗结果的泛癌症决定因素:来自药物再发现方案(DRUP)的结果。","authors":"K Verkerk, L J Zeverijn, J van de Haar, P Roepman, B S Geurts, A C Spiekman, V van der Noort, J M van Berge Henegouwen, L R Hoes, H van der Wijngaart, A M L Jansen, W W J de Leng, A J Gelderblom, H M W Verheul, E E Voest","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with cancer exhibit primary or rapid secondary resistance to targeted therapy (TT). We hypothesized that a higher number of altered oncogenic signaling pathways [pathway alteration load (PAL)] would reduce the benefit of TT which only intervenes in one pathway. This hypothesis was tested in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>DRUP is a prospective, pan-cancer, non-randomized clinical trial (NCT02925234) that treats patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancer and an actionable molecular profile using matched off-label targeted and immunotherapies. All patients treated with TT with available clinical outcomes and whole genome sequencing were included. PAL was determined based on driver gene alterations and correlated with clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were validated in the independent Hartwig Medical database of metastatic cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 154 patients treated with TT, the median PAL was 3. Patients with a PAL below median (n = 60) demonstrated a higher CBR (41.7% versus 25.5%, odds ratio 0.48, P = 0.051), longer PFS [median 4.7 versus 2.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020] and OS (median 13.7 versus 5.6 months, aHR 3.80, P < 0.001) compared with those with PAL ≥3. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients in the Hartwig database showed similar results for CBR (54.2% versus 36.7%, odds ratio 2.04, P = 0.009) and PFS (7.0 versus 4.2 months, aHR 1.55, P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our population, PAL emerged as a pan-cancer determinant of outcome to TT. Our findings support refined patient selection for TT and highlight the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies in patients with multiple affected pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"104112"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pathway alteration load is a pan-cancer determinant of outcome of targeted therapies: results from the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).\",\"authors\":\"K Verkerk, L J Zeverijn, J van de Haar, P Roepman, B S Geurts, A C Spiekman, V van der Noort, J M van Berge Henegouwen, L R Hoes, H van der Wijngaart, A M L Jansen, W W J de Leng, A J Gelderblom, H M W Verheul, E E Voest\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with cancer exhibit primary or rapid secondary resistance to targeted therapy (TT). We hypothesized that a higher number of altered oncogenic signaling pathways [pathway alteration load (PAL)] would reduce the benefit of TT which only intervenes in one pathway. This hypothesis was tested in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>DRUP is a prospective, pan-cancer, non-randomized clinical trial (NCT02925234) that treats patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancer and an actionable molecular profile using matched off-label targeted and immunotherapies. All patients treated with TT with available clinical outcomes and whole genome sequencing were included. PAL was determined based on driver gene alterations and correlated with clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were validated in the independent Hartwig Medical database of metastatic cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 154 patients treated with TT, the median PAL was 3. Patients with a PAL below median (n = 60) demonstrated a higher CBR (41.7% versus 25.5%, odds ratio 0.48, P = 0.051), longer PFS [median 4.7 versus 2.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020] and OS (median 13.7 versus 5.6 months, aHR 3.80, P < 0.001) compared with those with PAL ≥3. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients in the Hartwig database showed similar results for CBR (54.2% versus 36.7%, odds ratio 2.04, P = 0.009) and PFS (7.0 versus 4.2 months, aHR 1.55, P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our population, PAL emerged as a pan-cancer determinant of outcome to TT. Our findings support refined patient selection for TT and highlight the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies in patients with multiple affected pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Open\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"104112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:许多癌症患者对靶向治疗(TT)表现出原发性或快速继发性耐药。我们假设,更多的致癌信号通路改变[通路改变负荷(PAL)]会降低TT的益处,因为TT只干预一条通路。这一假设在药物再发现方案(DRUP)中得到了验证。患者和方法:DRUP是一项前瞻性、泛癌症、非随机临床试验(NCT02925234),使用匹配的标签外靶向和免疫疗法治疗难治性转移性癌症患者和可操作的分子谱。所有接受TT治疗的患者均具有可用的临床结果和全基因组测序。PAL是根据驱动基因改变来确定的,并与临床获益率(CBR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相关。结果在独立的Hartwig医学转移性癌症数据库中得到验证。结果:154例接受TT治疗的患者中位PAL为3。与PAL≥3的患者相比,PAL低于中位数的患者(n = 60)表现出更高的CBR(41.7%对25.5%,优势比0.48,P = 0.051),更长的PFS(中位数4.7对2.9个月,校正风险比(aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020)和OS(中位数13.7对5.6个月,aHR 3.80, P < 0.001)。Hartwig数据库中的158例患者在CBR(54.2%对36.7%,优势比2.04,P = 0.009)和PFS(7.0对4.2个月,aHR 1.55, P = 0.009)方面显示出相似的结果。结论:在我们的人群中,PAL成为TT预后的泛癌症决定因素。我们的研究结果为TT患者的精细选择提供了支持,并强调了对有多种影响途径的患者采用联合治疗策略的基本原理。
The pathway alteration load is a pan-cancer determinant of outcome of targeted therapies: results from the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).
Background: Many patients with cancer exhibit primary or rapid secondary resistance to targeted therapy (TT). We hypothesized that a higher number of altered oncogenic signaling pathways [pathway alteration load (PAL)] would reduce the benefit of TT which only intervenes in one pathway. This hypothesis was tested in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP).
Patients and methods: DRUP is a prospective, pan-cancer, non-randomized clinical trial (NCT02925234) that treats patients with therapy-refractory metastatic cancer and an actionable molecular profile using matched off-label targeted and immunotherapies. All patients treated with TT with available clinical outcomes and whole genome sequencing were included. PAL was determined based on driver gene alterations and correlated with clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were validated in the independent Hartwig Medical database of metastatic cancers.
Results: In 154 patients treated with TT, the median PAL was 3. Patients with a PAL below median (n = 60) demonstrated a higher CBR (41.7% versus 25.5%, odds ratio 0.48, P = 0.051), longer PFS [median 4.7 versus 2.9 months, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.70, P = 0.020] and OS (median 13.7 versus 5.6 months, aHR 3.80, P < 0.001) compared with those with PAL ≥3. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients in the Hartwig database showed similar results for CBR (54.2% versus 36.7%, odds ratio 2.04, P = 0.009) and PFS (7.0 versus 4.2 months, aHR 1.55, P = 0.009).
Conclusions: In our population, PAL emerged as a pan-cancer determinant of outcome to TT. Our findings support refined patient selection for TT and highlight the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies in patients with multiple affected pathways.
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.