Computational modeling of fear and stress responses: validation using consolidated fear and stress protocols.

Dysfunction in fear and stress responses is intrinsically linked to various neurological diseases, including anxiety disorders, depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Previous studies using in vivo models with Immediate-Extinction Deficit (IED) and Stress Enhanced Fear Learning (SEFL) protocols have provided valuable insights into these mechanisms and aided the development of new therapeutic approaches. However, assessing these dysfunctions in animal subjects using IED and SEFL protocols can cause significant pain and suffering. To advance the understanding of fear and stress, this study presents a biologically and behaviorally plausible computational architecture that integrates several subregions of key brain structures, such as the amygdala, hippocampus, and medial prefrontal cortex. Additionally, the model incorporates stress hormone curves and employs spiking neural networks with conductance-based integrate-and-fire neurons. The proposed approach was validated using the well-established Contextual Fear Conditioning paradigm and subsequently tested with IED and SEFL protocols. The results confirmed that higher intensity aversive stimuli result in more robust and persistent fear memories, making extinction more challenging. They also underscore the importance of the timing of extinction and the significant influence of stress. To our knowledge, this is the first instance of computational modeling being applied to IED and SEFL protocols. This study validates our computational model's complexity and biological realism in analyzing responses to fear and stress through fear conditioning, IED, and SEFL protocols. Rather than providing new biological insights, the primary contribution of this work lies in its methodological innovation, demonstrating that complex, biologically plausible neural architectures can effectively replicate established findings in fear and stress research. By simulating protocols typically conducted in vivo-often involving significant pain and suffering-in an insilico environment, our model offers a promising tool for studying fear-related mechanisms. These findings support the potential of computational models to reduce the reliance on animal testing while setting the stage for new therapeutic approaches.