生物制剂在中国治疗活动性银屑病关节炎:网络荟萃分析和成本-效果分析

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2025.2451740
Ouyang Xie, Meiyu Wu, Andong Li, Kehui Meng, Heng Xiang, Chongqing Tan, Liubao Peng, Yan Ge, Xiaomin Wan
{"title":"生物制剂在中国治疗活动性银屑病关节炎:网络荟萃分析和成本-效果分析","authors":"Ouyang Xie, Meiyu Wu, Andong Li, Kehui Meng, Heng Xiang, Chongqing Tan, Liubao Peng, Yan Ge, Xiaomin Wan","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2451740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologics are recommended for use in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) after the failure of conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). However, compared to csDMARDs, biologics are significantly more expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for active PsA patients who have failed treatment with csDMARDs, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A discrete event simulation model was constructed to estimate health and economic outcomes of patients. The seven biologics recommended by the Chinese psoriasis treatment guidelines were included in the evaluation. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to ensure that our results were robust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results found that compared to the standard of care (SoC) and all other biologics strategies, secukinumab (SEC) had the highest quality-adjusted life years, and at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US $38,161 per QALY, SEC was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $14,968 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of this result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, biologics are estimated to be cost-effective compared to SoC. Among these, SEC is the most cost-effective option.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biologics in the treatment of active Psoriatic arthritis in China: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ouyang Xie, Meiyu Wu, Andong Li, Kehui Meng, Heng Xiang, Chongqing Tan, Liubao Peng, Yan Ge, Xiaomin Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2451740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologics are recommended for use in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) after the failure of conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). However, compared to csDMARDs, biologics are significantly more expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for active PsA patients who have failed treatment with csDMARDs, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A discrete event simulation model was constructed to estimate health and economic outcomes of patients. The seven biologics recommended by the Chinese psoriasis treatment guidelines were included in the evaluation. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to ensure that our results were robust.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results found that compared to the standard of care (SoC) and all other biologics strategies, secukinumab (SEC) had the highest quality-adjusted life years, and at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US $38,161 per QALY, SEC was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $14,968 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of this result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, biologics are estimated to be cost-effective compared to SoC. Among these, SEC is the most cost-effective option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2451740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2451740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物制剂被推荐用于银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者在常规系统性疾病改善抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)失败后的治疗。然而,与csdmard相比,生物制剂要贵得多。本研究的目的是从中国医疗保健系统的角度,评估生物治疗csdmard治疗失败的活动性PsA患者的成本-效果。研究设计与方法:建立离散事件模拟模型来估计患者的健康和经济结果。纳入中国银屑病治疗指南推荐的7种生物制剂进行评价。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析,以确保我们的结果是稳健的。结果:我们的研究结果发现,与护理标准(SoC)和所有其他生物制剂策略相比,secukinumab (SEC)具有最高的质量调整生命年,并且在每个QALY的支付意愿(WTP)阈值为38,161美元时,SEC是最具成本效益的选择,每个QALY的增量成本效益比为14,968美元。单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析证实了该结果的稳健性。结论:从中国医疗保健系统的角度来看,与SoC相比,生物制剂估计具有成本效益。其中,SEC是最具成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biologics in the treatment of active Psoriatic arthritis in China: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Background: Biologics are recommended for use in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) after the failure of conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). However, compared to csDMARDs, biologics are significantly more expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for active PsA patients who have failed treatment with csDMARDs, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Research design and methods: A discrete event simulation model was constructed to estimate health and economic outcomes of patients. The seven biologics recommended by the Chinese psoriasis treatment guidelines were included in the evaluation. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to ensure that our results were robust.

Results: Our results found that compared to the standard of care (SoC) and all other biologics strategies, secukinumab (SEC) had the highest quality-adjusted life years, and at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US $38,161 per QALY, SEC was the most cost-effective option, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $14,968 per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robust of this result.

Conclusions: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, biologics are estimated to be cost-effective compared to SoC. Among these, SEC is the most cost-effective option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Preferences of nurses in the United Kingdom for attributes of pediatric hexavalent vaccines: a discrete-choice experiment. Patient-relevance of outcome measures in breast cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional comparative analysis of patient preferences and trials conducted between 2014 and 2024. Evaluation of biological drug consumption in Italy during 2022: a comparative analysis between two healthcare facilities. Cost comparison of F(ab')2 and Fab antivenoms for pit viper envenomation in the United States: a real-world analysis. Autologous stem-cell transplantation and maintenance therapy for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a network meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1