印度三级中心的转移性胆囊癌患者口服卡培他滨或不口服卡培他滨的最佳支持治疗观察性研究

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1200/GO-24-00341
Abhinav Srivastava, Shagun Misra, Neeraj Rastogi, Vishwas Kapoor, Shaleen Kumar
{"title":"印度三级中心的转移性胆囊癌患者口服卡培他滨或不口服卡培他滨的最佳支持治疗观察性研究","authors":"Abhinav Srivastava, Shagun Misra, Neeraj Rastogi, Vishwas Kapoor, Shaleen Kumar","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer receiving oral capecitabine (X) with best supportive care (BSC) and BSC alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 were accrued and assigned to either arm A or B. Assignment to these two arms was based on physician/patient discretion. Arm A received oral capecitabine 825 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice a day d1-14, repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles with BSC, and arm B received BSC alone. The Kaplan-Meier method computed OS and comparison was using a log-rank test. QOL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The linear mixed-effects model was used for the longitudinal analysis of QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 2020 and April 2022, 64 patients diagnosed with metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and KPS ≥70 were accrued in the study, and 32 patients were assigned to each arm. In arm A versus B, the median age was 52 versus 55 (<i>P</i> = .21); the median KPS was 80 versus 70 (<i>P</i> = .008). The median OS in arm A versus B was 3.4 versus 2 months (<i>P</i> = .001). Grade 1-2 vomiting and diarrhea were seen in 50% versus 78% (<i>P</i> = .041) and 59% versus 9.3% (<i>P</i> = .01) patients in arm A versus B, respectively. Grade 1-2 hand-foot syndrome was seen in 12 (37.5%) patients in arm A. Dynamic changes showed an improvement in pain in the linear mixed model with a significant difference between the arms (<i>P</i> = .011); arm A experienced a significant improvement in pain over time (arm × time <i>P</i> = .020). Global QOL improved over time (<i>P</i> = .038) with parallel improvement between arms (arm × time <i>P</i> = .490).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with BSC alone, patients who receive X + BSC experience an OS improvement of 1.4 months and better pain control without grade 3 toxicities or negative impact on QOL.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observational Study of Best Supportive Care With or Without Oral Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma at a Tertiary Center in India.\",\"authors\":\"Abhinav Srivastava, Shagun Misra, Neeraj Rastogi, Vishwas Kapoor, Shaleen Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO-24-00341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer receiving oral capecitabine (X) with best supportive care (BSC) and BSC alone.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 were accrued and assigned to either arm A or B. Assignment to these two arms was based on physician/patient discretion. Arm A received oral capecitabine 825 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice a day d1-14, repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles with BSC, and arm B received BSC alone. The Kaplan-Meier method computed OS and comparison was using a log-rank test. QOL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The linear mixed-effects model was used for the longitudinal analysis of QOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 2020 and April 2022, 64 patients diagnosed with metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and KPS ≥70 were accrued in the study, and 32 patients were assigned to each arm. In arm A versus B, the median age was 52 versus 55 (<i>P</i> = .21); the median KPS was 80 versus 70 (<i>P</i> = .008). The median OS in arm A versus B was 3.4 versus 2 months (<i>P</i> = .001). Grade 1-2 vomiting and diarrhea were seen in 50% versus 78% (<i>P</i> = .041) and 59% versus 9.3% (<i>P</i> = .01) patients in arm A versus B, respectively. Grade 1-2 hand-foot syndrome was seen in 12 (37.5%) patients in arm A. Dynamic changes showed an improvement in pain in the linear mixed model with a significant difference between the arms (<i>P</i> = .011); arm A experienced a significant improvement in pain over time (arm × time <i>P</i> = .020). Global QOL improved over time (<i>P</i> = .038) with parallel improvement between arms (arm × time <i>P</i> = .490).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with BSC alone, patients who receive X + BSC experience an OS improvement of 1.4 months and better pain control without grade 3 toxicities or negative impact on QOL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2400341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00341\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较口服卡培他滨(X)联合最佳支持治疗(BSC)和单独使用BSC治疗的转移性胆囊癌患者的总生存期(OS)、毒性和生活质量(QOL)。材料和方法:对Karnofsky性能状态(KPS)≥70的转移性胆囊癌患者进行统计,并将其分配到A组或b组。这两个组的分配基于医生/患者的判断。A组接受口服卡培他滨825 mg/m2,每天2次,d1-14,每3周重复一次,联合BSC,共6个周期,B组单独接受BSC。Kaplan-Meier法计算OS,比较采用log-rank检验。使用欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织生活质量问卷C30在基线、3个月和6个月进行测量。采用线性混合效应模型对生活质量进行纵向分析。结果:在2020年12月至2022年4月期间,研究中累积了64例诊断为转移性胆囊癌且KPS≥70的患者,每组32例患者。A组和B组中位年龄分别为52岁和55岁(P = 0.21);中位KPS为80 vs 70 (P = 0.008)。A组和B组的中位生存期分别为3.4个月和2个月(P = 0.001)。在A组和B组中,分别有50%和78% (P = 0.041)和59%和9.3% (P = 0.01)患者出现1-2级呕吐和腹泻。a组12例(37.5%)患者出现1-2级手足综合征,动态变化显示线性混合模型疼痛有所改善,两组间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.011);A组随着时间的推移疼痛明显改善(组×时间P = 0.020)。总体生活质量随着时间的推移而改善(P = 0.038),两组间也有平行改善(组×时间P = 0.490)。结论:与单纯BSC相比,接受X + BSC的患者的OS改善了1.4个月,疼痛控制更好,无3级毒性或对生活质量的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observational Study of Best Supportive Care With or Without Oral Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma at a Tertiary Center in India.

Purpose: To compare overall survival (OS), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer receiving oral capecitabine (X) with best supportive care (BSC) and BSC alone.

Materials and methods: Patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 were accrued and assigned to either arm A or B. Assignment to these two arms was based on physician/patient discretion. Arm A received oral capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice a day d1-14, repeated every 3 weeks for six cycles with BSC, and arm B received BSC alone. The Kaplan-Meier method computed OS and comparison was using a log-rank test. QOL was measured using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 administered at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The linear mixed-effects model was used for the longitudinal analysis of QOL.

Results: Between December 2020 and April 2022, 64 patients diagnosed with metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and KPS ≥70 were accrued in the study, and 32 patients were assigned to each arm. In arm A versus B, the median age was 52 versus 55 (P = .21); the median KPS was 80 versus 70 (P = .008). The median OS in arm A versus B was 3.4 versus 2 months (P = .001). Grade 1-2 vomiting and diarrhea were seen in 50% versus 78% (P = .041) and 59% versus 9.3% (P = .01) patients in arm A versus B, respectively. Grade 1-2 hand-foot syndrome was seen in 12 (37.5%) patients in arm A. Dynamic changes showed an improvement in pain in the linear mixed model with a significant difference between the arms (P = .011); arm A experienced a significant improvement in pain over time (arm × time P = .020). Global QOL improved over time (P = .038) with parallel improvement between arms (arm × time P = .490).

Conclusion: Compared with BSC alone, patients who receive X + BSC experience an OS improvement of 1.4 months and better pain control without grade 3 toxicities or negative impact on QOL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genomic Testing in Brazil: Navigating Challenges and Harnessing Opportunities for Global Health Impact. Treatment Pattern and Outcome of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Resource-Constrained Countries: Experience at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Treatment Patterns for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Across Eight Mexican Centers: The ALEBRIJE Study. Erratum: Radiation Therapist Education and Training: An International Survey. Pacific Peoples' Experiences of Cancer and Its Treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand Through Talanoa: A Qualitative Study of Samoan and Tongan Participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1