{"title":"评估ChatGPT在哮喘常识中的准确性和可靠性:人工智能在公共卫生教育中的应用","authors":"Muhammad Thesa Ghozali","doi":"10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into public health education represents a pivotal advancement in medical knowledge dissemination, particularly for chronic diseases such as asthma. This study assesses the accuracy and comprehensiveness of ChatGPT, a conversational AI model, in providing asthma-related information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing a rigorous mixed-methods approach, healthcare professionals evaluated ChatGPT's responses to the Asthma General Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults (AGKQA), a standardized instrument covering various asthma-related topics. Responses were graded for accuracy and completeness and analyzed using statistical tests to assess reproducibility and consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT showed notable proficiency in conveying asthma knowledge, with flawless success in the etiology and pathophysiology categories and substantial accuracy in medication information (70%). However, limitations were noted in medication-related responses, where mixed accuracy (30%) highlights the need for further refinement of ChatGPT's capabilities to ensure reliability in critical areas of asthma education. Reproducibility analysis demonstrated a consistent 100% rate across all categories, affirming ChatGPT's reliability in delivering uniform information. Statistical analyses further underscored ChatGPT's stability and reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore ChatGPT's promise as a valuable educational tool for asthma while emphasizing the necessity of ongoing improvements to address observed limitations, particularly regarding medication-related information.</p>","PeriodicalId":15076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing ChatGPT's accuracy and reliability in asthma general knowledge: implications for artificial intelligence use in public health education.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Thesa Ghozali\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into public health education represents a pivotal advancement in medical knowledge dissemination, particularly for chronic diseases such as asthma. This study assesses the accuracy and comprehensiveness of ChatGPT, a conversational AI model, in providing asthma-related information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing a rigorous mixed-methods approach, healthcare professionals evaluated ChatGPT's responses to the Asthma General Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults (AGKQA), a standardized instrument covering various asthma-related topics. Responses were graded for accuracy and completeness and analyzed using statistical tests to assess reproducibility and consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ChatGPT showed notable proficiency in conveying asthma knowledge, with flawless success in the etiology and pathophysiology categories and substantial accuracy in medication information (70%). However, limitations were noted in medication-related responses, where mixed accuracy (30%) highlights the need for further refinement of ChatGPT's capabilities to ensure reliability in critical areas of asthma education. Reproducibility analysis demonstrated a consistent 100% rate across all categories, affirming ChatGPT's reliability in delivering uniform information. Statistical analyses further underscored ChatGPT's stability and reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore ChatGPT's promise as a valuable educational tool for asthma while emphasizing the necessity of ongoing improvements to address observed limitations, particularly regarding medication-related information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2025.2450482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing ChatGPT's accuracy and reliability in asthma general knowledge: implications for artificial intelligence use in public health education.
Background: Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into public health education represents a pivotal advancement in medical knowledge dissemination, particularly for chronic diseases such as asthma. This study assesses the accuracy and comprehensiveness of ChatGPT, a conversational AI model, in providing asthma-related information.
Methods: Employing a rigorous mixed-methods approach, healthcare professionals evaluated ChatGPT's responses to the Asthma General Knowledge Questionnaire for Adults (AGKQA), a standardized instrument covering various asthma-related topics. Responses were graded for accuracy and completeness and analyzed using statistical tests to assess reproducibility and consistency.
Results: ChatGPT showed notable proficiency in conveying asthma knowledge, with flawless success in the etiology and pathophysiology categories and substantial accuracy in medication information (70%). However, limitations were noted in medication-related responses, where mixed accuracy (30%) highlights the need for further refinement of ChatGPT's capabilities to ensure reliability in critical areas of asthma education. Reproducibility analysis demonstrated a consistent 100% rate across all categories, affirming ChatGPT's reliability in delivering uniform information. Statistical analyses further underscored ChatGPT's stability and reliability.
Conclusion: These findings underscore ChatGPT's promise as a valuable educational tool for asthma while emphasizing the necessity of ongoing improvements to address observed limitations, particularly regarding medication-related information.
期刊介绍:
Providing an authoritative open forum on asthma and related conditions, Journal of Asthma publishes clinical research around such topics as asthma management, critical and long-term care, preventative measures, environmental counselling, and patient education.