Thomas E Joiner, Morgan Robison, Jamie Manwaring, Renee D Rienecke, Daniel Le Grange, Alan Duffy, Philip S Mehler, Dan V Blalock
{"title":"情绪与焦虑障碍患者自杀意念单项评估的信度与结构效度。","authors":"Thomas E Joiner, Morgan Robison, Jamie Manwaring, Renee D Rienecke, Daniel Le Grange, Alan Duffy, Philip S Mehler, Dan V Blalock","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Single-item questionnaire assessments may be summarily dismissed by some, but it is unclear if this is warranted. We suggest here that the answer to that question depends on their reliability and construct validity. Reliability of a single-item index cannot be assessed via indices like coefficient alpha, but it can be addressed otherwise; construct validity can be assessed as it would be with any other quantitative index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 489 patients with mood and anxiety disorders, we examined the Beck Depression Inventory Item 9's (BDI-Item 9) test-retest coefficient, and its validity, in part via invariance analyses. More specifically regarding invariance analyses, we determined whether a covariance structure including a multi-item assessment of suicidal ideation was invariant with a similar structure using a single-item assessment of suicidal ideation instead.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reasonably supportive evidence emerged for the reliability and construct validity of this specific one-item index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BDI-Item 9 can reliably assess suicidal ideation when data lack multi-item assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reliability and Construct Validity of a Single-Item Assessment of Suicidal Ideation Among Patients With Mood and Anxiety Disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas E Joiner, Morgan Robison, Jamie Manwaring, Renee D Rienecke, Daniel Le Grange, Alan Duffy, Philip S Mehler, Dan V Blalock\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jclp.23768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Single-item questionnaire assessments may be summarily dismissed by some, but it is unclear if this is warranted. We suggest here that the answer to that question depends on their reliability and construct validity. Reliability of a single-item index cannot be assessed via indices like coefficient alpha, but it can be addressed otherwise; construct validity can be assessed as it would be with any other quantitative index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 489 patients with mood and anxiety disorders, we examined the Beck Depression Inventory Item 9's (BDI-Item 9) test-retest coefficient, and its validity, in part via invariance analyses. More specifically regarding invariance analyses, we determined whether a covariance structure including a multi-item assessment of suicidal ideation was invariant with a similar structure using a single-item assessment of suicidal ideation instead.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reasonably supportive evidence emerged for the reliability and construct validity of this specific one-item index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BDI-Item 9 can reliably assess suicidal ideation when data lack multi-item assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23768\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Reliability and Construct Validity of a Single-Item Assessment of Suicidal Ideation Among Patients With Mood and Anxiety Disorders.
Objective: Single-item questionnaire assessments may be summarily dismissed by some, but it is unclear if this is warranted. We suggest here that the answer to that question depends on their reliability and construct validity. Reliability of a single-item index cannot be assessed via indices like coefficient alpha, but it can be addressed otherwise; construct validity can be assessed as it would be with any other quantitative index.
Methods: In 489 patients with mood and anxiety disorders, we examined the Beck Depression Inventory Item 9's (BDI-Item 9) test-retest coefficient, and its validity, in part via invariance analyses. More specifically regarding invariance analyses, we determined whether a covariance structure including a multi-item assessment of suicidal ideation was invariant with a similar structure using a single-item assessment of suicidal ideation instead.
Results: Reasonably supportive evidence emerged for the reliability and construct validity of this specific one-item index.
Conclusions: The BDI-Item 9 can reliably assess suicidal ideation when data lack multi-item assessments.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.