液相色谱-高分辨率质谱法定量特立帕肽中肽相关杂质的验证。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116654
Daniel A Weisz, Sarah M Rogstad, Kui Zeng, Eric Pang, Ilan Geerlof-Vidavsky
{"title":"液相色谱-高分辨率质谱法定量特立帕肽中肽相关杂质的验证。","authors":"Daniel A Weisz, Sarah M Rogstad, Kui Zeng, Eric Pang, Ilan Geerlof-Vidavsky","doi":"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With recent advances in quantitative high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), there is growing interest in developing liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS methods that can simultaneously quantify numerous critical impurities in a peptide or protein drug. This approach is attractive as it could reduce the total number of methods and instruments required during product development and quality control testing, while taking advantage of the technique's high specificity and sensitivity. To investigate the feasibility of this approach for peptide drugs, an LC-HRMS method was validated for the quantification of six peptide-related impurities in teriparatide, the 34-amino acid active ingredient in Forteo. External calibration curves were constructed to correlate the peak area ratio of impurity-to-teriparatide to a known impurity abundance. The method displayed good specificity, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, repeatability, intermediate precision, and robustness. The lower limits of quantification were 0.02 % or 0.03 % of teriparatide, below the regulatory reporting threshold of 0.10 %. It was found that quantification using three isotopic peaks per peptide did not provide a significant benefit over quantification with one isotopic peak. The method was validated successfully without the impractical inclusion of an isotopically-labeled internal standard for each impurity. Future studies will be conducted to determine the method's longer-term reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":16685,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","volume":"255 ","pages":"116654"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry method to quantify peptide-related impurities in teriparatide.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel A Weisz, Sarah M Rogstad, Kui Zeng, Eric Pang, Ilan Geerlof-Vidavsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With recent advances in quantitative high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), there is growing interest in developing liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS methods that can simultaneously quantify numerous critical impurities in a peptide or protein drug. This approach is attractive as it could reduce the total number of methods and instruments required during product development and quality control testing, while taking advantage of the technique's high specificity and sensitivity. To investigate the feasibility of this approach for peptide drugs, an LC-HRMS method was validated for the quantification of six peptide-related impurities in teriparatide, the 34-amino acid active ingredient in Forteo. External calibration curves were constructed to correlate the peak area ratio of impurity-to-teriparatide to a known impurity abundance. The method displayed good specificity, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, repeatability, intermediate precision, and robustness. The lower limits of quantification were 0.02 % or 0.03 % of teriparatide, below the regulatory reporting threshold of 0.10 %. It was found that quantification using three isotopic peaks per peptide did not provide a significant benefit over quantification with one isotopic peak. The method was validated successfully without the impractical inclusion of an isotopically-labeled internal standard for each impurity. Future studies will be conducted to determine the method's longer-term reproducibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis\",\"volume\":\"255 \",\"pages\":\"116654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116654\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2024.116654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着定量高分辨率质谱法(HRMS)的最新进展,人们对开发液相色谱(LC)-HRMS方法越来越感兴趣,这种方法可以同时定量多肽或蛋白质药物中的许多关键杂质。这种方法很有吸引力,因为它可以减少产品开发和质量控制测试过程中所需的方法和仪器的总数,同时利用该技术的高特异性和灵敏度。为了考察该方法在多肽类药物中的可行性,采用LC-HRMS方法对三立帕肽(Forteo中含有34个氨基酸的活性成分)中6种多肽相关杂质进行了定量验证。构建外部校准曲线,将杂质-特立帕肽的峰面积比与已知杂质丰度相关联。该方法具有良好的特异度、灵敏度、线性度、准确度、重复性、中间精密度和鲁棒性。定量下限为特立帕肽的0.02 %或0.03 %,低于监管报告阈值0.10 %。结果发现,每个肽使用三个同位素峰的定量并不比使用一个同位素峰的定量提供显著的好处。该方法被成功地验证了,没有为每个杂质不切实际地包含同位素标记的内标。未来的研究将确定该方法的长期可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry method to quantify peptide-related impurities in teriparatide.

With recent advances in quantitative high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), there is growing interest in developing liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS methods that can simultaneously quantify numerous critical impurities in a peptide or protein drug. This approach is attractive as it could reduce the total number of methods and instruments required during product development and quality control testing, while taking advantage of the technique's high specificity and sensitivity. To investigate the feasibility of this approach for peptide drugs, an LC-HRMS method was validated for the quantification of six peptide-related impurities in teriparatide, the 34-amino acid active ingredient in Forteo. External calibration curves were constructed to correlate the peak area ratio of impurity-to-teriparatide to a known impurity abundance. The method displayed good specificity, sensitivity, linearity, accuracy, repeatability, intermediate precision, and robustness. The lower limits of quantification were 0.02 % or 0.03 % of teriparatide, below the regulatory reporting threshold of 0.10 %. It was found that quantification using three isotopic peaks per peptide did not provide a significant benefit over quantification with one isotopic peak. The method was validated successfully without the impractical inclusion of an isotopically-labeled internal standard for each impurity. Future studies will be conducted to determine the method's longer-term reproducibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
588
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: This journal is an international medium directed towards the needs of academic, clinical, government and industrial analysis by publishing original research reports and critical reviews on pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. It covers the interdisciplinary aspects of analysis in the pharmaceutical, biomedical and clinical sciences, including developments in analytical methodology, instrumentation, computation and interpretation. Submissions on novel applications focusing on drug purity and stability studies, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic monitoring, metabolic profiling; drug-related aspects of analytical biochemistry and forensic toxicology; quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry are also welcome. Studies from areas of well established and poorly selective methods, such as UV-VIS spectrophotometry (including derivative and multi-wavelength measurements), basic electroanalytical (potentiometric, polarographic and voltammetric) methods, fluorimetry, flow-injection analysis, etc. are accepted for publication in exceptional cases only, if a unique and substantial advantage over presently known systems is demonstrated. The same applies to the assay of simple drug formulations by any kind of methods and the determination of drugs in biological samples based merely on spiked samples. Drug purity/stability studies should contain information on the structure elucidation of the impurities/degradants.
期刊最新文献
Identification and pharmacological properties of 2-(1H-indazole-3-carboxamido)-3,3-dimethylbutanoate (MDMB-INACA), N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (ADB-INACA), and N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-oxobutan-2-yl)-1-hexyl-1H-indazole-3-carboxamide (ADB-HINACA). Three sample preparation methods for clinical determination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy in breast cancer patient plasma using LC-MS: Cross-validation (red), ecological (green) and economical (blue) assessment. Application of a dual channel MPTS-modified two-dimensional cell membrane chromatography system for rapid screening of effective ingredients in Saposhnikovia divaricata targeting inflammatory macrophages and fibroblast synovial cells in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Application of bifunctional monomer surface MIP with MOFs nanocomposite for efficient trapping and analysis of luteolin in compound Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. oral liquid. Development of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of 11 perfluoroalkyl compounds in mouse plasma for toxicokinetic applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1