{"title":"探索近海粒子运动声景。","authors":"Ian T Jones, S B Martin, J L Miksis-Olds","doi":"10.1121/10.0034748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fishes and aquatic invertebrates utilize acoustic particle motion for hearing, and some additionally detect sound pressure. Yet, few underwater soundscapes studies report particle motion, which is often assumed to scale predictably with pressure in offshore habitats. This relationship does not always exist for low frequencies or near reflective boundaries. This study compared particle motion and sound pressure from hydrophone arrays near the seafloor at six sites on the U.S. Mid and South Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf and assessed predictability of sound pressure and particle motion levels by environmental indicators (wind, vessels, temperature, currents). Unidentified fish sounds (100-750 Hz) had particle motion magnitudes 4.8-12.6 dB greater than those predicted from single hydrophone (pressure) measurements, indicating that these sounds were received in the near field. Excess particle motion attributed to hydrodynamic flow noise (<100 Hz) was also present at all sites. Most sounds (25th-75th percentile) from other sources received in the far field (vessels, mammals), had measured particle motion within ±3 dB of that predicted from single hydrophone measurements. The results emphasize for offshore soundscapes the importance of particle motion measurement for short-time (1 min) and near field signals, and that pressure measurement is sufficient for long-term (1 year) predictive modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"157 1","pages":"149-168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring offshore particle motion soundscapes.\",\"authors\":\"Ian T Jones, S B Martin, J L Miksis-Olds\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/10.0034748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fishes and aquatic invertebrates utilize acoustic particle motion for hearing, and some additionally detect sound pressure. Yet, few underwater soundscapes studies report particle motion, which is often assumed to scale predictably with pressure in offshore habitats. This relationship does not always exist for low frequencies or near reflective boundaries. This study compared particle motion and sound pressure from hydrophone arrays near the seafloor at six sites on the U.S. Mid and South Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf and assessed predictability of sound pressure and particle motion levels by environmental indicators (wind, vessels, temperature, currents). Unidentified fish sounds (100-750 Hz) had particle motion magnitudes 4.8-12.6 dB greater than those predicted from single hydrophone (pressure) measurements, indicating that these sounds were received in the near field. Excess particle motion attributed to hydrodynamic flow noise (<100 Hz) was also present at all sites. Most sounds (25th-75th percentile) from other sources received in the far field (vessels, mammals), had measured particle motion within ±3 dB of that predicted from single hydrophone measurements. The results emphasize for offshore soundscapes the importance of particle motion measurement for short-time (1 min) and near field signals, and that pressure measurement is sufficient for long-term (1 year) predictive modeling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"149-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034748\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034748","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fishes and aquatic invertebrates utilize acoustic particle motion for hearing, and some additionally detect sound pressure. Yet, few underwater soundscapes studies report particle motion, which is often assumed to scale predictably with pressure in offshore habitats. This relationship does not always exist for low frequencies or near reflective boundaries. This study compared particle motion and sound pressure from hydrophone arrays near the seafloor at six sites on the U.S. Mid and South Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf and assessed predictability of sound pressure and particle motion levels by environmental indicators (wind, vessels, temperature, currents). Unidentified fish sounds (100-750 Hz) had particle motion magnitudes 4.8-12.6 dB greater than those predicted from single hydrophone (pressure) measurements, indicating that these sounds were received in the near field. Excess particle motion attributed to hydrodynamic flow noise (<100 Hz) was also present at all sites. Most sounds (25th-75th percentile) from other sources received in the far field (vessels, mammals), had measured particle motion within ±3 dB of that predicted from single hydrophone measurements. The results emphasize for offshore soundscapes the importance of particle motion measurement for short-time (1 min) and near field signals, and that pressure measurement is sufficient for long-term (1 year) predictive modeling.
期刊介绍:
Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.