荣誉文化和堕胎的耻辱。

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2024.2449005
Stephen Foster, Jarrod E Bock, Pelin Gul
{"title":"荣誉文化和堕胎的耻辱。","authors":"Stephen Foster, Jarrod E Bock, Pelin Gul","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2024.2449005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to safe abortion is critical for women's health, but women are stigmatised for seeking out an abortion due to social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality. This abortion stigma is likely more prevalent in U.S. cultures of honour (primarily southern and western states), where women's reputation for sexual purity is paramount to their status. To test this possibility, we examined the relationship between honour and abortion-related outcomes at both the state and individual levels. At the state-level, we found that abortion rates were lower in honour (v. dignity) states after controlling for covariates. At the individual-level, we found that endorsement of feminine honour norms was associated with abortion stigma (Study 2) and indirectly linked with support for abortion concealment through anticipated stigma and shame (Study 3). Lastly, using a series of vignettes describing different scenarios in which a woman received an abortion (e.g. rape, relationship difficulties), we found that feminine honour endorsement was associated with decreased support for abortions and stigmatising attitudes toward the woman receiving an abortion (Study 4). Findings elucidate the relationship between honour norms and social stigma around abortion and enhance insights into how cultural processes may influence women's decision making and access to care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culture of honour and the stigma of abortion.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Foster, Jarrod E Bock, Pelin Gul\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08870446.2024.2449005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Access to safe abortion is critical for women's health, but women are stigmatised for seeking out an abortion due to social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality. This abortion stigma is likely more prevalent in U.S. cultures of honour (primarily southern and western states), where women's reputation for sexual purity is paramount to their status. To test this possibility, we examined the relationship between honour and abortion-related outcomes at both the state and individual levels. At the state-level, we found that abortion rates were lower in honour (v. dignity) states after controlling for covariates. At the individual-level, we found that endorsement of feminine honour norms was associated with abortion stigma (Study 2) and indirectly linked with support for abortion concealment through anticipated stigma and shame (Study 3). Lastly, using a series of vignettes describing different scenarios in which a woman received an abortion (e.g. rape, relationship difficulties), we found that feminine honour endorsement was associated with decreased support for abortions and stigmatising attitudes toward the woman receiving an abortion (Study 4). Findings elucidate the relationship between honour norms and social stigma around abortion and enhance insights into how cultural processes may influence women's decision making and access to care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2449005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2449005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

获得安全堕胎对妇女健康至关重要,但由于有关性别角色和性行为的社会规范,妇女因寻求堕胎而受到侮辱。在美国的荣誉文化中(主要是南部和西部各州),这种堕胎的耻辱可能更为普遍,在那里,女性在性纯洁方面的声誉对她们的地位至关重要。为了测试这种可能性,我们在国家和个人层面上研究了荣誉和堕胎相关结果之间的关系。在州一级,我们发现在控制协变量后,荣誉州(vs .尊严州)的堕胎率较低。在个人层面上,我们发现对女性荣誉规范的认可与堕胎耻辱相关(研究2),并通过预期的耻辱和羞耻间接与支持堕胎隐瞒相关(研究3)。最后,使用一系列描述女性接受堕胎的不同场景的小插曲(例如强奸,关系困难),我们发现,女性荣誉背书与对堕胎的支持减少和对接受堕胎的妇女的污名化态度有关(研究4)。研究结果阐明了围绕堕胎的荣誉规范和社会污名之间的关系,并加深了对文化进程如何影响妇女决策和获得护理的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Culture of honour and the stigma of abortion.

Access to safe abortion is critical for women's health, but women are stigmatised for seeking out an abortion due to social norms regarding gender roles and sexuality. This abortion stigma is likely more prevalent in U.S. cultures of honour (primarily southern and western states), where women's reputation for sexual purity is paramount to their status. To test this possibility, we examined the relationship between honour and abortion-related outcomes at both the state and individual levels. At the state-level, we found that abortion rates were lower in honour (v. dignity) states after controlling for covariates. At the individual-level, we found that endorsement of feminine honour norms was associated with abortion stigma (Study 2) and indirectly linked with support for abortion concealment through anticipated stigma and shame (Study 3). Lastly, using a series of vignettes describing different scenarios in which a woman received an abortion (e.g. rape, relationship difficulties), we found that feminine honour endorsement was associated with decreased support for abortions and stigmatising attitudes toward the woman receiving an abortion (Study 4). Findings elucidate the relationship between honour norms and social stigma around abortion and enhance insights into how cultural processes may influence women's decision making and access to care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
Being the supporter: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the role of caregivers in the self-management of type 2 diabetes. Development and validation of a short form psychometric tool assessing the caregiving Challenge of Living with Cystic Fibrosis (CLCF-SF) in a child. An exploration of successful psychosocial adjustment to long-term in-centre haemodialysis. Physical activity planning interventions, body fat and energy-dense food intake in dyads: ripple, spillover, or compensatory effects? How are relying on religion and on science to make sense of the world associated with health-related resources and behaviors and well-being?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1