Liliane Patrícia de Souza Mendes , Verônica Franco Parreira , Bianca Carmona Rocha , Lissa M. Spencer , Marcelo Velloso , Jennifer A. Alison
{"title":"glitre - adl测试在三圈作为替代五圈测试。","authors":"Liliane Patrícia de Souza Mendes , Verônica Franco Parreira , Bianca Carmona Rocha , Lissa M. Spencer , Marcelo Velloso , Jennifer A. Alison","doi":"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Glittre-ADL test is a comprehensive test to evaluate functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The primary aim was to validate the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack performed in three laps as an alternative to five laps in people with COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-eight participants with mild to severe COPD (mean ± SD age: 71 ± 7 years; FEV<sub>1</sub>: 46 ± 17 %predicted) were recruited and performed two 6-min walk tests (visit 1); two Glittre-ADL tests with backpack (visit 2), and the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack, in random order (visit 3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Glittre-ADL tests were performed in five laps and symptoms, heart rate and oxygen saturation were recorded for three and five laps. The Glittre-ADL test performed in three laps provoked the same oxygen desaturation [mean ± SD oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>): 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 6, p = 0.249] and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) [RPE legs: 2.91 ± 2.23 vs 3.08 ± 2.56, p = 0.380; RPE arms: 1.91 ± 1.77 vs 2.16 ± 1.92, p = 0.306] to the Glittre-ADL test performed in five laps for both Glittre with the backpack and without the backpack SpO<sub>2</sub> [mean ± SD: 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 7, p = 0.249], and RPE [legs: 3.02 ± 2.28 vs 3.25 ± 2.37, p = 0.380; arms: 2.13 ± 1.91 vs 2.03 ± 1.84, p = 0.306]. The heart rate and dyspnoea were significantly lower for both Glittre-ADL tests performed in three laps.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The 3-lap Glittre-ADL test may be a more practical alternative to the 5-lap test, while still remaining a good test of functional capacity for activities of daily living.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21057,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory medicine","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glittre-ADL tests in three laps as an alternative to the five laps test\",\"authors\":\"Liliane Patrícia de Souza Mendes , Verônica Franco Parreira , Bianca Carmona Rocha , Lissa M. Spencer , Marcelo Velloso , Jennifer A. Alison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Glittre-ADL test is a comprehensive test to evaluate functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The primary aim was to validate the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack performed in three laps as an alternative to five laps in people with COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-eight participants with mild to severe COPD (mean ± SD age: 71 ± 7 years; FEV<sub>1</sub>: 46 ± 17 %predicted) were recruited and performed two 6-min walk tests (visit 1); two Glittre-ADL tests with backpack (visit 2), and the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack, in random order (visit 3).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Glittre-ADL tests were performed in five laps and symptoms, heart rate and oxygen saturation were recorded for three and five laps. The Glittre-ADL test performed in three laps provoked the same oxygen desaturation [mean ± SD oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>): 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 6, p = 0.249] and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) [RPE legs: 2.91 ± 2.23 vs 3.08 ± 2.56, p = 0.380; RPE arms: 1.91 ± 1.77 vs 2.16 ± 1.92, p = 0.306] to the Glittre-ADL test performed in five laps for both Glittre with the backpack and without the backpack SpO<sub>2</sub> [mean ± SD: 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 7, p = 0.249], and RPE [legs: 3.02 ± 2.28 vs 3.25 ± 2.37, p = 0.380; arms: 2.13 ± 1.91 vs 2.03 ± 1.84, p = 0.306]. The heart rate and dyspnoea were significantly lower for both Glittre-ADL tests performed in three laps.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The 3-lap Glittre-ADL test may be a more practical alternative to the 5-lap test, while still remaining a good test of functional capacity for activities of daily living.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125000071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954611125000071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Glittre-ADL试验是一种评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者功能能力的综合试验。目的:主要目的是验证glitre - adl测试是否在COPD患者中进行三圈背包,作为五圈背包的替代方案。方法:48例轻重度COPD患者(平均±SD年龄:71±7岁;FEV1: 46±17%预测)被招募并进行两次6分钟步行测试(访问1);随机顺序进行两次带背包的glitre - adl测试(就诊2)和带背包和不带背包的glitre - adl测试(就诊3)。结果:glitre - adl测试进行了五圈,记录了三圈和五圈的症状、心率和血氧饱和度。三圈进行glitre - adl试验,引起相同的氧饱和度[平均±SD氧饱和度(SpO2): 90±6 vs 90±6,p=0.249]和感知运动率(RPE) [RPE腿:2.91±2.23 vs 3.08±2.56,p= 0.380;RPE手臂:1.91±1.77 vs 2.16±1.92,p=0.306]与Glittre- adl测试(Glittre带背包和不带背包均在5圈内进行),SpO2[平均±SD: 90±6 vs 90±7,p=0.249]和RPE[腿:3.02±2.28 vs 3.25±2.37,p= 0.380;组:2.13±1.91 vs 2.03±1.84,p=0.306]。在三圈内进行的两项glitre - adl测试中,心率和呼吸困难明显降低。结论:3圈glitre - adl试验可能是比5圈试验更实用的替代方法,同时仍能很好地测试日常生活活动的功能能力。
Glittre-ADL tests in three laps as an alternative to the five laps test
Background
The Glittre-ADL test is a comprehensive test to evaluate functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Aim
The primary aim was to validate the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack performed in three laps as an alternative to five laps in people with COPD.
Methods
Forty-eight participants with mild to severe COPD (mean ± SD age: 71 ± 7 years; FEV1: 46 ± 17 %predicted) were recruited and performed two 6-min walk tests (visit 1); two Glittre-ADL tests with backpack (visit 2), and the Glittre-ADL test with and without the backpack, in random order (visit 3).
Results
The Glittre-ADL tests were performed in five laps and symptoms, heart rate and oxygen saturation were recorded for three and five laps. The Glittre-ADL test performed in three laps provoked the same oxygen desaturation [mean ± SD oxygen saturation (SpO2): 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 6, p = 0.249] and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) [RPE legs: 2.91 ± 2.23 vs 3.08 ± 2.56, p = 0.380; RPE arms: 1.91 ± 1.77 vs 2.16 ± 1.92, p = 0.306] to the Glittre-ADL test performed in five laps for both Glittre with the backpack and without the backpack SpO2 [mean ± SD: 90 ± 6 vs 90 ± 7, p = 0.249], and RPE [legs: 3.02 ± 2.28 vs 3.25 ± 2.37, p = 0.380; arms: 2.13 ± 1.91 vs 2.03 ± 1.84, p = 0.306]. The heart rate and dyspnoea were significantly lower for both Glittre-ADL tests performed in three laps.
Conclusion
The 3-lap Glittre-ADL test may be a more practical alternative to the 5-lap test, while still remaining a good test of functional capacity for activities of daily living.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Medicine is an internationally-renowned journal devoted to the rapid publication of clinically-relevant respiratory medicine research. It combines cutting-edge original research with state-of-the-art reviews dealing with all aspects of respiratory diseases and therapeutic interventions. Topics include adult and paediatric medicine, epidemiology, immunology and cell biology, physiology, occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants.
Respiratory Medicine is increasingly the journal of choice for publication of phased trial work, commenting on effectiveness, dosage and methods of action.