非手术癌症治疗引起的唾液腺功能减退和/或口干:预防策略的系统综述。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09113-x
Valeria Mercadante, Derek K Smith, Ragda Abdalla-Aslan, Ana Andabak-Rogulj, Michael T Brennan, Graziella Chagas Jaguar, Haley Clark, Eduardo Fregnani, Luiz Alcino Gueiros, Allan Hovan, Seema Kurup, Alexa M G A Laheij, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Joel J Napeñas, Douglas E Peterson, Sharon Elad, Stephanie Van Leeuwen, Arjan Vissink, Jonn Wu, Deborah P Saunders, Siri Beier Jensen
{"title":"非手术癌症治疗引起的唾液腺功能减退和/或口干:预防策略的系统综述。","authors":"Valeria Mercadante, Derek K Smith, Ragda Abdalla-Aslan, Ana Andabak-Rogulj, Michael T Brennan, Graziella Chagas Jaguar, Haley Clark, Eduardo Fregnani, Luiz Alcino Gueiros, Allan Hovan, Seema Kurup, Alexa M G A Laheij, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Joel J Napeñas, Douglas E Peterson, Sharon Elad, Stephanie Van Leeuwen, Arjan Vissink, Jonn Wu, Deborah P Saunders, Siri Beier Jensen","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09113-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the updated literature for the prevention of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by non-surgical cancer therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that investigated interventions to prevent salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia. Literature search began from the 2010 systematic review publications from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) up to February 2024. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, cancer treatment modality, interventions, outcome measures, methods, results, risk of bias (RoB version 2), and conclusions for each article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 publications addressing preventive interventions were included. Eight RCTs on tissue-sparing radiation modalities were included showing significant lower prevalence of xerostomia, with unclear effect on salivary gland hypofunction. Three RCTs on preventive acupuncture showed reduced prevalence of xerostomia but not of salivary gland hypofunction. Two RCTs on muscarinic agonist stimulation with bethanechol suggested a preventive effect on saliva flow rate and xerostomia in patients undergoing head and neck radiation or radioactive iodine therapy. Two studies on submandibular gland transfer showed higher salivary flow rates compared to pilocarpine and lower prevalence of xerostomia compared to no active intervention. There is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of vitamin E, amifostine, photobiomodulation, and miscellaneous preventive interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review continues to support the potential of tissue-sparing tecniques and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to preserve salivary gland function in patients with head and neck cancer, with limited evidence on other preventive strategies, including acupuncture and bethanecol. Preventive focus should be on optimized and new approaches developed to further reduce radiation dose to the parotid, the submandibular, and minor salivary glands. As these glands are major contributors to moistening of the oral cavity, limiting the radiation dose to the salivary glands through various modalities has demonstrated reduction in prevalence and severity of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia. There remains no evidence on preventive approaches for checkpoint inhibitors and other biologicals due to the lack of RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia induced by non-surgical cancer therapies: prevention strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Mercadante, Derek K Smith, Ragda Abdalla-Aslan, Ana Andabak-Rogulj, Michael T Brennan, Graziella Chagas Jaguar, Haley Clark, Eduardo Fregnani, Luiz Alcino Gueiros, Allan Hovan, Seema Kurup, Alexa M G A Laheij, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Joel J Napeñas, Douglas E Peterson, Sharon Elad, Stephanie Van Leeuwen, Arjan Vissink, Jonn Wu, Deborah P Saunders, Siri Beier Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-09113-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aimed to assess the updated literature for the prevention of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by non-surgical cancer therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that investigated interventions to prevent salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia. Literature search began from the 2010 systematic review publications from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) up to February 2024. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, cancer treatment modality, interventions, outcome measures, methods, results, risk of bias (RoB version 2), and conclusions for each article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 publications addressing preventive interventions were included. Eight RCTs on tissue-sparing radiation modalities were included showing significant lower prevalence of xerostomia, with unclear effect on salivary gland hypofunction. Three RCTs on preventive acupuncture showed reduced prevalence of xerostomia but not of salivary gland hypofunction. Two RCTs on muscarinic agonist stimulation with bethanechol suggested a preventive effect on saliva flow rate and xerostomia in patients undergoing head and neck radiation or radioactive iodine therapy. Two studies on submandibular gland transfer showed higher salivary flow rates compared to pilocarpine and lower prevalence of xerostomia compared to no active intervention. There is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of vitamin E, amifostine, photobiomodulation, and miscellaneous preventive interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review continues to support the potential of tissue-sparing tecniques and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to preserve salivary gland function in patients with head and neck cancer, with limited evidence on other preventive strategies, including acupuncture and bethanecol. Preventive focus should be on optimized and new approaches developed to further reduce radiation dose to the parotid, the submandibular, and minor salivary glands. As these glands are major contributors to moistening of the oral cavity, limiting the radiation dose to the salivary glands through various modalities has demonstrated reduction in prevalence and severity of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia. There remains no evidence on preventive approaches for checkpoint inhibitors and other biologicals due to the lack of RCTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723892/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09113-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09113-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述旨在评估有关预防非手术治疗癌症引起的唾液腺功能减退和口干的最新文献。方法:检索MEDLINE/PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆的电子数据库,检索研究预防唾液腺功能减退和/或口干症干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT)。文献检索从跨国癌症支持护理协会/国际口腔肿瘤学会(MASCC/ISOO)截至2024年2月的2010年系统综述出版物开始。两位独立审稿人为每篇文章提取了有关研究设计、研究人群、癌症治疗方式、干预措施、结局测量、方法、结果、偏倚风险(RoB版本2)和结论的信息。结果:共纳入51篇涉及预防干预措施的出版物。8项关于保留组织的放射方式的随机对照试验显示,口干症的患病率显著降低,但对唾液腺功能减退的影响尚不清楚。三个关于预防性针灸的随机对照试验显示,口干症的患病率降低,但唾液腺功能减退没有。两项随机对照试验显示,对接受头颈部放疗或放射性碘治疗的患者的唾液流率和口干有预防作用。两项关于下颌腺转移的研究表明,与匹罗卡平相比,唾液流率更高,与没有积极干预相比,口干的患病率更低。关于维生素E、氨磷汀、光生物调节和其他预防干预措施的有效性证据不足。结论:本系统综述继续支持组织保留技术和强度调节放射治疗(IMRT)在头颈癌患者中保护唾液腺功能的潜力,其他预防策略的证据有限,包括针灸和bethanecol。预防的重点应放在优化和开发新的方法上,以进一步减少对腮腺、下颌下和小唾液腺的辐射剂量。由于这些腺体是口腔湿润的主要贡献者,通过各种方式限制对唾液腺的辐射剂量已经证明降低了唾液腺功能减退和口干症的患病率和严重程度。由于缺乏随机对照试验,仍然没有证据表明检查点抑制剂和其他生物制剂的预防方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia induced by non-surgical cancer therapies: prevention strategies.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to assess the updated literature for the prevention of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by non-surgical cancer therapies.

Methods: Electronic databases of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that investigated interventions to prevent salivary gland hypofunction and/or xerostomia. Literature search began from the 2010 systematic review publications from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO) up to February 2024. Two independent reviewers extracted information regarding study design, study population, cancer treatment modality, interventions, outcome measures, methods, results, risk of bias (RoB version 2), and conclusions for each article.

Results: A total of 51 publications addressing preventive interventions were included. Eight RCTs on tissue-sparing radiation modalities were included showing significant lower prevalence of xerostomia, with unclear effect on salivary gland hypofunction. Three RCTs on preventive acupuncture showed reduced prevalence of xerostomia but not of salivary gland hypofunction. Two RCTs on muscarinic agonist stimulation with bethanechol suggested a preventive effect on saliva flow rate and xerostomia in patients undergoing head and neck radiation or radioactive iodine therapy. Two studies on submandibular gland transfer showed higher salivary flow rates compared to pilocarpine and lower prevalence of xerostomia compared to no active intervention. There is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of vitamin E, amifostine, photobiomodulation, and miscellaneous preventive interventions.

Conclusion: This systematic review continues to support the potential of tissue-sparing tecniques and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to preserve salivary gland function in patients with head and neck cancer, with limited evidence on other preventive strategies, including acupuncture and bethanecol. Preventive focus should be on optimized and new approaches developed to further reduce radiation dose to the parotid, the submandibular, and minor salivary glands. As these glands are major contributors to moistening of the oral cavity, limiting the radiation dose to the salivary glands through various modalities has demonstrated reduction in prevalence and severity of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia. There remains no evidence on preventive approaches for checkpoint inhibitors and other biologicals due to the lack of RCTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review. The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of early breast cancer: A scoping review of risk factors and outcomes. Sleep quality in lung cancer and specifically non-small-cell lung cancer: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1