为运动肿瘤服务付费的意愿:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09105-x
Prue Cormie, Ashleigh Bradford, Christopher M Doran, Boyd A Potts, Peter Martin, Meg Chiswell, Mei Krishnasamy
{"title":"为运动肿瘤服务付费的意愿:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Prue Cormie, Ashleigh Bradford, Christopher M Doran, Boyd A Potts, Peter Martin, Meg Chiswell, Mei Krishnasamy","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09105-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate cancer patients' willingness to pay for exercise services and oncology health professionals' perception of patients' willingness to pay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to people with any type of cancer and oncology health professionals delivering clinical care. Questionnaires assessed patients' willingness to pay for one consultation with a cancer-trained exercise specialist (i.e. exercise physiologist/physiotherapist) and regular group exercise sessions supervised by cancer-trained exercise specialists. Interviews probed factors associated with the out-of-pocket cost of adopting exercise guidelines. Data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics and an interpretive descriptive approach to qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 450 cancer patients and 300 oncology health professionals. A randomly selected sub-set of 30 patients and 31 health professionals completed interviews. The majority of patients surveyed would pay for an exercise consultation (94%) and regular group exercise sessions (58.4% extremely likely; 24.7% moderately likely; standard 7-point Likert scale response options). A greater proportion of patients who were employed (97.2% p = 0.030), below average general health (97.0% p = 0.031), were female (96.1% p = 0.013), and insufficiently active (95.3% p = 0.048) were willing to pay for exercise services. Oncology health professionals perceived fewer patients would be willing to pay for exercise services (p < 0.001; consultation = 7.0% extremely likely, 32.7% moderately likely; regular supervised sessions = 5.3% extremely likely; 32.0% moderately likely).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When briefly informed of the benefits and costs of exercise, the majority of patients in this study would pay for cancer-specific exercise services. There is an opportunity to align perceptions of willingness to pay among patients and health professionals involved in their care to help facilitate the uptake of exercise guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness to pay for exercise oncology services: a mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Prue Cormie, Ashleigh Bradford, Christopher M Doran, Boyd A Potts, Peter Martin, Meg Chiswell, Mei Krishnasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-024-09105-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate cancer patients' willingness to pay for exercise services and oncology health professionals' perception of patients' willingness to pay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was used. Online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to people with any type of cancer and oncology health professionals delivering clinical care. Questionnaires assessed patients' willingness to pay for one consultation with a cancer-trained exercise specialist (i.e. exercise physiologist/physiotherapist) and regular group exercise sessions supervised by cancer-trained exercise specialists. Interviews probed factors associated with the out-of-pocket cost of adopting exercise guidelines. Data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics and an interpretive descriptive approach to qualitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 450 cancer patients and 300 oncology health professionals. A randomly selected sub-set of 30 patients and 31 health professionals completed interviews. The majority of patients surveyed would pay for an exercise consultation (94%) and regular group exercise sessions (58.4% extremely likely; 24.7% moderately likely; standard 7-point Likert scale response options). A greater proportion of patients who were employed (97.2% p = 0.030), below average general health (97.0% p = 0.031), were female (96.1% p = 0.013), and insufficiently active (95.3% p = 0.048) were willing to pay for exercise services. Oncology health professionals perceived fewer patients would be willing to pay for exercise services (p < 0.001; consultation = 7.0% extremely likely, 32.7% moderately likely; regular supervised sessions = 5.3% extremely likely; 32.0% moderately likely).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When briefly informed of the benefits and costs of exercise, the majority of patients in this study would pay for cancer-specific exercise services. There is an opportunity to align perceptions of willingness to pay among patients and health professionals involved in their care to help facilitate the uptake of exercise guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09105-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09105-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价肿瘤患者对运动服务的付费意愿及肿瘤卫生专业人员对患者付费意愿的认知。方法:采用混合方法设计。对任何类型的癌症患者和提供临床护理的肿瘤卫生专业人员进行了在线问卷调查和半结构化访谈。调查问卷评估患者是否愿意向接受过癌症训练的运动专家(即运动生理学家/物理治疗师)咨询一次,并在接受过癌症训练的运动专家的监督下定期进行小组运动。访谈探讨了与采用运动指南的自付费用相关的因素。数据分析使用标准描述性统计和定性分析的解释性描述性方法。结果:参与者包括450名癌症患者和300名肿瘤卫生专业人员。随机选择30名患者和31名卫生专业人员完成访谈。大多数接受调查的患者会支付锻炼咨询(94%)和定期团体锻炼(58.4%极有可能;24.7%中等可能;标准7分李克特量表反应选项)。就业(97.2% p = 0.030)、总体健康状况低于平均水平(97.0% p = 0.031)的患者中,女性(96.1% p = 0.013)和运动不足(95.3% p = 0.048)的患者中,愿意为运动服务付费的比例更高。肿瘤健康专业人员认为,很少有患者愿意为运动服务付费(p结论:当简要告知运动的收益和成本时,本研究中的大多数患者会为癌症特定的运动服务付费。有机会协调患者和参与其护理的卫生专业人员对支付意愿的看法,以帮助促进对运动指南的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Willingness to pay for exercise oncology services: a mixed methods study.

Purpose: To evaluate cancer patients' willingness to pay for exercise services and oncology health professionals' perception of patients' willingness to pay.

Methods: A mixed-methods design was used. Online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were administered to people with any type of cancer and oncology health professionals delivering clinical care. Questionnaires assessed patients' willingness to pay for one consultation with a cancer-trained exercise specialist (i.e. exercise physiologist/physiotherapist) and regular group exercise sessions supervised by cancer-trained exercise specialists. Interviews probed factors associated with the out-of-pocket cost of adopting exercise guidelines. Data were analysed using standard descriptive statistics and an interpretive descriptive approach to qualitative analysis.

Results: Participants included 450 cancer patients and 300 oncology health professionals. A randomly selected sub-set of 30 patients and 31 health professionals completed interviews. The majority of patients surveyed would pay for an exercise consultation (94%) and regular group exercise sessions (58.4% extremely likely; 24.7% moderately likely; standard 7-point Likert scale response options). A greater proportion of patients who were employed (97.2% p = 0.030), below average general health (97.0% p = 0.031), were female (96.1% p = 0.013), and insufficiently active (95.3% p = 0.048) were willing to pay for exercise services. Oncology health professionals perceived fewer patients would be willing to pay for exercise services (p < 0.001; consultation = 7.0% extremely likely, 32.7% moderately likely; regular supervised sessions = 5.3% extremely likely; 32.0% moderately likely).

Conclusions: When briefly informed of the benefits and costs of exercise, the majority of patients in this study would pay for cancer-specific exercise services. There is an opportunity to align perceptions of willingness to pay among patients and health professionals involved in their care to help facilitate the uptake of exercise guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review. The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of early breast cancer: A scoping review of risk factors and outcomes. Sleep quality in lung cancer and specifically non-small-cell lung cancer: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1