Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Soo Wung Shin, Sun Ho Lee, Su Min Seo, Seung Hong Koh, Seung-Ah Ryu, Ki-Hong Kim, Jeong Hwan Ko, Chang Hyun Doh, Young Rak Choi, Namkug Kim
{"title":"利用基于深度学习的负重侧足x线片分割增强平足和足弓足的诊断:一项比较观察研究。","authors":"Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Soo Wung Shin, Sun Ho Lee, Su Min Seo, Seung Hong Koh, Seung-Ah Ryu, Ki-Hong Kim, Jeong Hwan Ko, Chang Hyun Doh, Young Rak Choi, Namkug Kim","doi":"10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A weight-bearing lateral radiograph (WBLR) of the foot is a gold standard for diagnosing adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. However, it is difficult to measure the major axis of bones in WBLR without using auxiliary lines. Herein, we develop semantic segmentation with a deep learning model (DLm) on the WBLR of the foot for enhanced diagnosis of pes planus and pes cavus. We used 300 consecutive WBLRs from young Korean males. The semantic segmentation model was developed based on U<sup>2</sup>-Net. An expert orthopedic surgeon manually labeled ground truths. We used 200 radiographs for training, 100 for internal validation, and two external datasets for external validation. The model was trained using a hybrid loss function, combining Dice Loss and boundary-based loss, to enhance both overall segmentation accuracy and precise delineation of boundary regions between pes planus and pes cavus. Angle measurement errors with minimum moment of inertia (MMI) and ellipsoidal fitting (EF) based on the segmentation results were evaluated. The DLm exhibited better results than human observers. For internal validation, the absolute angle errors of the DLm using MMI and EF were 0.92 ± 1.32° and 1.34 ± 2.07°, respectively. In external validation, these errors were 1.17 ± 1.60° and 1.60 ± 2.42° for AMC's dataset, and 1.23 ± 1.39° and 1.68 ± 1.98° for the LERA dataset, respectively. The DLm showed higher overall diagnostic accuracy than human observers in identifying flatfoot angles, regardless of the measurement methods. The absolute angle errors and diagnostic accuracy of the developed DLm are superior to those of the three human observers. Furthermore, when comparing the angle measurement methods within the DLm, the MMI method proves to be more accurate than EF. Finally, the proposed deep learning model, particularly with the implementation of the U<sup>2</sup>-Net demonstrates enhanced boundary segmentation and achieves sufficient external validation results, affirming its applicability in the real clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 1","pages":"203-215"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced diagnosis of pes planus and pes cavus using deep learning-based segmentation of weight-bearing lateral foot radiographs: a comparative observer study.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Min Ryu, Keewon Shin, Soo Wung Shin, Sun Ho Lee, Su Min Seo, Seung Hong Koh, Seung-Ah Ryu, Ki-Hong Kim, Jeong Hwan Ko, Chang Hyun Doh, Young Rak Choi, Namkug Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A weight-bearing lateral radiograph (WBLR) of the foot is a gold standard for diagnosing adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. However, it is difficult to measure the major axis of bones in WBLR without using auxiliary lines. Herein, we develop semantic segmentation with a deep learning model (DLm) on the WBLR of the foot for enhanced diagnosis of pes planus and pes cavus. We used 300 consecutive WBLRs from young Korean males. The semantic segmentation model was developed based on U<sup>2</sup>-Net. An expert orthopedic surgeon manually labeled ground truths. We used 200 radiographs for training, 100 for internal validation, and two external datasets for external validation. The model was trained using a hybrid loss function, combining Dice Loss and boundary-based loss, to enhance both overall segmentation accuracy and precise delineation of boundary regions between pes planus and pes cavus. Angle measurement errors with minimum moment of inertia (MMI) and ellipsoidal fitting (EF) based on the segmentation results were evaluated. The DLm exhibited better results than human observers. For internal validation, the absolute angle errors of the DLm using MMI and EF were 0.92 ± 1.32° and 1.34 ± 2.07°, respectively. In external validation, these errors were 1.17 ± 1.60° and 1.60 ± 2.42° for AMC's dataset, and 1.23 ± 1.39° and 1.68 ± 1.98° for the LERA dataset, respectively. The DLm showed higher overall diagnostic accuracy than human observers in identifying flatfoot angles, regardless of the measurement methods. The absolute angle errors and diagnostic accuracy of the developed DLm are superior to those of the three human observers. Furthermore, when comparing the angle measurement methods within the DLm, the MMI method proves to be more accurate than EF. Finally, the proposed deep learning model, particularly with the implementation of the U<sup>2</sup>-Net demonstrates enhanced boundary segmentation and achieves sufficient external validation results, affirming its applicability in the real clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"203-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11704119/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhanced diagnosis of pes planus and pes cavus using deep learning-based segmentation of weight-bearing lateral foot radiographs: a comparative observer study.
A weight-bearing lateral radiograph (WBLR) of the foot is a gold standard for diagnosing adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. However, it is difficult to measure the major axis of bones in WBLR without using auxiliary lines. Herein, we develop semantic segmentation with a deep learning model (DLm) on the WBLR of the foot for enhanced diagnosis of pes planus and pes cavus. We used 300 consecutive WBLRs from young Korean males. The semantic segmentation model was developed based on U2-Net. An expert orthopedic surgeon manually labeled ground truths. We used 200 radiographs for training, 100 for internal validation, and two external datasets for external validation. The model was trained using a hybrid loss function, combining Dice Loss and boundary-based loss, to enhance both overall segmentation accuracy and precise delineation of boundary regions between pes planus and pes cavus. Angle measurement errors with minimum moment of inertia (MMI) and ellipsoidal fitting (EF) based on the segmentation results were evaluated. The DLm exhibited better results than human observers. For internal validation, the absolute angle errors of the DLm using MMI and EF were 0.92 ± 1.32° and 1.34 ± 2.07°, respectively. In external validation, these errors were 1.17 ± 1.60° and 1.60 ± 2.42° for AMC's dataset, and 1.23 ± 1.39° and 1.68 ± 1.98° for the LERA dataset, respectively. The DLm showed higher overall diagnostic accuracy than human observers in identifying flatfoot angles, regardless of the measurement methods. The absolute angle errors and diagnostic accuracy of the developed DLm are superior to those of the three human observers. Furthermore, when comparing the angle measurement methods within the DLm, the MMI method proves to be more accurate than EF. Finally, the proposed deep learning model, particularly with the implementation of the U2-Net demonstrates enhanced boundary segmentation and achieves sufficient external validation results, affirming its applicability in the real clinical setting.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-024-00439-3.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.