{"title":"调查住院病人接受一个独特的远程医疗服务在澳大利亚农村急症病房试验。","authors":"Carol Joy Reid, Catherine Church","doi":"10.1177/23743735241311716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated inpatient acceptance of a unique telemedicine clinical service piloted from December 2022 to June 2025 in 3 rural acute wards in Victoria, Australia. The use of virtual care was complementary to the visiting general practitioner (GP) model common in rural hospitals. The qualitative study employed 3 researcher-designed questions: Did you feel safe using the virtual healthcare doctor?; Did you feel the care you experienced was as it should be? And; If you were offered virtual care again, would you use it? Participants (<i>n</i> = 38) were predominantly over 65 years (95%). Findings describe safe care as being able to understand the virtual doctor, be listened to, and ask questions. Participants affirmed that the care experienced was helpful due to prompt in-hospital clinical interventions organized by the virtual weekend coverage. Most were first-time users of virtual care and recognized that rural doctors need a break. Barriers to acceptance of the service were concerns about the loss of in-person visits with their local doctor and that virtual care could replace local GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241311716"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Inpatient Acceptance of a Unique Telemedicine Service Trialled in the Acute Ward in Rural Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Carol Joy Reid, Catherine Church\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735241311716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated inpatient acceptance of a unique telemedicine clinical service piloted from December 2022 to June 2025 in 3 rural acute wards in Victoria, Australia. The use of virtual care was complementary to the visiting general practitioner (GP) model common in rural hospitals. The qualitative study employed 3 researcher-designed questions: Did you feel safe using the virtual healthcare doctor?; Did you feel the care you experienced was as it should be? And; If you were offered virtual care again, would you use it? Participants (<i>n</i> = 38) were predominantly over 65 years (95%). Findings describe safe care as being able to understand the virtual doctor, be listened to, and ask questions. Participants affirmed that the care experienced was helpful due to prompt in-hospital clinical interventions organized by the virtual weekend coverage. Most were first-time users of virtual care and recognized that rural doctors need a break. Barriers to acceptance of the service were concerns about the loss of in-person visits with their local doctor and that virtual care could replace local GPs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23743735241311716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705345/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241311716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241311716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating Inpatient Acceptance of a Unique Telemedicine Service Trialled in the Acute Ward in Rural Australia.
This study investigated inpatient acceptance of a unique telemedicine clinical service piloted from December 2022 to June 2025 in 3 rural acute wards in Victoria, Australia. The use of virtual care was complementary to the visiting general practitioner (GP) model common in rural hospitals. The qualitative study employed 3 researcher-designed questions: Did you feel safe using the virtual healthcare doctor?; Did you feel the care you experienced was as it should be? And; If you were offered virtual care again, would you use it? Participants (n = 38) were predominantly over 65 years (95%). Findings describe safe care as being able to understand the virtual doctor, be listened to, and ask questions. Participants affirmed that the care experienced was helpful due to prompt in-hospital clinical interventions organized by the virtual weekend coverage. Most were first-time users of virtual care and recognized that rural doctors need a break. Barriers to acceptance of the service were concerns about the loss of in-person visits with their local doctor and that virtual care could replace local GPs.