使用多种策略是否能增强学龄前儿童在挑战性任务中的持久性?

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106170
Moeko Ishikawa, Yasuhiro Kanakogi
{"title":"使用多种策略是否能增强学龄前儿童在挑战性任务中的持久性?","authors":"Moeko Ishikawa, Yasuhiro Kanakogi","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persistence, characterized by continued efforts in the face of difficulties, is crucial for children's success. Many researchers have aimed to identify the factors that improve persistence. Previous research has found that children who use more strategies to solve a challenging task tend to exhibit greater persistence, suggesting that providing instructions for multiple strategies may enhance their persistence. Therefore, this study examined whether telling strategies through verbal instructions and demonstrations affected persistence in 4- and 5-year-old children using an unachievable persistence task. In preregistered Study 1 (N = 150), we instructed children to focus on multiple strategies or a single strategy in a direct or pedagogical manner during the task. No substantial effects of telling strategies through verbal instructions were found on the children's persistence and strategy use. In Study 2 (N = 54), demonstrating strategies did not affect children's persistence; however, demonstrating multiple and single strategies increased and decreased children's number of strategies, respectively. Thus, telling strategies through demonstrations, rather than verbal instructions, affected the number of strategies used by the children; however, the number of strategies used did not affect persistence. An exploratory analysis was conducted to examine why the number of strategies was not related to persistence. We found that independently devising new strategies, rather than following instructions, affected persistence. Furthermore, this relationship was replicated in Study 3 (N = 30). Our findings suggest that children are likely to persevere in challenging tasks by independently devising new strategies rather than following instructions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"252 ","pages":"106170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does using multiple strategies enhance preschoolers' persistence in a challenging task?\",\"authors\":\"Moeko Ishikawa, Yasuhiro Kanakogi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Persistence, characterized by continued efforts in the face of difficulties, is crucial for children's success. Many researchers have aimed to identify the factors that improve persistence. Previous research has found that children who use more strategies to solve a challenging task tend to exhibit greater persistence, suggesting that providing instructions for multiple strategies may enhance their persistence. Therefore, this study examined whether telling strategies through verbal instructions and demonstrations affected persistence in 4- and 5-year-old children using an unachievable persistence task. In preregistered Study 1 (N = 150), we instructed children to focus on multiple strategies or a single strategy in a direct or pedagogical manner during the task. No substantial effects of telling strategies through verbal instructions were found on the children's persistence and strategy use. In Study 2 (N = 54), demonstrating strategies did not affect children's persistence; however, demonstrating multiple and single strategies increased and decreased children's number of strategies, respectively. Thus, telling strategies through demonstrations, rather than verbal instructions, affected the number of strategies used by the children; however, the number of strategies used did not affect persistence. An exploratory analysis was conducted to examine why the number of strategies was not related to persistence. We found that independently devising new strategies, rather than following instructions, affected persistence. Furthermore, this relationship was replicated in Study 3 (N = 30). Our findings suggest that children are likely to persevere in challenging tasks by independently devising new strategies rather than following instructions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"volume\":\"252 \",\"pages\":\"106170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106170\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106170","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毅力,即在困难面前继续努力,是孩子成功的关键。许多研究人员致力于找出提高毅力的因素。先前的研究发现,使用更多策略来解决具有挑战性的任务的孩子往往表现出更强的毅力,这表明为多种策略提供指导可能会增强他们的毅力。因此,本研究考察了通过口头指示和示范来讲述策略是否会影响4岁和5岁儿童在执行一项无法完成的持久性任务时的持久性。在预注册的研究1 (N = 150)中,我们指导儿童在任务过程中以直接或教学的方式关注多种策略或单一策略。通过口头指示的讲述策略对儿童的坚持和策略使用没有实质性的影响。在研究2 (N = 54)中,展示策略不影响儿童的坚持;然而,展示多种策略和单一策略分别增加和减少了儿童的策略数量。因此,通过示范而不是口头指示来讲述策略会影响儿童使用策略的数量;然而,使用策略的数量并不影响持久性。我们进行了一项探索性分析,以检验为什么策略的数量与持久性无关。我们发现,独立设计新策略,而不是听从指示,会影响持久性。此外,这种关系在研究3中得到了重复(N = 30)。我们的研究结果表明,孩子们可能会通过独立设计新策略而不是遵循指示来坚持具有挑战性的任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does using multiple strategies enhance preschoolers' persistence in a challenging task?

Persistence, characterized by continued efforts in the face of difficulties, is crucial for children's success. Many researchers have aimed to identify the factors that improve persistence. Previous research has found that children who use more strategies to solve a challenging task tend to exhibit greater persistence, suggesting that providing instructions for multiple strategies may enhance their persistence. Therefore, this study examined whether telling strategies through verbal instructions and demonstrations affected persistence in 4- and 5-year-old children using an unachievable persistence task. In preregistered Study 1 (N = 150), we instructed children to focus on multiple strategies or a single strategy in a direct or pedagogical manner during the task. No substantial effects of telling strategies through verbal instructions were found on the children's persistence and strategy use. In Study 2 (N = 54), demonstrating strategies did not affect children's persistence; however, demonstrating multiple and single strategies increased and decreased children's number of strategies, respectively. Thus, telling strategies through demonstrations, rather than verbal instructions, affected the number of strategies used by the children; however, the number of strategies used did not affect persistence. An exploratory analysis was conducted to examine why the number of strategies was not related to persistence. We found that independently devising new strategies, rather than following instructions, affected persistence. Furthermore, this relationship was replicated in Study 3 (N = 30). Our findings suggest that children are likely to persevere in challenging tasks by independently devising new strategies rather than following instructions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
The relation of verbal and nonverbal skills to basic numerical processing of preterm versus term-born preschoolers. Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice. Contingency in maternal sensitivity and quality of child attachment. Affordances of fractions and decimals for arithmetic among middle school students in the United States and China. Emotional elements matter: Stories about a protagonist's guilt over lying promote honesty in early elementary school children but not in preschool children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1