评估护理人员负担:辅助器具的作用和辅助器具需求的识别。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2025.2449998
Yeji Hwang, Eunmi Oh, SeolHwa Moon, Daum Chung, Rina Choi, Gwi-Ryung Son Hong
{"title":"评估护理人员负担:辅助器具的作用和辅助器具需求的识别。","authors":"Yeji Hwang, Eunmi Oh, SeolHwa Moon, Daum Chung, Rina Choi, Gwi-Ryung Son Hong","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2449998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is insufficient information on whether the use of assistive devices is associated with a lower burden on caregivers of individuals with disabilities. This study was conducted (1) to examine how care recipient-level factors, caregiver-level factors, and the use of assistive devices were associated with caregiver burden, and (2) to investigate the assistive device needs of caregivers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional descriptive study used surveys. The participants were caregivers of people with disabilities living in Korea (<i>n</i> = 499). The independent variables were care recipient-level factors, caregiver-level factors, and utilization of assistive devices. The outcome variable, caregiver burden, was measured using the Korean Caregiver Burden Scale. For the data analysis, multivariate logistic regression models were built on the caregiver burden using variables that showed statistical significance in the univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model 1 included care recipient-level factors. Model 2 included caregiver-level factors in addition to care-recipient factors to examine caregiver factors associated with burden. Model 3 included the utilization of care devices, in addition to the variables used in Model 2, to investigate whether the use of care devices was associated with a lower burden. Caregivers who were married, were informal caregivers, or experienced greater psychological stress had an increased probability of experiencing caregiver burden. Moreover, not using assistive devices increases the odds of experiencing caregiver burden. The most desirable properties of devices are transfer, mobility, and bathing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the use of assistive devices is associated with caregiver burden, such care devices should be developed and provided to caregivers based on their individual needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing caregiver burden: the role of assistive devices and identification of assistive device needs.\",\"authors\":\"Yeji Hwang, Eunmi Oh, SeolHwa Moon, Daum Chung, Rina Choi, Gwi-Ryung Son Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2449998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is insufficient information on whether the use of assistive devices is associated with a lower burden on caregivers of individuals with disabilities. This study was conducted (1) to examine how care recipient-level factors, caregiver-level factors, and the use of assistive devices were associated with caregiver burden, and (2) to investigate the assistive device needs of caregivers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional descriptive study used surveys. The participants were caregivers of people with disabilities living in Korea (<i>n</i> = 499). The independent variables were care recipient-level factors, caregiver-level factors, and utilization of assistive devices. The outcome variable, caregiver burden, was measured using the Korean Caregiver Burden Scale. For the data analysis, multivariate logistic regression models were built on the caregiver burden using variables that showed statistical significance in the univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model 1 included care recipient-level factors. Model 2 included caregiver-level factors in addition to care-recipient factors to examine caregiver factors associated with burden. Model 3 included the utilization of care devices, in addition to the variables used in Model 2, to investigate whether the use of care devices was associated with a lower burden. Caregivers who were married, were informal caregivers, or experienced greater psychological stress had an increased probability of experiencing caregiver burden. Moreover, not using assistive devices increases the odds of experiencing caregiver burden. The most desirable properties of devices are transfer, mobility, and bathing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As the use of assistive devices is associated with caregiver burden, such care devices should be developed and provided to caregivers based on their individual needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2449998\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2449998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于辅助器具的使用是否与减轻残疾人照顾者负担相关的信息不足。本研究旨在(1)探讨受照护者水平因素、照护者水平因素和辅助器具使用与照护者负担的关系;(2)调查照护者对辅助器具的需求。材料和方法:本研究采用横断面描述性调查。参与者是居住在韩国的残疾人的照顾者(n = 499)。自变量为受照护者水平因素、照护者水平因素和辅助器具的使用。结果变量,照顾者负担,使用韩国照顾者负担量表进行测量。对于数据分析,采用单变量分析中具有统计学意义的变量,对照顾者负担建立多变量logistic回归模型。结果:模型1包含受照顾者水平因素。模型2在纳入照顾者水平因素的基础上,加入照顾者-受照顾者因素,考察照顾者因素与负担的关系。模型3除了模型2中使用的变量外,还加入了医疗器械的使用情况,以考察医疗器械的使用是否与较低的负担相关。已婚、非正式照顾者或经历过更大心理压力的照顾者更有可能经历照顾者负担。此外,不使用辅助装置增加了经历照顾者负担的可能性。设备最理想的特性是转移、移动和沐浴。结论:辅助器具的使用与护理人员负担相关,应根据护理人员的个性化需求开发并提供辅助器具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing caregiver burden: the role of assistive devices and identification of assistive device needs.

Purpose: There is insufficient information on whether the use of assistive devices is associated with a lower burden on caregivers of individuals with disabilities. This study was conducted (1) to examine how care recipient-level factors, caregiver-level factors, and the use of assistive devices were associated with caregiver burden, and (2) to investigate the assistive device needs of caregivers.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study used surveys. The participants were caregivers of people with disabilities living in Korea (n = 499). The independent variables were care recipient-level factors, caregiver-level factors, and utilization of assistive devices. The outcome variable, caregiver burden, was measured using the Korean Caregiver Burden Scale. For the data analysis, multivariate logistic regression models were built on the caregiver burden using variables that showed statistical significance in the univariate analysis.

Results: Model 1 included care recipient-level factors. Model 2 included caregiver-level factors in addition to care-recipient factors to examine caregiver factors associated with burden. Model 3 included the utilization of care devices, in addition to the variables used in Model 2, to investigate whether the use of care devices was associated with a lower burden. Caregivers who were married, were informal caregivers, or experienced greater psychological stress had an increased probability of experiencing caregiver burden. Moreover, not using assistive devices increases the odds of experiencing caregiver burden. The most desirable properties of devices are transfer, mobility, and bathing.

Conclusion: As the use of assistive devices is associated with caregiver burden, such care devices should be developed and provided to caregivers based on their individual needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Evidence to inform seat height and seat angle configuration for bilateral foot propulsion. Inclusive waste separation: co-designed bins empowering visually impaired individuals. Characteristics of factors affecting axle load and friction forces in a wheelchair. Tools and devices for telerehabilitation in pediatric and adult cystic fibrosis patients: a scoping review. Design priorities for an at-home upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1