{"title":"少数族裔压力与性少数和性别少数人群的生物学结果的关系:系统回顾和更新。","authors":"Annesa Flentje, Gowri Sunder, Elliot Tebbe","doi":"10.1007/s10865-024-00539-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Here we present an updated systematic review identifying studies published 2019-2024, since our prior systematic review in 2020, that examine the association between minority stress and a biological outcome among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people. Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase were queried to identify studies that examined an association between minority stress (including prejudice events and conditions, anticipation of rejection and discrimination, concealment or disclosure of SGM identity(ies), internalized stigma, or structural stigma) and a biological health outcome among SGM people. Included studies were coded for methodological approaches, study population, minority stress measure, biological outcomes, count of overall analyses, and count of analyses where an association was detected. Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and included a total of 391 analyses between an element of minority stress and a biological outcome, among which 38% of analyses detected an association (44% detected this association when study outliers were removed). All elements of minority stress demonstrated associations with outcomes: multicomponent measures, prejudice events and conditions, and structural stigma demonstrated the highest proportion of associations. Associations with minority stress were detected for general physical health, sleep, immune, cardiovascular, metabolic, hormonal, brain health, allostatic load, epigenetic and transcriptional regulation. The highest proportion of associations were detected among sleep, immune, cardiovascular, and hormonal outcomes. These studies evidence associations between minority stress and biological outcomes among gender minority people in addition to evidence among sexual minority people. Future research should consider increasing rigor in methodology and expanding our understanding of moderators and mediators of these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minority stress in relation to biological outcomes among sexual and gender minority people: a systematic review and update.\",\"authors\":\"Annesa Flentje, Gowri Sunder, Elliot Tebbe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10865-024-00539-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Here we present an updated systematic review identifying studies published 2019-2024, since our prior systematic review in 2020, that examine the association between minority stress and a biological outcome among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people. Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase were queried to identify studies that examined an association between minority stress (including prejudice events and conditions, anticipation of rejection and discrimination, concealment or disclosure of SGM identity(ies), internalized stigma, or structural stigma) and a biological health outcome among SGM people. Included studies were coded for methodological approaches, study population, minority stress measure, biological outcomes, count of overall analyses, and count of analyses where an association was detected. Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and included a total of 391 analyses between an element of minority stress and a biological outcome, among which 38% of analyses detected an association (44% detected this association when study outliers were removed). All elements of minority stress demonstrated associations with outcomes: multicomponent measures, prejudice events and conditions, and structural stigma demonstrated the highest proportion of associations. Associations with minority stress were detected for general physical health, sleep, immune, cardiovascular, metabolic, hormonal, brain health, allostatic load, epigenetic and transcriptional regulation. The highest proportion of associations were detected among sleep, immune, cardiovascular, and hormonal outcomes. These studies evidence associations between minority stress and biological outcomes among gender minority people in addition to evidence among sexual minority people. Future research should consider increasing rigor in methodology and expanding our understanding of moderators and mediators of these relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00539-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00539-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在此,我们提出了一项更新的系统综述,确定了自2020年系统综述以来发表的2019-2024年的研究,这些研究考察了性和性别少数群体(SGM)人群中少数群体压力与生物学结果之间的关系。我们对Pubmed、Web of Science和Embase进行了查询,以确定研究是否调查了少数族裔压力(包括偏见事件和条件、对拒绝和歧视的预期、隐瞒或披露SGM身份、内化耻辱或结构性耻辱)与SGM人群的生物健康结果之间的关系。纳入的研究按方法学方法、研究人群、少数民族应激测量、生物学结果、总体分析计数和检测到关联的分析计数进行编码。59项研究符合纳入标准,总共包括391项分析,其中38%的分析发现了少数民族压力因素与生物学结果之间的关联(当研究异常值被删除时,44%的分析发现了这种关联)。少数民族压力的所有因素都与结果相关:多成分测量、偏见事件和条件以及结构性耻辱显示了最高比例的关联。在一般身体健康、睡眠、免疫、心血管、代谢、激素、大脑健康、适应负荷、表观遗传和转录调节方面,检测到少数民族压力与这些因素的关联。在睡眠、免疫、心血管和激素结果中发现了最高比例的关联。这些研究在性别少数人群和性少数人群中证明了少数群体压力和生物学结果之间的关联。未来的研究应考虑提高方法论的严谨性,并扩大我们对这些关系的调节者和中介者的理解。
Minority stress in relation to biological outcomes among sexual and gender minority people: a systematic review and update.
Here we present an updated systematic review identifying studies published 2019-2024, since our prior systematic review in 2020, that examine the association between minority stress and a biological outcome among sexual and gender minority (SGM) people. Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase were queried to identify studies that examined an association between minority stress (including prejudice events and conditions, anticipation of rejection and discrimination, concealment or disclosure of SGM identity(ies), internalized stigma, or structural stigma) and a biological health outcome among SGM people. Included studies were coded for methodological approaches, study population, minority stress measure, biological outcomes, count of overall analyses, and count of analyses where an association was detected. Fifty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and included a total of 391 analyses between an element of minority stress and a biological outcome, among which 38% of analyses detected an association (44% detected this association when study outliers were removed). All elements of minority stress demonstrated associations with outcomes: multicomponent measures, prejudice events and conditions, and structural stigma demonstrated the highest proportion of associations. Associations with minority stress were detected for general physical health, sleep, immune, cardiovascular, metabolic, hormonal, brain health, allostatic load, epigenetic and transcriptional regulation. The highest proportion of associations were detected among sleep, immune, cardiovascular, and hormonal outcomes. These studies evidence associations between minority stress and biological outcomes among gender minority people in addition to evidence among sexual minority people. Future research should consider increasing rigor in methodology and expanding our understanding of moderators and mediators of these relationships.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders. Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.