卷积神经网络模型在磁共振成像脑膜瘤分割中的表现:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Neuroinformatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1007/s12021-024-09704-3
Ting-Wei Wang, Jia-Sheng Hong, Wei-Kai Lee, Yi-Hui Lin, Huai-Che Yang, Cheng-Chia Lee, Hung-Chieh Chen, Hsiu-Mei Wu, Weir Chiang You, Yu-Te Wu
{"title":"卷积神经网络模型在磁共振成像脑膜瘤分割中的表现:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ting-Wei Wang, Jia-Sheng Hong, Wei-Kai Lee, Yi-Hui Lin, Huai-Che Yang, Cheng-Chia Lee, Hung-Chieh Chen, Hsiu-Mei Wu, Weir Chiang You, Yu-Te Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12021-024-09704-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumor, presents significant challenges in MRI-based diagnosis and treatment planning due to its diverse manifestations. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of meningioma segmentation from MRI scans. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of CNN models in segmenting meningioma using MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception to December 20, 2023, to identify studies that used CNN models for meningioma segmentation in MRI. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the CLAIM and QUADAS-2 tools. The primary variable was segmentation accuracy, which was evaluated using the Sørensen-Dice coefficient. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were performed to investigate the effects of MRI sequence, CNN architecture, and training dataset size on model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, comprising 4,828 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled Dice score across all studies was 89% (95% CI: 87-90%). Internal validation studies yielded a pooled Dice score of 88% (95% CI: 85-91%), while external validation studies reported a pooled Dice score of 89% (95% CI: 88-90%). Models trained on multiple MRI sequences consistently outperformed those trained on single sequences. Meta-regression indicated that training dataset size did not significantly influence segmentation accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNN models are highly effective for meningioma segmentation in MRI, particularly during the use of diverse datasets from multiple MRI sequences. This finding highlights the importance of data quality and imaging sequence selection in the development of CNN models. Standardization of MRI data acquisition and preprocessing may improve the performance of CNN models, thereby facilitating their clinical adoption for the optimal diagnosis and treatment of meningioma.</p>","PeriodicalId":49761,"journal":{"name":"Neuroinformatics","volume":"23 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706894/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Convolutional Neural Network Models in Meningioma Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Wei Wang, Jia-Sheng Hong, Wei-Kai Lee, Yi-Hui Lin, Huai-Che Yang, Cheng-Chia Lee, Hung-Chieh Chen, Hsiu-Mei Wu, Weir Chiang You, Yu-Te Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12021-024-09704-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumor, presents significant challenges in MRI-based diagnosis and treatment planning due to its diverse manifestations. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of meningioma segmentation from MRI scans. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of CNN models in segmenting meningioma using MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception to December 20, 2023, to identify studies that used CNN models for meningioma segmentation in MRI. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the CLAIM and QUADAS-2 tools. The primary variable was segmentation accuracy, which was evaluated using the Sørensen-Dice coefficient. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were performed to investigate the effects of MRI sequence, CNN architecture, and training dataset size on model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies, comprising 4,828 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled Dice score across all studies was 89% (95% CI: 87-90%). Internal validation studies yielded a pooled Dice score of 88% (95% CI: 85-91%), while external validation studies reported a pooled Dice score of 89% (95% CI: 88-90%). Models trained on multiple MRI sequences consistently outperformed those trained on single sequences. Meta-regression indicated that training dataset size did not significantly influence segmentation accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNN models are highly effective for meningioma segmentation in MRI, particularly during the use of diverse datasets from multiple MRI sequences. This finding highlights the importance of data quality and imaging sequence selection in the development of CNN models. Standardization of MRI data acquisition and preprocessing may improve the performance of CNN models, thereby facilitating their clinical adoption for the optimal diagnosis and treatment of meningioma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroinformatics\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706894/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-024-09704-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-024-09704-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑膜瘤是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤,由于其表现多样,在mri诊断和治疗计划方面面临着重大挑战。卷积神经网络(cnn)在提高MRI扫描脑膜瘤分割的准确性和效率方面表现出了希望。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了CNN模型在MRI分割脑膜瘤中的有效性。方法:根据PRISMA指南,我们检索PubMed, Embase和Web of Science,从它们成立到2023年12月20日,以确定在MRI中使用CNN模型进行脑膜瘤分割的研究。使用CLAIM和QUADAS-2工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。主要变量为分割精度,采用Sørensen-Dice系数对分割精度进行评价。通过meta分析、亚组分析和meta回归来研究MRI序列、CNN架构和训练数据集大小对模型性能的影响。结果:9项研究,包括4,828例患者,被纳入分析。所有研究的汇总Dice评分为89% (95% CI: 87-90%)。内部验证研究的汇总Dice评分为88% (95% CI: 85-91%),而外部验证研究报告的汇总Dice评分为89% (95% CI: 88-90%)。在多个MRI序列上训练的模型始终优于在单个序列上训练的模型。元回归表明,训练数据集的大小对分割精度没有显著影响。结论:CNN模型对MRI中脑膜瘤分割非常有效,特别是在使用来自多个MRI序列的不同数据集时。这一发现突出了数据质量和成像序列选择在CNN模型开发中的重要性。MRI数据采集和预处理的标准化可以提高CNN模型的性能,从而促进其在临床上用于脑膜瘤的最佳诊断和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of Convolutional Neural Network Models in Meningioma Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Meningioma, the most common primary brain tumor, presents significant challenges in MRI-based diagnosis and treatment planning due to its diverse manifestations. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of meningioma segmentation from MRI scans. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the effectiveness of CNN models in segmenting meningioma using MRI.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from their inception to December 20, 2023, to identify studies that used CNN models for meningioma segmentation in MRI. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the CLAIM and QUADAS-2 tools. The primary variable was segmentation accuracy, which was evaluated using the Sørensen-Dice coefficient. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and meta-regression were performed to investigate the effects of MRI sequence, CNN architecture, and training dataset size on model performance.

Results: Nine studies, comprising 4,828 patients, were included in the analysis. The pooled Dice score across all studies was 89% (95% CI: 87-90%). Internal validation studies yielded a pooled Dice score of 88% (95% CI: 85-91%), while external validation studies reported a pooled Dice score of 89% (95% CI: 88-90%). Models trained on multiple MRI sequences consistently outperformed those trained on single sequences. Meta-regression indicated that training dataset size did not significantly influence segmentation accuracy.

Conclusion: CNN models are highly effective for meningioma segmentation in MRI, particularly during the use of diverse datasets from multiple MRI sequences. This finding highlights the importance of data quality and imaging sequence selection in the development of CNN models. Standardization of MRI data acquisition and preprocessing may improve the performance of CNN models, thereby facilitating their clinical adoption for the optimal diagnosis and treatment of meningioma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroinformatics
Neuroinformatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Neuroinformatics publishes original articles and reviews with an emphasis on data structure and software tools related to analysis, modeling, integration, and sharing in all areas of neuroscience research. The editors particularly invite contributions on: (1) Theory and methodology, including discussions on ontologies, modeling approaches, database design, and meta-analyses; (2) Descriptions of developed databases and software tools, and of the methods for their distribution; (3) Relevant experimental results, such as reports accompanie by the release of massive data sets; (4) Computational simulations of models integrating and organizing complex data; and (5) Neuroengineering approaches, including hardware, robotics, and information theory studies.
期刊最新文献
Generalized Coupled Matrix Tensor Factorization Method Based on Normalized Mutual Information for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI Data Analysis. Cardiac Heterogeneity Prediction by Cardio-Neural Network Simulation. Determination of the Time-frequency Features for Impulse Components in EEG Signals. Blood Flow Velocity Analysis in Cerebral Perforating Arteries on 7T 2D Phase Contrast MRI with an Open-Source Software Tool (SELMA). CDCG-UNet: Chaotic Optimization Assisted Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on Dilated Channel Gate Attention U-Net Model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1