从治疗到预防:强力霉素预防性传播感染的潜力。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Antibiotics-Basel Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.3390/antibiotics13121183
James Bird, Basil Alawyia, Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Danny Alon-Ellenbogen
{"title":"从治疗到预防:强力霉素预防性传播感染的潜力。","authors":"James Bird, Basil Alawyia, Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Danny Alon-Ellenbogen","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13121183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past two decades, the global incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis have increased significantly, particularly among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). This rise in STIs has spurred interest in new preventive measures, including doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP). Clinical trials in the United States and France have demonstrated the effectiveness of DoxyPEP in reducing both chlamydia and syphilis incidence among MSM and TGW; although, its efficacy against gonorrhea remains limited, and it was further found to be ineffective among cisgender women in Kenya. Due to the promising results, the CDC and the German STI Society have incorporated DoxyPEP into their guidelines for specific high-risk groups. However, the broader implementation of DoxyPEP presents several challenges and ethical concerns. Key issues involve the potential development of antimicrobial resistance, particularly among common STI pathogens like <i>C. trachomatis</i>, <i>M. genitalium</i>, and <i>N. gonorrhoeae</i>, as well as other bacteria such as <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Additionally, questions concerning equitable healthcare access, the potential impact on adherence to safer sex practices, and broader public health implications warrant careful consideration. Addressing these challenges necessitates a careful balance between the benefits and risks of DoxyPEP, as well as the implementation of strategies to mitigate negative outcomes while maximizing the impact on public health. Lastly, future research should explore the integration of DoxyPEP with other preventive strategies, such as vaccines, to enhance its effectiveness and reduce the global burden of STIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Cure to Prevention: Doxycycline's Potential in Prophylaxis for Sexually Transmitted Infections.\",\"authors\":\"James Bird, Basil Alawyia, Nikolaos Spernovasilis, Danny Alon-Ellenbogen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13121183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over the past two decades, the global incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis have increased significantly, particularly among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). This rise in STIs has spurred interest in new preventive measures, including doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP). Clinical trials in the United States and France have demonstrated the effectiveness of DoxyPEP in reducing both chlamydia and syphilis incidence among MSM and TGW; although, its efficacy against gonorrhea remains limited, and it was further found to be ineffective among cisgender women in Kenya. Due to the promising results, the CDC and the German STI Society have incorporated DoxyPEP into their guidelines for specific high-risk groups. However, the broader implementation of DoxyPEP presents several challenges and ethical concerns. Key issues involve the potential development of antimicrobial resistance, particularly among common STI pathogens like <i>C. trachomatis</i>, <i>M. genitalium</i>, and <i>N. gonorrhoeae</i>, as well as other bacteria such as <i>S. aureus</i> and <i>K. pneumoniae</i>. Additionally, questions concerning equitable healthcare access, the potential impact on adherence to safer sex practices, and broader public health implications warrant careful consideration. Addressing these challenges necessitates a careful balance between the benefits and risks of DoxyPEP, as well as the implementation of strategies to mitigate negative outcomes while maximizing the impact on public health. Lastly, future research should explore the integration of DoxyPEP with other preventive strategies, such as vaccines, to enhance its effectiveness and reduce the global burden of STIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"13 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121183\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13121183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去二十年中,淋病、衣原体和梅毒等性传播感染(STIs)的全球发病率显著增加,特别是在男男性行为的顺性男性(MSM)和变性女性(TGW)中。性传播感染的增加激发了人们对新的预防措施的兴趣,包括强力霉素暴露后预防(DoxyPEP)。在美国和法国的临床试验已经证明了DoxyPEP在降低MSM和TGW中衣原体和梅毒发病率方面的有效性;尽管如此,它对淋病的疗效仍然有限,并且进一步发现它对肯尼亚的顺性别妇女无效。由于有希望的结果,疾病预防控制中心和德国STI协会已将DoxyPEP纳入其针对特定高危人群的指南中。然而,DoxyPEP的广泛实施带来了一些挑战和道德问题。关键问题涉及抗菌素耐药性的潜在发展,特别是在沙眼衣原体、生殖支原体和淋病奈瑟菌等常见性传播感染病原体以及金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌等其他细菌中。此外,有关公平获得医疗保健、对遵守安全性行为的潜在影响以及更广泛的公共卫生影响的问题值得仔细考虑。应对这些挑战需要在DoxyPEP的益处和风险之间取得谨慎的平衡,并实施减轻负面后果的战略,同时最大限度地提高对公共卫生的影响。最后,未来的研究应探索DoxyPEP与其他预防策略(如疫苗)的整合,以提高其有效性并减轻全球性传播感染负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Cure to Prevention: Doxycycline's Potential in Prophylaxis for Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Over the past two decades, the global incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) such as gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis have increased significantly, particularly among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). This rise in STIs has spurred interest in new preventive measures, including doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (DoxyPEP). Clinical trials in the United States and France have demonstrated the effectiveness of DoxyPEP in reducing both chlamydia and syphilis incidence among MSM and TGW; although, its efficacy against gonorrhea remains limited, and it was further found to be ineffective among cisgender women in Kenya. Due to the promising results, the CDC and the German STI Society have incorporated DoxyPEP into their guidelines for specific high-risk groups. However, the broader implementation of DoxyPEP presents several challenges and ethical concerns. Key issues involve the potential development of antimicrobial resistance, particularly among common STI pathogens like C. trachomatis, M. genitalium, and N. gonorrhoeae, as well as other bacteria such as S. aureus and K. pneumoniae. Additionally, questions concerning equitable healthcare access, the potential impact on adherence to safer sex practices, and broader public health implications warrant careful consideration. Addressing these challenges necessitates a careful balance between the benefits and risks of DoxyPEP, as well as the implementation of strategies to mitigate negative outcomes while maximizing the impact on public health. Lastly, future research should explore the integration of DoxyPEP with other preventive strategies, such as vaccines, to enhance its effectiveness and reduce the global burden of STIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
期刊最新文献
Management and Outcome of Invasive Clindamycin-Resistant MRSA Community-Associated Infections in Children. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Principal Component Analysis Strategies Lead to Anti-Tuberculosis Natural Product Discovery from Actinomycetes. Evaluation of Cinnamon Essential Oil and Its Emulsion on Biofilm-Associated Components of Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Strains. A VersaTile Approach to Reprogram the Specificity of the R2-Type Tailocin Towards Different Serotypes of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antibiotic Prescription Practice and Resistance Patterns of Bacterial Isolates from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study from Jordan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1