加拿大农村急诊医师使用点护理超声的经验。

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00829-7
Rafiq Andani, Queen Jacques, Yanqing Yi, Tomislav Jelic, Taft Micks, David Bradbury-Squires, Jordan Stone-McLean, Michael Parsons, Gillian Sheppard
{"title":"加拿大农村急诊医师使用点护理超声的经验。","authors":"Rafiq Andani, Queen Jacques, Yanqing Yi, Tomislav Jelic, Taft Micks, David Bradbury-Squires, Jordan Stone-McLean, Michael Parsons, Gillian Sheppard","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00829-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapidly evolving and clinically significant skill set that has potential for improving patient care for the approximately 7 million Canadians living in rural and under-resourced environments. A national appraisal of rural POCUS training and utilization is needed to understand barriers to funding and training for rural emergency physicians in Canada. The primary objective of this study was to determine the current level of training and types of POCUS utilization by rural emergency physicians in Canada. The secondary objective was to describe the barriers to POCUS use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of POCUS education, training, and utilization was distributed, in English and French, to rural emergency physicians across Canada via the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, Society of Rural Physicians of Canada and College of Family Physicians of Canada listservs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-eight physicians completed the survey with a response rate of 10%. Most were family physicians registered with the College of Family Physicians of Canada (68%) and worked in rural communities with under 10,000 residents (64%). The majority of respondents (94%) used a POCUS device in their practice, with 40% always using POCUS and 84% having access to a high-quality device. POCUS was commonly used for abdominal aortic aneurysm, cardiac, and obstetrical exams. Key barriers to training were cost (62%), distance to the training center (48%), inability to take time off work (43%) and insufficient hospital administration support (21%). Eighty percent of respondents agreed that POCUS was valuable in rural and remote areas with limited access to diagnostic imaging and 78% agreed that institutions should fund POCUS training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS is used daily for patient care in rural Canadian emergency departments. Despite widespread access to POCUS, rural emergency physicians face significant barriers in training and utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"Rafiq Andani, Queen Jacques, Yanqing Yi, Tomislav Jelic, Taft Micks, David Bradbury-Squires, Jordan Stone-McLean, Michael Parsons, Gillian Sheppard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-024-00829-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapidly evolving and clinically significant skill set that has potential for improving patient care for the approximately 7 million Canadians living in rural and under-resourced environments. A national appraisal of rural POCUS training and utilization is needed to understand barriers to funding and training for rural emergency physicians in Canada. The primary objective of this study was to determine the current level of training and types of POCUS utilization by rural emergency physicians in Canada. The secondary objective was to describe the barriers to POCUS use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey of POCUS education, training, and utilization was distributed, in English and French, to rural emergency physicians across Canada via the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, Society of Rural Physicians of Canada and College of Family Physicians of Canada listservs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and sixty-eight physicians completed the survey with a response rate of 10%. Most were family physicians registered with the College of Family Physicians of Canada (68%) and worked in rural communities with under 10,000 residents (64%). The majority of respondents (94%) used a POCUS device in their practice, with 40% always using POCUS and 84% having access to a high-quality device. POCUS was commonly used for abdominal aortic aneurysm, cardiac, and obstetrical exams. Key barriers to training were cost (62%), distance to the training center (48%), inability to take time off work (43%) and insufficient hospital administration support (21%). Eighty percent of respondents agreed that POCUS was valuable in rural and remote areas with limited access to diagnostic imaging and 78% agreed that institutions should fund POCUS training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS is used daily for patient care in rural Canadian emergency departments. Despite widespread access to POCUS, rural emergency physicians face significant barriers in training and utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00829-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00829-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:点护理超声(POCUS)是一种快速发展和临床意义重大的技能,有可能改善大约700万加拿大人生活在农村和资源不足环境中的患者护理。需要对农村POCUS培训和利用情况进行全国评估,以了解加拿大农村急诊医生在供资和培训方面的障碍。本研究的主要目的是确定加拿大农村急诊医生目前的培训水平和POCUS的使用类型。第二个目的是描述POCUS使用的障碍。方法:通过加拿大急诊医师协会、加拿大农村医师协会和加拿大家庭医师学院的网站,以英语和法语向加拿大各地的农村急诊医师分发POCUS教育、培训和使用情况的在线调查。结果:168名医生完成调查,回复率为10%。大多数是在加拿大家庭医生学院注册的家庭医生(68%),在居民少于10,000人的农村社区工作(64%)。大多数受访者(94%)在实践中使用POCUS设备,40%的人一直使用POCUS, 84%的人可以使用高质量的设备。POCUS常用于腹主动脉瘤、心脏和产科检查。培训的主要障碍是成本(62%)、距离培训中心(48%)、无法请假(43%)和医院管理支持不足(21%)。80%的受访者同意POCUS在农村和偏远地区的诊断成像有限,78%的受访者同意机构应该资助POCUS培训。结论:POCUS在加拿大农村急诊科的日常护理中得到广泛应用。尽管广泛获得POCUS,但农村急诊医生在培训和利用方面面临重大障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound.

Objectives: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a rapidly evolving and clinically significant skill set that has potential for improving patient care for the approximately 7 million Canadians living in rural and under-resourced environments. A national appraisal of rural POCUS training and utilization is needed to understand barriers to funding and training for rural emergency physicians in Canada. The primary objective of this study was to determine the current level of training and types of POCUS utilization by rural emergency physicians in Canada. The secondary objective was to describe the barriers to POCUS use.

Methods: An online survey of POCUS education, training, and utilization was distributed, in English and French, to rural emergency physicians across Canada via the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, Society of Rural Physicians of Canada and College of Family Physicians of Canada listservs.

Results: One hundred and sixty-eight physicians completed the survey with a response rate of 10%. Most were family physicians registered with the College of Family Physicians of Canada (68%) and worked in rural communities with under 10,000 residents (64%). The majority of respondents (94%) used a POCUS device in their practice, with 40% always using POCUS and 84% having access to a high-quality device. POCUS was commonly used for abdominal aortic aneurysm, cardiac, and obstetrical exams. Key barriers to training were cost (62%), distance to the training center (48%), inability to take time off work (43%) and insufficient hospital administration support (21%). Eighty percent of respondents agreed that POCUS was valuable in rural and remote areas with limited access to diagnostic imaging and 78% agreed that institutions should fund POCUS training.

Conclusion: POCUS is used daily for patient care in rural Canadian emergency departments. Despite widespread access to POCUS, rural emergency physicians face significant barriers in training and utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just the facts: angioedema in the emergency department. Advancing emergency medicine: embracing new horizons. Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound. Andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Crowned dens syndrome: a rare differential diagnosis of meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1