急诊科双性人护理指南的系统回顾。

IF 2.4 CJEM Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s43678-024-00797-y
Michael I Kruse, Katie Baas-Sylvester, Vanessa Wildeman, Alexandra Clarizio, Suneel Upadhye, Blair L Bigham
{"title":"急诊科双性人护理指南的系统回顾。","authors":"Michael I Kruse, Katie Baas-Sylvester, Vanessa Wildeman, Alexandra Clarizio, Suneel Upadhye, Blair L Bigham","doi":"10.1007/s43678-024-00797-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intersex people make up 1.7-4% of the population of North America. A recent scoping review of emergency department (ED) relevant literature for the care of sexual and gender minorities found almost no representation of this population. Intersex people have unique equity, diversity, and inclusion needs in the ED, so we undertook a review of international guidelines to identify ED-relevant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PRISMA criteria, we systematically searched OVID Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the gray literature for any clinical practice guideline (CPG) or best practice statement (BPS) published until Oct 21, 2022. We included articles in English, which included care of intersex people of any age, in any setting, region, or nation, and were of national or international in scope. We excluded primary research, systematic or narrative reviews, non-CPS or BPS statements, editorials, articles of regional or individual hospital scope, or if a more recent version had been published. Recommendations relevant to the ED were identified and the guideline and recommendations scored for quality using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX tools respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1599 studies identified, 1400 studies were excluded, 199 full-text reviews completed, and 95 studies included for evaluation. There were no ED-relevant recommendations found among these guideline documents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A systematic review of the literature for ED-relevant guidelines for the care of Intersex populations returned no results. Given the risk of increasing barriers to care for intersex people, and the increasing use of the ED for primary care, the requirements of Intersex people need to be investigated and integrated into future development of a CPG for care of sexual and gender minority populations in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"32-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of guidelines for care of intersex people in the emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Michael I Kruse, Katie Baas-Sylvester, Vanessa Wildeman, Alexandra Clarizio, Suneel Upadhye, Blair L Bigham\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43678-024-00797-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intersex people make up 1.7-4% of the population of North America. A recent scoping review of emergency department (ED) relevant literature for the care of sexual and gender minorities found almost no representation of this population. Intersex people have unique equity, diversity, and inclusion needs in the ED, so we undertook a review of international guidelines to identify ED-relevant recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PRISMA criteria, we systematically searched OVID Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the gray literature for any clinical practice guideline (CPG) or best practice statement (BPS) published until Oct 21, 2022. We included articles in English, which included care of intersex people of any age, in any setting, region, or nation, and were of national or international in scope. We excluded primary research, systematic or narrative reviews, non-CPS or BPS statements, editorials, articles of regional or individual hospital scope, or if a more recent version had been published. Recommendations relevant to the ED were identified and the guideline and recommendations scored for quality using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX tools respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1599 studies identified, 1400 studies were excluded, 199 full-text reviews completed, and 95 studies included for evaluation. There were no ED-relevant recommendations found among these guideline documents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A systematic review of the literature for ED-relevant guidelines for the care of Intersex populations returned no results. Given the risk of increasing barriers to care for intersex people, and the increasing use of the ED for primary care, the requirements of Intersex people need to be investigated and integrated into future development of a CPG for care of sexual and gender minority populations in the ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CJEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"32-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CJEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00797-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-024-00797-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双性人占北美人口的1.7% -4%。最近对急诊科(ED)关于性和性别少数群体护理的相关文献进行了范围审查,发现几乎没有这一人群的代表性。阴阳人在ED中具有独特的公平性、多样性和包容性需求,因此我们对国际指南进行了审查,以确定ED相关的建议。方法:使用PRISMA标准,我们系统地检索OVID Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和灰色文献,查找截至2022年10月21日发表的任何临床实践指南(CPG)或最佳实践声明(BPS)。我们纳入了英文文章,包括任何年龄、任何环境、地区或国家的双性人护理,并且范围为国内或国际。我们排除了主要研究、系统或叙述性综述、非cps或BPS声明、社论、地区或个别医院范围的文章,或最近发表的版本。确定了与ED相关的建议,并分别使用AGREE-II和AGREE-REX工具对指南和建议的质量进行了评分。结果:在1599项研究中,有1400项研究被排除,199项全文综述被完成,95项研究被纳入评估。在这些指导文件中没有发现ed相关的建议。结论:对双性人ed相关治疗指南的文献进行系统回顾没有结果。鉴于对双性人的护理障碍日益增加的风险,以及越来越多地将双性人作为初级保健,需要对双性人的需求进行调查,并将其纳入未来发展的CPG中,以照顾ED中的性和性别少数人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic review of guidelines for care of intersex people in the emergency department.

Purpose: Intersex people make up 1.7-4% of the population of North America. A recent scoping review of emergency department (ED) relevant literature for the care of sexual and gender minorities found almost no representation of this population. Intersex people have unique equity, diversity, and inclusion needs in the ED, so we undertook a review of international guidelines to identify ED-relevant recommendations.

Methods: Using the PRISMA criteria, we systematically searched OVID Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the gray literature for any clinical practice guideline (CPG) or best practice statement (BPS) published until Oct 21, 2022. We included articles in English, which included care of intersex people of any age, in any setting, region, or nation, and were of national or international in scope. We excluded primary research, systematic or narrative reviews, non-CPS or BPS statements, editorials, articles of regional or individual hospital scope, or if a more recent version had been published. Recommendations relevant to the ED were identified and the guideline and recommendations scored for quality using the AGREE-II and AGREE-REX tools respectively.

Results: Of 1599 studies identified, 1400 studies were excluded, 199 full-text reviews completed, and 95 studies included for evaluation. There were no ED-relevant recommendations found among these guideline documents.

Conclusion: A systematic review of the literature for ED-relevant guidelines for the care of Intersex populations returned no results. Given the risk of increasing barriers to care for intersex people, and the increasing use of the ED for primary care, the requirements of Intersex people need to be investigated and integrated into future development of a CPG for care of sexual and gender minority populations in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Just the facts: angioedema in the emergency department. Advancing emergency medicine: embracing new horizons. Rural Canadian emergency physician experiences using point-of-care ultrasound. Andexanet for factor Xa inhibitor-associated acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Crowned dens syndrome: a rare differential diagnosis of meningitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1