AGITG MONARCC:帕尼单抗单药和帕尼单抗加5-氟尿嘧啶作为RAS和BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌老年患者一线治疗的随机2期研究澳大利亚胃肠试验组(AGITG)的研究。

Matthew E Burge, David Espinoza, Katrin Marie Sjoquist, Derrick Hw Siu, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Lorraine A Chantrill, Christos Stelios Karapetis, Christopher B Steer, Sonia Yip, Jeff Cuff, Stephanie Winata, Jeanne Tie, Darshit Arunbhai Thaker, Ratnesh Srivastav, Ehtesham Abdi, Andrew Strickland, Eva Segelov, Alessandra Francesconi, Timothy Price, Rahul Ladwa, Warren Joubert, Niall C Tebbutt
{"title":"AGITG MONARCC:帕尼单抗单药和帕尼单抗加5-氟尿嘧啶作为RAS和BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌老年患者一线治疗的随机2期研究澳大利亚胃肠试验组(AGITG)的研究。","authors":"Matthew E Burge, David Espinoza, Katrin Marie Sjoquist, Derrick Hw Siu, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Lorraine A Chantrill, Christos Stelios Karapetis, Christopher B Steer, Sonia Yip, Jeff Cuff, Stephanie Winata, Jeanne Tie, Darshit Arunbhai Thaker, Ratnesh Srivastav, Ehtesham Abdi, Andrew Strickland, Eva Segelov, Alessandra Francesconi, Timothy Price, Rahul Ladwa, Warren Joubert, Niall C Tebbutt","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Panitumumab (pan) plus chemotherapy is a preferred first-line therapy for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Older patients may not be suitable for combination regimens. We investigated 2 lower intensity pan-containing regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, noncomparative, randomized (1:1) phase 2 study of pan alone (Arm A) or pan plus FU (Arm B). Previously untreated mCRC were ≥70 years; RAS/BRAF wild type.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), feasibility of geriatric assessments and overall treatment utility (OTU)-a composite measure based on radiological response, clinical progress, toxicity and patient-reported treatment worth. Planned sample size was 40 patients per arm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 patients (Arm A n = 19, Arm B n = 17) were randomized between June 2018 and June 2021. Median age was 79 and 80 years respectively. 6-month PFS 63% (95% CI 38%-80%) arm A 82% (95%CI 55%-94%) Arm B. Median OS 21 months Arm A (95%CI 13-31) 28 (95%CI 14-39) months Arm B. RR 47% and 65% Arms A and B respectively. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were completed in >80% of patients. At week 16, OTU was categorized as good in 92% (Arm A) and 90% (Arm B). No unexpected adverse events were seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Six-month PFS in both arms was consistent with that achieved with FU/bev, whilst the rate was numerically higher for Arm B. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were feasible and OTU was high. Both treatment arms might be suitable in appropriately selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AGITG MONARCC: A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy and Panitumumab Plus 5-Fluorouracil as First-Line Therapy for Older Patients With RAS and BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Study by the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG).\",\"authors\":\"Matthew E Burge, David Espinoza, Katrin Marie Sjoquist, Derrick Hw Siu, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Lorraine A Chantrill, Christos Stelios Karapetis, Christopher B Steer, Sonia Yip, Jeff Cuff, Stephanie Winata, Jeanne Tie, Darshit Arunbhai Thaker, Ratnesh Srivastav, Ehtesham Abdi, Andrew Strickland, Eva Segelov, Alessandra Francesconi, Timothy Price, Rahul Ladwa, Warren Joubert, Niall C Tebbutt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Panitumumab (pan) plus chemotherapy is a preferred first-line therapy for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Older patients may not be suitable for combination regimens. We investigated 2 lower intensity pan-containing regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective, noncomparative, randomized (1:1) phase 2 study of pan alone (Arm A) or pan plus FU (Arm B). Previously untreated mCRC were ≥70 years; RAS/BRAF wild type.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), feasibility of geriatric assessments and overall treatment utility (OTU)-a composite measure based on radiological response, clinical progress, toxicity and patient-reported treatment worth. Planned sample size was 40 patients per arm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>36 patients (Arm A n = 19, Arm B n = 17) were randomized between June 2018 and June 2021. Median age was 79 and 80 years respectively. 6-month PFS 63% (95% CI 38%-80%) arm A 82% (95%CI 55%-94%) Arm B. Median OS 21 months Arm A (95%CI 13-31) 28 (95%CI 14-39) months Arm B. RR 47% and 65% Arms A and B respectively. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were completed in >80% of patients. At week 16, OTU was categorized as good in 92% (Arm A) and 90% (Arm B). No unexpected adverse events were seen.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Six-month PFS in both arms was consistent with that achieved with FU/bev, whilst the rate was numerically higher for Arm B. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were feasible and OTU was high. Both treatment arms might be suitable in appropriately selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.11.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:帕尼珠单抗(Panitumumab, pan)联合化疗是不可切除的RAS和BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的首选一线治疗方法。老年患者可能不适合联合用药。我们研究了2种低强度的泛含方案。方法:前瞻性,非比较,随机(1:1)2期研究,pan单独(A组)或pan加FU (B组)。先前未治疗的mCRC≥70年;RAS/BRAF野生型。主要终点:6个月无进展生存(PFS)。次要终点包括:总生存期(OS)、缓解率(RR)、老年评估的可行性和总治疗效用(OTU)——一种基于放射反应、临床进展、毒性和患者报告的治疗价值的综合指标。计划样本量为每组40例患者。结果:在2018年6月至2021年6月期间,36例患者(A组n = 19, B组n = 17)被随机分组。中位年龄分别为79岁和80岁。6个月PFS 63% (95%CI 38%-80%) A组82% (95%CI 55%-94%) B组中位OS 21个月A组(95%CI 13-31) 28个月(95%CI 14-39) B组RR分别为47%和65% A组和B组。80%的患者完成了基线综合老年评估。在第16周,92% (A组)和90% (B组)的OTU被归类为良好。未见意外不良事件。结论:两个组的6个月PFS与FU/bev组一致,而b组的比率更高。基线综合老年评估是可行的,OTU很高。两种治疗方法可能都适用于适当选择的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AGITG MONARCC: A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy and Panitumumab Plus 5-Fluorouracil as First-Line Therapy for Older Patients With RAS and BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Study by the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG).

Background: Panitumumab (pan) plus chemotherapy is a preferred first-line therapy for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Older patients may not be suitable for combination regimens. We investigated 2 lower intensity pan-containing regimens.

Methods: Prospective, noncomparative, randomized (1:1) phase 2 study of pan alone (Arm A) or pan plus FU (Arm B). Previously untreated mCRC were ≥70 years; RAS/BRAF wild type.

Primary endpoint: 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), feasibility of geriatric assessments and overall treatment utility (OTU)-a composite measure based on radiological response, clinical progress, toxicity and patient-reported treatment worth. Planned sample size was 40 patients per arm.

Results: 36 patients (Arm A n = 19, Arm B n = 17) were randomized between June 2018 and June 2021. Median age was 79 and 80 years respectively. 6-month PFS 63% (95% CI 38%-80%) arm A 82% (95%CI 55%-94%) Arm B. Median OS 21 months Arm A (95%CI 13-31) 28 (95%CI 14-39) months Arm B. RR 47% and 65% Arms A and B respectively. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were completed in >80% of patients. At week 16, OTU was categorized as good in 92% (Arm A) and 90% (Arm B). No unexpected adverse events were seen.

Conclusions: Six-month PFS in both arms was consistent with that achieved with FU/bev, whilst the rate was numerically higher for Arm B. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were feasible and OTU was high. Both treatment arms might be suitable in appropriately selected patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MDTB) in the Management of Colorectal Cancer (CRC). Aflibercept-Based and Bevacizumab-Based Second Line Regimens in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score Weighted-Analysis from a Multicenter Cohort. Multidisciplinary Team Meeting Significantly Enhances Disease-Free Survival in Stage II-III Rectal Cancer. SATB2 Expression Affects Chemotherapy Metabolism and Immune Checkpoint Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer. Organ Preservation After Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1