急诊科/医院老年人虐待反应项目服务的老年人的长期轨迹

Daniel Baek, Elaine Gottesman, Lena K Makaroun, Alyssa Elman, Michael E Stern, Amy Shaw, Mary R Mulcare, Jennine McAuley, Veronica M LoFaso, Jaclyn Itzkowitz, E-Shien Chang, David Hancock, Elizabeth M Bloemen, Daniel M Lindberg, Rahul Sharma, Mark S Lachs, Karl Pillemer, Tony Rosen
{"title":"急诊科/医院老年人虐待反应项目服务的老年人的长期轨迹","authors":"Daniel Baek, Elaine Gottesman, Lena K Makaroun, Alyssa Elman, Michael E Stern, Amy Shaw, Mary R Mulcare, Jennine McAuley, Veronica M LoFaso, Jaclyn Itzkowitz, E-Shien Chang, David Hancock, Elizabeth M Bloemen, Daniel M Lindberg, Rahul Sharma, Mark S Lachs, Karl Pillemer, Tony Rosen","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization provides an opportunity to identify elder mistreatment and initiate intervention, but this seldom occurs. To address this, we developed the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT), a novel interdisciplinary consultation service. We explored the long-term trajectories of patients receiving VEPT evaluation and intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed up at multiple intervals for 12 months older adults seen by VEPT from 9/1/2020-3/27/2023 with high or moderate concern for mistreatment who were discharged to the community, an elder abuse shelter, or rehabilitation facilities. We collected information through telephone calls to the older adult and others involved. We also analyzed separately cases in which the patient re-presented to the ED/hospital with VEPT consultation during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 older adults met criteria for follow-up, and 30 of these (16.4%) died within 12 months. At 1 month, elder mistreatment was no longer occurring in 47.5% and still occurring but reduced in 20.3%, with 29.7% having no contact with the perpetrator and 17.8% having reduced contact. At 12 months, elder mistreatment was no longer occurring in 60.9% and still occurring but reduced in 14.5%, with 34.8% having no contact with the perpetrator and 17.4% having reduced contact. During the 12-month follow-up period, 16 (10.2%) patients re-presented to the ED with VEPT consultation, with 12 having persistent concern for ongoing elder mistreatment. Reasons included older adults/caregivers not accepting intervention or being willing to separate as well as VEPT reliance on community-based agencies and programs after discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed improved post-discharge safety for elder mistreatment victims who engaged with the VEPT program, with this increased safety durable over 1 year. Re-presentations highlighted the complexity of elder mistreatment intervention. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential value of an ED/hospital-based elder mistreatment response team, a promising new geriatric care model.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Trajectories of Older Adults Served by an Emergency Department/Hospital-Based Elder Mistreatment Response Program.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Baek, Elaine Gottesman, Lena K Makaroun, Alyssa Elman, Michael E Stern, Amy Shaw, Mary R Mulcare, Jennine McAuley, Veronica M LoFaso, Jaclyn Itzkowitz, E-Shien Chang, David Hancock, Elizabeth M Bloemen, Daniel M Lindberg, Rahul Sharma, Mark S Lachs, Karl Pillemer, Tony Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization provides an opportunity to identify elder mistreatment and initiate intervention, but this seldom occurs. To address this, we developed the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT), a novel interdisciplinary consultation service. We explored the long-term trajectories of patients receiving VEPT evaluation and intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed up at multiple intervals for 12 months older adults seen by VEPT from 9/1/2020-3/27/2023 with high or moderate concern for mistreatment who were discharged to the community, an elder abuse shelter, or rehabilitation facilities. We collected information through telephone calls to the older adult and others involved. We also analyzed separately cases in which the patient re-presented to the ED/hospital with VEPT consultation during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 older adults met criteria for follow-up, and 30 of these (16.4%) died within 12 months. At 1 month, elder mistreatment was no longer occurring in 47.5% and still occurring but reduced in 20.3%, with 29.7% having no contact with the perpetrator and 17.8% having reduced contact. At 12 months, elder mistreatment was no longer occurring in 60.9% and still occurring but reduced in 14.5%, with 34.8% having no contact with the perpetrator and 17.4% having reduced contact. During the 12-month follow-up period, 16 (10.2%) patients re-presented to the ED with VEPT consultation, with 12 having persistent concern for ongoing elder mistreatment. Reasons included older adults/caregivers not accepting intervention or being willing to separate as well as VEPT reliance on community-based agencies and programs after discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed improved post-discharge safety for elder mistreatment victims who engaged with the VEPT program, with this increased safety durable over 1 year. Re-presentations highlighted the complexity of elder mistreatment intervention. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential value of an ED/hospital-based elder mistreatment response team, a promising new geriatric care model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)访问或住院提供了一个机会,以确定老年人虐待和启动干预,但这种情况很少发生。为了解决这个问题,我们建立了弱势老年人保护小组(VEPT),这是一种新颖的跨学科咨询服务。我们探讨了接受VEPT评估和干预的患者的长期轨迹。方法:我们对在2020年1月9日至2023年3月27日期间接受VEPT检查的、对虐待有高度或中度关注的12个月老年人进行了多次随访,这些老年人出院后进入社区、虐待老年人收容所或康复机构。我们通过给老人和其他相关人员打电话来收集信息。我们还单独分析了患者在随访期间再次出现在ED/医院进行VEPT咨询的病例。结果:157名老年人符合随访标准,其中30人(16.4%)在12个月内死亡。在1个月时,47.5%的老人不再受到虐待,20.3%的老人仍然受到虐待,但有所减少,其中29.7%的人与施暴者没有接触,17.8%的人与施暴者接触减少。在12个月时,60.9%的老年人不再遭受虐待,14.5%的老年人仍在遭受虐待,但有所减少,其中34.8%的人与施暴者没有接触,17.4%的人与施暴者接触减少。在12个月的随访期间,16例(10.2%)患者再次向急诊咨询了VEPT,其中12例持续关注正在进行的老年虐待。原因包括老年人/照顾者不接受干预或不愿意分开,以及VEPT在出院后依赖社区机构和项目。结论:我们观察到参与VEPT项目的老年虐待受害者出院后的安全性有所提高,这种增加的安全性持续超过1年。再介绍强调了老年人虐待干预的复杂性。总的来说,这些发现证明了急诊科/医院为基础的老年人虐待反应小组的潜在价值,这是一种有前途的新型老年护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Trajectories of Older Adults Served by an Emergency Department/Hospital-Based Elder Mistreatment Response Program.

Background: An emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization provides an opportunity to identify elder mistreatment and initiate intervention, but this seldom occurs. To address this, we developed the Vulnerable Elder Protection Team (VEPT), a novel interdisciplinary consultation service. We explored the long-term trajectories of patients receiving VEPT evaluation and intervention.

Methods: We followed up at multiple intervals for 12 months older adults seen by VEPT from 9/1/2020-3/27/2023 with high or moderate concern for mistreatment who were discharged to the community, an elder abuse shelter, or rehabilitation facilities. We collected information through telephone calls to the older adult and others involved. We also analyzed separately cases in which the patient re-presented to the ED/hospital with VEPT consultation during the follow-up period.

Results: A total of 157 older adults met criteria for follow-up, and 30 of these (16.4%) died within 12 months. At 1 month, elder mistreatment was no longer occurring in 47.5% and still occurring but reduced in 20.3%, with 29.7% having no contact with the perpetrator and 17.8% having reduced contact. At 12 months, elder mistreatment was no longer occurring in 60.9% and still occurring but reduced in 14.5%, with 34.8% having no contact with the perpetrator and 17.4% having reduced contact. During the 12-month follow-up period, 16 (10.2%) patients re-presented to the ED with VEPT consultation, with 12 having persistent concern for ongoing elder mistreatment. Reasons included older adults/caregivers not accepting intervention or being willing to separate as well as VEPT reliance on community-based agencies and programs after discharge.

Conclusions: We observed improved post-discharge safety for elder mistreatment victims who engaged with the VEPT program, with this increased safety durable over 1 year. Re-presentations highlighted the complexity of elder mistreatment intervention. Overall, these findings demonstrate the potential value of an ED/hospital-based elder mistreatment response team, a promising new geriatric care model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Application of an Electronic Frailty Index to Identify High-Risk Older Adults Using Electronic Health Record Data. Cancer and Accelerated Aging Research at the National Institutes of Health, 2013-2023: A Grant Portfolio Analysis. Home-Based Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Community-Dwelling, At-Risk, Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT. Inspiring Undergraduate Student Training in Alzheimer's Research (USTAR): Training the Next Generation of Aging Scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1