STEM领域性别差异的全球模式及其持续存在的原因

IF 16.8 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Nature reviews psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1038/s44159-024-00380-3
Sapna Cheryan, Ella J. Lombard, Fasika Hailu, Linh N. H. Pham, Katherine Weltzien
{"title":"STEM领域性别差异的全球模式及其持续存在的原因","authors":"Sapna Cheryan, Ella J. Lombard, Fasika Hailu, Linh N. H. Pham, Katherine Weltzien","doi":"10.1038/s44159-024-00380-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Women and girls are underrepresented in many, though not all, STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields around the world. In this Review, we describe four key factors that help explain the continued underrepresentation of women in STEM. In many parts of the world, women lack access to education and job opportunities, preventing them from pursuing STEM. In places where women do have educational and professional opportunities, masculine cultures — shaped by both masculine defaults and differential treatment — can hinder entry and retention of women in STEM fields. Addressing masculine cultures is important to increase the representation of women, and research has identified multiple promising avenues for intervention. When masculine cultures remain, gender disparities can be reduced by increasing the positive experiences of women and girls in STEM. Finally, choices made by men to enter some STEM fields also contribute to the underrepresentation of women in these fields. We conclude by reviewing promising future directions for research on gender disparities in STEM, including examining the intersections of these factors, sociopolitical and economic contexts, and the experiences of trans and non-binary individuals and people with multiple marginalized identities in STEM. Women remain underrepresented in some STEM fields throughout much of the world. In this Review, Cheryan and colleagues discuss four factors that might explain this underrepresentation — access to education and employment, masculine cultures, insufficient positive experiences, and men’s choices — and interventions that might help reduce these disparities.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"6-19"},"PeriodicalIF":16.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global patterns of gender disparities in STEM and explanations for their persistence\",\"authors\":\"Sapna Cheryan, Ella J. Lombard, Fasika Hailu, Linh N. H. Pham, Katherine Weltzien\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44159-024-00380-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Women and girls are underrepresented in many, though not all, STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields around the world. In this Review, we describe four key factors that help explain the continued underrepresentation of women in STEM. In many parts of the world, women lack access to education and job opportunities, preventing them from pursuing STEM. In places where women do have educational and professional opportunities, masculine cultures — shaped by both masculine defaults and differential treatment — can hinder entry and retention of women in STEM fields. Addressing masculine cultures is important to increase the representation of women, and research has identified multiple promising avenues for intervention. When masculine cultures remain, gender disparities can be reduced by increasing the positive experiences of women and girls in STEM. Finally, choices made by men to enter some STEM fields also contribute to the underrepresentation of women in these fields. We conclude by reviewing promising future directions for research on gender disparities in STEM, including examining the intersections of these factors, sociopolitical and economic contexts, and the experiences of trans and non-binary individuals and people with multiple marginalized identities in STEM. Women remain underrepresented in some STEM fields throughout much of the world. In this Review, Cheryan and colleagues discuss four factors that might explain this underrepresentation — access to education and employment, masculine cultures, insufficient positive experiences, and men’s choices — and interventions that might help reduce these disparities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature reviews psychology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"6-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature reviews psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-024-00380-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-024-00380-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在世界各地的许多(尽管不是全部)STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)领域,妇女和女孩的代表性不足。在这篇综述中,我们描述了四个关键因素,有助于解释女性在STEM领域的持续代表性不足。在世界许多地方,女性缺乏接受教育和就业的机会,这阻碍了她们追求STEM。在女性确实拥有教育和职业机会的地方,男性化文化——由男性化默认和差别待遇形成——可能会阻碍女性进入和留在STEM领域。解决男性化文化对增加女性的代表性很重要,研究已经确定了多种有希望的干预途径。当男性文化仍然存在时,性别差异可以通过增加妇女和女孩在STEM中的积极经历来减少。最后,男性进入一些STEM领域的选择也导致了女性在这些领域的代表性不足。最后,我们回顾了STEM中性别差异研究的未来发展方向,包括研究这些因素、社会政治和经济背景的交集,以及跨性别和非二元个体以及具有多种边缘化身份的人在STEM中的经历。在世界大部分地区,女性在一些STEM领域的代表性仍然不足。在这篇综述中,Cheryan和他的同事讨论了四个可能解释这种代表性不足的因素——教育和就业机会、男性化文化、积极经历不足和男性选择——以及可能有助于减少这些差异的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global patterns of gender disparities in STEM and explanations for their persistence
Women and girls are underrepresented in many, though not all, STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) fields around the world. In this Review, we describe four key factors that help explain the continued underrepresentation of women in STEM. In many parts of the world, women lack access to education and job opportunities, preventing them from pursuing STEM. In places where women do have educational and professional opportunities, masculine cultures — shaped by both masculine defaults and differential treatment — can hinder entry and retention of women in STEM fields. Addressing masculine cultures is important to increase the representation of women, and research has identified multiple promising avenues for intervention. When masculine cultures remain, gender disparities can be reduced by increasing the positive experiences of women and girls in STEM. Finally, choices made by men to enter some STEM fields also contribute to the underrepresentation of women in these fields. We conclude by reviewing promising future directions for research on gender disparities in STEM, including examining the intersections of these factors, sociopolitical and economic contexts, and the experiences of trans and non-binary individuals and people with multiple marginalized identities in STEM. Women remain underrepresented in some STEM fields throughout much of the world. In this Review, Cheryan and colleagues discuss four factors that might explain this underrepresentation — access to education and employment, masculine cultures, insufficient positive experiences, and men’s choices — and interventions that might help reduce these disparities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reply to ‘Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate’ Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization Structure-based dissociations provide agnostic evidence to the multiple-systems debate Reply to ‘Single and multiple systems in probabilistic categorization’ Attachment as a target mechanism in the mental health of child refugees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1