230例连续小前庭神经鞘瘤显微手术治疗的听力保护效果。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404
Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Tamara Wahlin, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman
{"title":"230例连续小前庭神经鞘瘤显微手术治疗的听力保护效果。","authors":"Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Tamara Wahlin, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) outcomes for patients with small sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) who elect to undergo microsurgical resection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary single-academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals 18 years or older with small sporadic VS (≤15 mm) who underwent microsurgical resection from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Microsurgical resection via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) or retrosigmoid (RS) approach.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative HP (word recognition score ≥ 50%) and facial nerve function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 230 consecutive patients with small sporadic VS who elected to undergo microsurgical resection, hearing was preserved in 61% of patients. When stratified by tumor size, patients with tumors ≤10 mm had a 72% hearing preservation rate. On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for hearing preservation were the presence of preoperative vertigo (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52) and tumor size. Patients with tumors between 0 to 5 mm and 5.1 to 10 mm had 3.62 higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-9.4) and 2.52 higher odds (95% CI, 1.30-4.9) of hearing preservation, respectively, when compared to patients with tumors that were larger than 10 mm. At the time of last follow-up, a House-Brackmann (HB) 1 or 2 was maintained in 95% (n = 218) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microsurgical resection for patients with small VS is associated with good hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes. Because larger tumor size portends poorer hearing outcomes, for patients who elect to undergo microsurgical resection for hearing preservation, proactive surgical intervention when tumors are ≤10 mm should be considered to increase the likelihood of hearing preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"303-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing Preservation Outcomes in 230 Consecutive Patients with Small Vestibular Schwannomas Treated with Microsurgery.\",\"authors\":\"Pawina Jiramongkolchai, Alexandra Vacaru, Tamara Wahlin, Marc S Schwartz, Rick A Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) outcomes for patients with small sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) who elect to undergo microsurgical resection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary single-academic institution.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals 18 years or older with small sporadic VS (≤15 mm) who underwent microsurgical resection from 2018 to 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Microsurgical resection via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) or retrosigmoid (RS) approach.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative HP (word recognition score ≥ 50%) and facial nerve function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 230 consecutive patients with small sporadic VS who elected to undergo microsurgical resection, hearing was preserved in 61% of patients. When stratified by tumor size, patients with tumors ≤10 mm had a 72% hearing preservation rate. On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for hearing preservation were the presence of preoperative vertigo (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52) and tumor size. Patients with tumors between 0 to 5 mm and 5.1 to 10 mm had 3.62 higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-9.4) and 2.52 higher odds (95% CI, 1.30-4.9) of hearing preservation, respectively, when compared to patients with tumors that were larger than 10 mm. At the time of last follow-up, a House-Brackmann (HB) 1 or 2 was maintained in 95% (n = 218) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Microsurgical resection for patients with small VS is associated with good hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes. Because larger tumor size portends poorer hearing outcomes, for patients who elect to undergo microsurgical resection for hearing preservation, proactive surgical intervention when tumors are ≤10 mm should be considered to increase the likelihood of hearing preservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"303-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004404","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价散发性小前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)患者显微手术切除后的听力保护效果。研究设计:回顾性研究。背景:高等院校。患者:2018 - 2023年接受显微手术切除的18岁及以上散发性小VS(≤15 mm)患者。干预措施:经中颅窝(MCF)或乙状窦后(RS)入路显微手术切除。主要观察指标:术后HP(单词识别评分≥50%)和面神经功能。结果:在连续230例选择显微手术切除的小散发性VS患者中,61%的患者保留了听力。当按肿瘤大小分层时,肿瘤≤10 mm的患者的听力保留率为72%。在多因素分析中,听力保存最重要的预后因素是术前眩晕的存在(OR, 0.33;95% CI, 0.17-0.52)和肿瘤大小。与肿瘤大于10 mm的患者相比,肿瘤在0- 5 mm和5.1 - 10 mm之间的患者听力保留的几率分别高出3.62 (95% CI, 1.39-9.4)和2.52 (95% CI, 1.30-4.9)。在最后一次随访时,95% (n = 218)患者保持House-Brackmann (HB) 1或2。结论:显微手术切除小VS患者可获得良好的听力保护和良好的面神经预后。由于肿瘤大小越大,听力效果越差,对于选择显微手术切除以保留听力的患者,应考虑肿瘤≤10 mm时的主动手术干预,以增加保留听力的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hearing Preservation Outcomes in 230 Consecutive Patients with Small Vestibular Schwannomas Treated with Microsurgery.

Objective: To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) outcomes for patients with small sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VS) who elect to undergo microsurgical resection.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary single-academic institution.

Patients: Individuals 18 years or older with small sporadic VS (≤15 mm) who underwent microsurgical resection from 2018 to 2023.

Interventions: Microsurgical resection via a middle cranial fossa (MCF) or retrosigmoid (RS) approach.

Main outcome measures: Postoperative HP (word recognition score ≥ 50%) and facial nerve function.

Results: Of the 230 consecutive patients with small sporadic VS who elected to undergo microsurgical resection, hearing was preserved in 61% of patients. When stratified by tumor size, patients with tumors ≤10 mm had a 72% hearing preservation rate. On multivariate analysis, the most important prognostic factors for hearing preservation were the presence of preoperative vertigo (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.52) and tumor size. Patients with tumors between 0 to 5 mm and 5.1 to 10 mm had 3.62 higher odds (95% CI, 1.39-9.4) and 2.52 higher odds (95% CI, 1.30-4.9) of hearing preservation, respectively, when compared to patients with tumors that were larger than 10 mm. At the time of last follow-up, a House-Brackmann (HB) 1 or 2 was maintained in 95% (n = 218) patients.

Conclusions: Microsurgical resection for patients with small VS is associated with good hearing preservation and excellent facial nerve outcomes. Because larger tumor size portends poorer hearing outcomes, for patients who elect to undergo microsurgical resection for hearing preservation, proactive surgical intervention when tumors are ≤10 mm should be considered to increase the likelihood of hearing preservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
期刊最新文献
Access to Ear and Hearing Care Globally: A Survey of Stakeholder Perceptions from the Lancet Commission on Global Hearing Loss. American Neurotology Society 60th Annual Spring Meeting Scientific Program May 16-17, 2025 New Orleans, LA: (ANS posters will be displayed on Friday & Saturday). AMERICAN OTOLOGICAL SOCIETY PRELIMINARY PROGRAM 158th Annual Meeting May 16-18, 2025 New Orleans, LA: (AOS Posters will be displayed on Friday and Saturday). Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss: Which Genes Next? Amplitude and Phase Changes in Electrocochleographic Real-Time Recordings During Cochlear Implantation and Its Relation to Pre- and Postoperative Hearing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1