Kelly C. Young-Wolff , Catherine A. Cortez , Joshua R. Nugent , Alisa A. Padon , Judith J. Prochaska , Sara R. Adams , Natalie E. Slama , Aurash J. Soroosh , Monique B. Does , Cynthia I. Campbell , Deborah Ansley , Carley Castellanos , Qiana L. Brown
{"title":"北加州孕妇大麻使用方式的社会人口统计学差异。","authors":"Kelly C. Young-Wolff , Catherine A. Cortez , Joshua R. Nugent , Alisa A. Padon , Judith J. Prochaska , Sara R. Adams , Natalie E. Slama , Aurash J. Soroosh , Monique B. Does , Cynthia I. Campbell , Deborah Ansley , Carley Castellanos , Qiana L. Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The potential risks of prenatal cannabis use may vary depending on how cannabis is administered, but little is known about modes of prenatal cannabis use. This study characterized prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of modes of prenatal cannabis use in California.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included patients with pregnancies between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 in a large healthcare system (3507 pregnancies [3454 individuals]) who self-reported prenatal cannabis use and mode of use (smoke, vape, edibles, dabs, and topicals) during universal screening at entrance to prenatal care. Multivariable regression models examined the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and modes of use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Smoking was the most common mode (71.1 %), followed by edibles (32.6 %), vaping (22.2 %), dabs (9.9 %), and topicals (4.6 %); 29.9 % endorsed multiple modes. Those who used edibles were the least likely to use daily (28.2 %), while those who dabbed (54.3 %) or used > 1 mode (45.3 %) were the most likely to use daily. In multivariable models, smoking was generally more common and edibles less common among those who were younger, non-Hispanic Black, and living in more deprived neighborhoods, vaping was more common among Hispanic individuals and less common among non-Hispanic Black individuals and those living in more deprived neighborhoods, and dabbing was more common among those who were younger and Hispanic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Modes of cannabis use during early pregnancy varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Future research is needed to test whether the risks of adverse outcomes or likelihood of persistent use during pregnancy vary depending on how cannabis is administered during pregnancy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 112546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic differences in modes of cannabis use among pregnant individuals in Northern California\",\"authors\":\"Kelly C. Young-Wolff , Catherine A. Cortez , Joshua R. Nugent , Alisa A. Padon , Judith J. Prochaska , Sara R. Adams , Natalie E. Slama , Aurash J. Soroosh , Monique B. Does , Cynthia I. Campbell , Deborah Ansley , Carley Castellanos , Qiana L. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.112546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The potential risks of prenatal cannabis use may vary depending on how cannabis is administered, but little is known about modes of prenatal cannabis use. This study characterized prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of modes of prenatal cannabis use in California.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional study included patients with pregnancies between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 in a large healthcare system (3507 pregnancies [3454 individuals]) who self-reported prenatal cannabis use and mode of use (smoke, vape, edibles, dabs, and topicals) during universal screening at entrance to prenatal care. Multivariable regression models examined the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and modes of use.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Smoking was the most common mode (71.1 %), followed by edibles (32.6 %), vaping (22.2 %), dabs (9.9 %), and topicals (4.6 %); 29.9 % endorsed multiple modes. Those who used edibles were the least likely to use daily (28.2 %), while those who dabbed (54.3 %) or used > 1 mode (45.3 %) were the most likely to use daily. In multivariable models, smoking was generally more common and edibles less common among those who were younger, non-Hispanic Black, and living in more deprived neighborhoods, vaping was more common among Hispanic individuals and less common among non-Hispanic Black individuals and those living in more deprived neighborhoods, and dabbing was more common among those who were younger and Hispanic.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Modes of cannabis use during early pregnancy varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Future research is needed to test whether the risks of adverse outcomes or likelihood of persistent use during pregnancy vary depending on how cannabis is administered during pregnancy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"267 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624014716\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871624014716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sociodemographic differences in modes of cannabis use among pregnant individuals in Northern California
Background
The potential risks of prenatal cannabis use may vary depending on how cannabis is administered, but little is known about modes of prenatal cannabis use. This study characterized prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of modes of prenatal cannabis use in California.
Methods
This cross-sectional study included patients with pregnancies between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022 in a large healthcare system (3507 pregnancies [3454 individuals]) who self-reported prenatal cannabis use and mode of use (smoke, vape, edibles, dabs, and topicals) during universal screening at entrance to prenatal care. Multivariable regression models examined the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and modes of use.
Results
Smoking was the most common mode (71.1 %), followed by edibles (32.6 %), vaping (22.2 %), dabs (9.9 %), and topicals (4.6 %); 29.9 % endorsed multiple modes. Those who used edibles were the least likely to use daily (28.2 %), while those who dabbed (54.3 %) or used > 1 mode (45.3 %) were the most likely to use daily. In multivariable models, smoking was generally more common and edibles less common among those who were younger, non-Hispanic Black, and living in more deprived neighborhoods, vaping was more common among Hispanic individuals and less common among non-Hispanic Black individuals and those living in more deprived neighborhoods, and dabbing was more common among those who were younger and Hispanic.
Conclusion
Modes of cannabis use during early pregnancy varied by sociodemographic characteristics. Future research is needed to test whether the risks of adverse outcomes or likelihood of persistent use during pregnancy vary depending on how cannabis is administered during pregnancy.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.