影响因子:实际影响信息和感知捐赠效能对捐赠者重复捐赠的影响

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Experimental Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104720
Liat Levontin , Zohar Gilad , Elizabeth Durango-Cohen , Pablo Durango-Cohen
{"title":"影响因子:实际影响信息和感知捐赠效能对捐赠者重复捐赠的影响","authors":"Liat Levontin ,&nbsp;Zohar Gilad ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Durango-Cohen ,&nbsp;Pablo Durango-Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examined the utility of providing people with information about the actual impact of their donations. Results of a field survey (<em>N</em> = 1062) and three controlled experiments (<em>N</em> = 881) reveal the importance of actual impact information in promoting repeated donations and retaining repeated donors. Exposing participants to information about the actual impact of their donations—compared with exposing participants to anticipated impact information or no information—increased their perceived donation efficacy, which increased their willingness to give a repeated donation, as well as their repeated donation amounts. Notably, donors exposed to actual impact information tended to retain their contribution amounts, whereas donors in other conditions decreased their contribution amounts. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 104720"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact factor: The effect of actual impact information and perceived donation efficacy on donors' repeated donations\",\"authors\":\"Liat Levontin ,&nbsp;Zohar Gilad ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Durango-Cohen ,&nbsp;Pablo Durango-Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This research examined the utility of providing people with information about the actual impact of their donations. Results of a field survey (<em>N</em> = 1062) and three controlled experiments (<em>N</em> = 881) reveal the importance of actual impact information in promoting repeated donations and retaining repeated donors. Exposing participants to information about the actual impact of their donations—compared with exposing participants to anticipated impact information or no information—increased their perceived donation efficacy, which increased their willingness to give a repeated donation, as well as their repeated donation amounts. Notably, donors exposed to actual impact information tended to retain their contribution amounts, whereas donors in other conditions decreased their contribution amounts. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000010\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000010","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究考察了向人们提供有关其捐款实际影响的信息的效用。一项实地调查(N = 1062)和三项对照实验(N = 881)的结果揭示了实际影响信息在促进重复捐赠和留住重复捐赠者方面的重要性。让参与者了解他们捐赠的实际影响的信息,与让参与者了解预期影响的信息或没有信息相比,增加了他们的感知捐赠效率,这增加了他们重复捐赠的意愿,以及他们重复捐赠的数量。值得注意的是,获得实际影响信息的捐助国倾向于保留其捐款数额,而在其他情况下的捐助国则减少其捐款数额。我们讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact factor: The effect of actual impact information and perceived donation efficacy on donors' repeated donations
This research examined the utility of providing people with information about the actual impact of their donations. Results of a field survey (N = 1062) and three controlled experiments (N = 881) reveal the importance of actual impact information in promoting repeated donations and retaining repeated donors. Exposing participants to information about the actual impact of their donations—compared with exposing participants to anticipated impact information or no information—increased their perceived donation efficacy, which increased their willingness to give a repeated donation, as well as their repeated donation amounts. Notably, donors exposed to actual impact information tended to retain their contribution amounts, whereas donors in other conditions decreased their contribution amounts. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
期刊最新文献
The role of racial shared reality in Black Americans' identity-safety during interracial interactions The kernel of truth in gender stereotypes: Consider the avocado, not the apple Joint collective action increases support for social change and mitigates intergroup polarisation: A registered report More likely or more wrong? - Disentangling the prototype effect of discrimination perception Do we really think our politicians should be intellectually humble?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1