Salameh S Obeidat, Aiman Suleiman, Elena Ahrens, Matthew J Needham, Catriona Stewart, Mitra Khany, Tim M Tartler, Liana Zucco, Jaideep J Pandit, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran
{"title":"i-gel对术中气道相关安全事件的实际评价:来自新英格兰医院网络的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Salameh S Obeidat, Aiman Suleiman, Elena Ahrens, Matthew J Needham, Catriona Stewart, Mitra Khany, Tim M Tartler, Liana Zucco, Jaideep J Pandit, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":"140 2","pages":"253-261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Evaluation of i-gel Introduction on Intraoperative Airway-Related Safety Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Hospital Network.\",\"authors\":\"Salameh S Obeidat, Aiman Suleiman, Elena Ahrens, Matthew J Needham, Catriona Stewart, Mitra Khany, Tim M Tartler, Liana Zucco, Jaideep J Pandit, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":\"140 2\",\"pages\":\"253-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-World Evaluation of i-gel Introduction on Intraoperative Airway-Related Safety Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Hospital Network.
Background: Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.
Methods: Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis.
Results: A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002).
Conclusions: We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.
期刊介绍:
Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.