i-gel对术中气道相关安全事件的实际评价:来自新英格兰医院网络的回顾性队列研究

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043
Salameh S Obeidat, Aiman Suleiman, Elena Ahrens, Matthew J Needham, Catriona Stewart, Mitra Khany, Tim M Tartler, Liana Zucco, Jaideep J Pandit, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran
{"title":"i-gel对术中气道相关安全事件的实际评价:来自新英格兰医院网络的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Salameh S Obeidat, Aiman Suleiman, Elena Ahrens, Matthew J Needham, Catriona Stewart, Mitra Khany, Tim M Tartler, Liana Zucco, Jaideep J Pandit, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":"140 2","pages":"253-261"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-World Evaluation of i-gel Introduction on Intraoperative Airway-Related Safety Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Hospital Network.\",\"authors\":\"Salameh S Obeidat, Aiman Suleiman, Elena Ahrens, Matthew J Needham, Catriona Stewart, Mitra Khany, Tim M Tartler, Liana Zucco, Jaideep J Pandit, Maximilian S Schaefer, Satya Krishna Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":\"140 2\",\"pages\":\"253-261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一些卫生保健网络已经完全采用第二代声门上气道(SGA) i-凝胶。缺乏在这种做法改变后提高患者安全的实际证据。我们假设,与之前的LMA®-Unique™相比,i-gel的实施将降低航空相关安全事件的风险。方法:纳入2013年1月至2020年6月在学术医疗网络接受LMA-Unique或i-gel全身麻醉的成年患者。我们评估了i-gel实施对术中气道相关安全事件趋势的影响,这是一种呼吸障碍的复合结局,包括术中去饱和(50 mm Hg)、高驾驶压力(bbb30 cmH2O)、低潮气量(结果:共纳入21,417例患者,5193例患者经历了气道相关安全事件(24.2%)。在2018年1月更广泛地使用i-gel后,与LMA-Unique期间(每月-0.2%,95% CI, -0.1%至-0.4%,P < .001)相比,航空相关安全事件的月度趋势下降幅度扩大至每月-0.3% (95% CI, -0.1%至-0.3%;P = .002)。结论:我们发现,在我们的医疗网络中全面实施i-gel后,航空相关安全事件的月度趋势显著下降。这项研究为临床医生和决策者提供了真实世界的患者安全性和临床有效性信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-World Evaluation of i-gel Introduction on Intraoperative Airway-Related Safety Events: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a New England Hospital Network.

Background: Several health care networks have fully adopted second-generation supraglottic airway (SGA) i-gel. Real-world evidence of enhanced patient safety after such practice change is lacking. We hypothesized that the implementation of i-gel compared to the previous LMA®-Unique™ would be associated with a lower risk of airway-related safety events.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing general anesthesia with LMA-Unique or i-gel between January 2013 and June 2020 at an academic health care network were included. We assessed the influence of i-gel implementation on the trends of intraoperative airway-related safety events, a composite outcome of respiratory disturbances including intraoperative desaturation (<90%), hypo- or hypercapnia (<25 or >50 mm Hg), high driving pressures (>30 cmH2O), low tidal volumes (<4 mL/kg), multiple attempts of SGA placement, or emergency replacement with a tracheal tube, using adjusted ordinary least-squares regression interrupted time series analysis.

Results: A total of 21,417 patients were included, and 5193 experienced airway-related safety events (24.2%). After the wider uptake of i-gel in January 2018, the reduction in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events was magnified to -0.3% per month (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1% to -0.4%, P < .001), compared to the LMA-Unique period (-0.2% per month, 95% CI, -0.1% to -0.3%; P = .002).

Conclusions: We found a significant decline in the monthly trend of airway-related safety events after the full implementation of i-gel in our health care network. This study provides real-world patient safety and clinical effectiveness information to clinicians and decision-makers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic Management of Parturients With Achondroplasia During Labor and Delivery: A Narrative Review. Association of Intraoperative Occult Hypoxemia With 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality. Fibrinogen Replacement in Neonatal Cardiac Surgery: Methodological Challenges. Examining the Impact of High-Decibel Environment on Anesthesiologists' Crisis Situation Management. Fibrinogen Dose Variability in Cardiac Surgery Patients Who Required Cryoprecipitate Replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1