故意离体注射臂丛神经根后神经束内扩散的风险。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.030
Xavier Sala-Blanch, André P Boezaart, Graeme A McLeod, Miguel A Reina
{"title":"故意离体注射臂丛神经根后神经束内扩散的风险。","authors":"Xavier Sala-Blanch, André P Boezaart, Graeme A McLeod, Miguel A Reina","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the intraneural spread of injected fluid in brachial plexus nerve roots, examining the potential for intrafascicular spread and identifying influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve deliberate ultrasound-guided intraneural injections were performed at the ventral rami of the brachial plexus nerve roots at their exits from the neuroforamina in six fresh, unembalmed, cryopreserved human cadavers. A 22-G, 30-degree bevel echogenic regional anaesthesia needle was used. Each injection contained 1 ml of heparinised erythrocytes as a marker. Nerve swelling observed on ultrasound images confirmed intraneural injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraneural spread was observed in 12 ventral rami of the six brachial plexi: C5 (1), C6 (3), C7 (5), C8 (2), and T1 (1). Among these, intrafascicular spread was detected in eight cases, six in monofascicular roots and two in bifascicular roots, though none in roots with three or more fascicles. The fascicle diameters in these cases (2.1-3.8 mm) were at least twice the diameter of the needle orifice, measured at 0.9 mm, which was entirely inside the fascicles. In the four cases with intraneural but without intrafascicular spread, the fascicle diameters were about two times the diameter of the needle orifice in three instances, but the entire needle orifice was not always inside a fascicle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast with multifascicular peripheral nerves, intrafascicular spread was possible after deliberate intraneural injections near the neuroforaminal canal exit of the brachial plexus nerve roots in several monofascicular or bifascicular ventral rami if the fascicle diameter was more than twice the needle opening length and the entire opening was inside the fascicle.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of intrafascicular spread after deliberate ex vivo intraneural injections of brachial plexus nerve roots.\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Sala-Blanch, André P Boezaart, Graeme A McLeod, Miguel A Reina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We investigated the intraneural spread of injected fluid in brachial plexus nerve roots, examining the potential for intrafascicular spread and identifying influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve deliberate ultrasound-guided intraneural injections were performed at the ventral rami of the brachial plexus nerve roots at their exits from the neuroforamina in six fresh, unembalmed, cryopreserved human cadavers. A 22-G, 30-degree bevel echogenic regional anaesthesia needle was used. Each injection contained 1 ml of heparinised erythrocytes as a marker. Nerve swelling observed on ultrasound images confirmed intraneural injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraneural spread was observed in 12 ventral rami of the six brachial plexi: C5 (1), C6 (3), C7 (5), C8 (2), and T1 (1). Among these, intrafascicular spread was detected in eight cases, six in monofascicular roots and two in bifascicular roots, though none in roots with three or more fascicles. The fascicle diameters in these cases (2.1-3.8 mm) were at least twice the diameter of the needle orifice, measured at 0.9 mm, which was entirely inside the fascicles. In the four cases with intraneural but without intrafascicular spread, the fascicle diameters were about two times the diameter of the needle orifice in three instances, but the entire needle orifice was not always inside a fascicle.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast with multifascicular peripheral nerves, intrafascicular spread was possible after deliberate intraneural injections near the neuroforaminal canal exit of the brachial plexus nerve roots in several monofascicular or bifascicular ventral rami if the fascicle diameter was more than twice the needle opening length and the entire opening was inside the fascicle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.11.030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们研究了注入液体在臂丛神经根的神经内扩散,探讨了神经束内扩散的可能性并确定了影响因素。方法:对6具新鲜、未防腐、冷冻保存的人尸体,在神经孔出口的臂丛神经根腹支处进行12次超声引导下的神经内注射。使用22-G, 30度斜面回声区域麻醉针。每次注射含有1ml肝素化红细胞作为标记物。超声图像显示神经肿胀,证实神经内注射。结果:在6个臂丛的12根腹侧支:C5(1)、C6(3)、C7(5)、C8(2)、T1(1)中发现神经内扩散。其中,束内扩散8例,单束根6例,双束根2例,3束及以上的根未发现。这些病例的针束直径(2.1-3.8 mm)至少是针孔直径(0.9 mm)的两倍,针孔完全在针束内。在4例神经内扩散但无束内扩散的病例中,有3例束壁直径约为针孔直径的2倍,但整个针孔并不总是在束壁内。结论:与多束周围神经相比,在几个单束或双束腹支神经束直径大于针孔长度的两倍且整个针孔在束内的情况下,在靠近神经间孔管出口的臂丛神经根处进行神经内注射后,有可能发生束内扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of intrafascicular spread after deliberate ex vivo intraneural injections of brachial plexus nerve roots.

Background: We investigated the intraneural spread of injected fluid in brachial plexus nerve roots, examining the potential for intrafascicular spread and identifying influencing factors.

Methods: Twelve deliberate ultrasound-guided intraneural injections were performed at the ventral rami of the brachial plexus nerve roots at their exits from the neuroforamina in six fresh, unembalmed, cryopreserved human cadavers. A 22-G, 30-degree bevel echogenic regional anaesthesia needle was used. Each injection contained 1 ml of heparinised erythrocytes as a marker. Nerve swelling observed on ultrasound images confirmed intraneural injection.

Results: Intraneural spread was observed in 12 ventral rami of the six brachial plexi: C5 (1), C6 (3), C7 (5), C8 (2), and T1 (1). Among these, intrafascicular spread was detected in eight cases, six in monofascicular roots and two in bifascicular roots, though none in roots with three or more fascicles. The fascicle diameters in these cases (2.1-3.8 mm) were at least twice the diameter of the needle orifice, measured at 0.9 mm, which was entirely inside the fascicles. In the four cases with intraneural but without intrafascicular spread, the fascicle diameters were about two times the diameter of the needle orifice in three instances, but the entire needle orifice was not always inside a fascicle.

Conclusions: In contrast with multifascicular peripheral nerves, intrafascicular spread was possible after deliberate intraneural injections near the neuroforaminal canal exit of the brachial plexus nerve roots in several monofascicular or bifascicular ventral rami if the fascicle diameter was more than twice the needle opening length and the entire opening was inside the fascicle.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
The number of central nervous system-driven symptoms predicts subsequent chronic primary pain: evidence from UK Biobank. The debate rages on: physician-assisted suicide in an ethical light. Response to Br J Anaesth 2024; 133: 1352-3. Two-person verbal check to confirm tracheal intubation: evaluation of practice changes to prevent unrecognised oesophageal intubation. Clinical team flow in the perioperative environment: a qualitative single-centre study. Continuous serratus anterior block for sternotomy analgesia after cardiac surgery: a single-centre feasibility study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1