eus引导下细针活检与细针穿刺对1型自身免疫性胰腺炎的组织病理学证据:中国的一项单中心回顾性研究

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000095
Yuyan Zhou, Liqi Sun, Xinyue Wang, Dongling Wan, Jiaheng Xu, Mengruo Jiang, Yue Liu, Chao Liu, Yatao Tu, Haojie Huang, Zhendong Jin
{"title":"eus引导下细针活检与细针穿刺对1型自身免疫性胰腺炎的组织病理学证据:中国的一项单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Yuyan Zhou, Liqi Sun, Xinyue Wang, Dongling Wan, Jiaheng Xu, Mengruo Jiang, Yue Liu, Chao Liu, Yatao Tu, Haojie Huang, Zhendong Jin","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>EUS is recommended for guiding pancreatic tissue acquisition in suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) cases. However, there is a lack of comparative research on the effectiveness between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing AIP in China. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) specifically for type 1 AIP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2010 and 2023, individuals with AIP who received EUS-TA at Changhai Hospital were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients diagnosed with AIP who underwent EUS-TA were included in the final analysis. Of these, 104 patients (60.1%) received EUS-FNA, and 69 patients (39.9%) underwent EUS-FNB. Sufficient pancreatic tissue samples (>5 cells/high-power field) were obtained in 164 of 173 patients (94.8%), with success rates of 94.2% for EUS-FNA and 95.7% for EUS-FNB (<i>P ></i> 0.05). EUS-FNB exhibited higher rates of reliable level 1 histopathological findings (40.9% <i>vs.</i> 16.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and reliable level 2 histopathological findings (33.3% <i>vs</i>. 12.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with EUS-FNA. Furthermore, a higher occurrence of IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration (>10 cells/high-power field) was observed with EUS-FNB compared with EUS-FNA (74.2% <i>vs</i>. 27.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The multivariate logistic analysis also revealed that EUS-FNA was less effective in obtaining reliable evidence compared with EUS-FNB, as evident in both level 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.002; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.56) and level 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.001; odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.49) histopathological evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-FNB demonstrates higher rates of level 1 and level 2 histopathological findings, as well as more abundant IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration, compared with EUS-FNA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"13 6","pages":"351-360"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy <i>versus</i> fine-needle aspiration for histopathological evidence for type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: A single-center retrospective study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Yuyan Zhou, Liqi Sun, Xinyue Wang, Dongling Wan, Jiaheng Xu, Mengruo Jiang, Yue Liu, Chao Liu, Yatao Tu, Haojie Huang, Zhendong Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/eus.0000000000000095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>EUS is recommended for guiding pancreatic tissue acquisition in suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) cases. However, there is a lack of comparative research on the effectiveness between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing AIP in China. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) specifically for type 1 AIP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2010 and 2023, individuals with AIP who received EUS-TA at Changhai Hospital were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 173 patients diagnosed with AIP who underwent EUS-TA were included in the final analysis. Of these, 104 patients (60.1%) received EUS-FNA, and 69 patients (39.9%) underwent EUS-FNB. Sufficient pancreatic tissue samples (>5 cells/high-power field) were obtained in 164 of 173 patients (94.8%), with success rates of 94.2% for EUS-FNA and 95.7% for EUS-FNB (<i>P ></i> 0.05). EUS-FNB exhibited higher rates of reliable level 1 histopathological findings (40.9% <i>vs.</i> 16.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and reliable level 2 histopathological findings (33.3% <i>vs</i>. 12.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with EUS-FNA. Furthermore, a higher occurrence of IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration (>10 cells/high-power field) was observed with EUS-FNB compared with EUS-FNA (74.2% <i>vs</i>. 27.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The multivariate logistic analysis also revealed that EUS-FNA was less effective in obtaining reliable evidence compared with EUS-FNB, as evident in both level 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.002; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.56) and level 1 (<i>P</i> = 0.001; odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.49) histopathological evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-FNB demonstrates higher rates of level 1 and level 2 histopathological findings, as well as more abundant IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration, compared with EUS-FNA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"351-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11723699/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endoscopic Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000095\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:EUS被推荐用于指导疑似自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)病例的胰腺组织获取。然而,国内缺乏eus引导下细针穿刺(EUS-FNA)与eus引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)诊断AIP的有效性对比研究。本研究旨在评估eus引导下的组织采集(EUS-TA)对1型AIP的诊断准确性。方法:选取2010 - 2023年在长海医院接受EUS-TA治疗的AIP患者为研究对象。结果:173例诊断为AIP并行EUS-TA的患者被纳入最终分析。其中,104例患者(60.1%)接受了EUS-FNA, 69例患者(39.9%)接受了EUS-FNB。173例患者中有164例(94.8%)获得了足够的胰腺组织样本(bb50个细胞/高倍视野),EUS-FNA和EUS-FNB的成功率分别为94.2%和95.7% (P > 0.05)。与EUS-FNA相比,EUS-FNB具有更高的可靠的1级组织病理学发现率(40.9%比16.3%,P < 0.001)和可靠的2级组织病理学发现率(33.3%比12.2%,P < 0.001)。此外,与EUS-FNA相比,EUS-FNB观察到igg4阳性浆细胞浸润的发生率更高(bbb10个细胞/高倍视野)(74.2%比27.9%,P < 0.001)。多因素logistic分析还显示,与EUS-FNB相比,EUS-FNA在获得可靠证据方面的效果更差,在2级(P = 0.002;优势比0.21;95%置信区间,0.08-0.56)和水平1 (P = 0.001;优势比0.19;95%可信区间,0.08-0.49)组织病理学证据。结论:与EUS-FNA相比,EUS-FNB具有更高的1级和2级病理组织学表现,且igg4阳性浆细胞浸润更丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for histopathological evidence for type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: A single-center retrospective study in China.

Background and objectives: EUS is recommended for guiding pancreatic tissue acquisition in suspected autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) cases. However, there is a lack of comparative research on the effectiveness between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing AIP in China. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) specifically for type 1 AIP.

Methods: Between 2010 and 2023, individuals with AIP who received EUS-TA at Changhai Hospital were included in the study.

Results: A total of 173 patients diagnosed with AIP who underwent EUS-TA were included in the final analysis. Of these, 104 patients (60.1%) received EUS-FNA, and 69 patients (39.9%) underwent EUS-FNB. Sufficient pancreatic tissue samples (>5 cells/high-power field) were obtained in 164 of 173 patients (94.8%), with success rates of 94.2% for EUS-FNA and 95.7% for EUS-FNB (P > 0.05). EUS-FNB exhibited higher rates of reliable level 1 histopathological findings (40.9% vs. 16.3%, P < 0.001) and reliable level 2 histopathological findings (33.3% vs. 12.2%, P < 0.001) compared with EUS-FNA. Furthermore, a higher occurrence of IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration (>10 cells/high-power field) was observed with EUS-FNB compared with EUS-FNA (74.2% vs. 27.9%, P < 0.001). The multivariate logistic analysis also revealed that EUS-FNA was less effective in obtaining reliable evidence compared with EUS-FNB, as evident in both level 2 (P = 0.002; odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.56) and level 1 (P = 0.001; odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.49) histopathological evidence.

Conclusions: EUS-FNB demonstrates higher rates of level 1 and level 2 histopathological findings, as well as more abundant IgG4-positive plasma cell infiltration, compared with EUS-FNA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic efficacy of cytologic smear and pathologic histology in the differential diagnosis of distal biliary stricture via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. A suspected case of hepatic reactive lymphoid hyperplasia in which EUS-fine needle aspiration contributed to the diagnosis. Adequacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for next-generation sequencing in pancreatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A prospective comparative trial to determine the optimal number of EUS-guided fineneedle passes for successful organoid creation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Deep learning segmentation architectures for automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy samples based on whole-slide imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1