Ashish Manne, Fode Tounkara, Eric Min, Paul Samuel, Katherine Benson, Anne M Noonan, Arjun Mittra, John Hays, Sameek Roychowdhury, Pannaga Malalur, Shafia Rahman, Ning Jin, Kenneth Pitter, Eric Miller, Alexandra Diaz, Kai He
{"title":"预测免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期上消化道癌症预后的危险因素","authors":"Ashish Manne, Fode Tounkara, Eric Min, Paul Samuel, Katherine Benson, Anne M Noonan, Arjun Mittra, John Hays, Sameek Roychowdhury, Pannaga Malalur, Shafia Rahman, Ning Jin, Kenneth Pitter, Eric Miller, Alexandra Diaz, Kai He","doi":"10.14740/gr1768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved to the frontline in recent years to manage upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tumors, such as esophageal and gastric cancers. This retrospective review sheds light on real-world data on ICI-treated UGI tumors to identify risk factors (clinical and pathological) impacting the outcome other than traditional biomarkers (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or microsatellite instability status).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with UGI tumors who received at least one dose of ICI for stage IV or recurrent disease between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2021, at The Ohio State University were included in the study. The patients' baseline characteristics, labs, and blood counts (even at disease progression) were extracted with survival outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)). Descriptive statistics, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model for survival outcomes, Fisher exact test for categorical variables, were conducted using JMP Pro 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had 64 patients (84% males) included in the study, with the racial distribution as follows: 88% Caucasian, 5% African American, 1% Asian, and 6% from other racial groups. Men and the use of ICI in third lines or more had a positive impact on PFS and OS. For OS, 1) history of surgery positively impacted the outcome, while bone metastases worsened it; 2) baseline red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) negatively impacted the OS. For PFS, 1) PD-L1 positivity, baseline lymphocyte count, and aspartate transferase levels had a positive impact; 2) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity, baseline RBC, TSH, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine transferase (AST) levels had a negative impact. A slight increase in white blood cell (WBC) count (by 1.54, P = 0.02) and a drop in lymphocyte count (by 0.1907, P = 0.003) was significantly associated with disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline risk factors and monitoring blood counts can help predict outcomes in ICI-treated UGI tumors. We need larger studies to confirm this.</p>","PeriodicalId":12461,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Research","volume":"17 5-6","pages":"195-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors Predicting Outcomes in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Ashish Manne, Fode Tounkara, Eric Min, Paul Samuel, Katherine Benson, Anne M Noonan, Arjun Mittra, John Hays, Sameek Roychowdhury, Pannaga Malalur, Shafia Rahman, Ning Jin, Kenneth Pitter, Eric Miller, Alexandra Diaz, Kai He\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/gr1768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved to the frontline in recent years to manage upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tumors, such as esophageal and gastric cancers. This retrospective review sheds light on real-world data on ICI-treated UGI tumors to identify risk factors (clinical and pathological) impacting the outcome other than traditional biomarkers (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or microsatellite instability status).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with UGI tumors who received at least one dose of ICI for stage IV or recurrent disease between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2021, at The Ohio State University were included in the study. The patients' baseline characteristics, labs, and blood counts (even at disease progression) were extracted with survival outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)). Descriptive statistics, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model for survival outcomes, Fisher exact test for categorical variables, were conducted using JMP Pro 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had 64 patients (84% males) included in the study, with the racial distribution as follows: 88% Caucasian, 5% African American, 1% Asian, and 6% from other racial groups. Men and the use of ICI in third lines or more had a positive impact on PFS and OS. For OS, 1) history of surgery positively impacted the outcome, while bone metastases worsened it; 2) baseline red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) negatively impacted the OS. For PFS, 1) PD-L1 positivity, baseline lymphocyte count, and aspartate transferase levels had a positive impact; 2) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity, baseline RBC, TSH, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine transferase (AST) levels had a negative impact. A slight increase in white blood cell (WBC) count (by 1.54, P = 0.02) and a drop in lymphocyte count (by 0.1907, P = 0.003) was significantly associated with disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Baseline risk factors and monitoring blood counts can help predict outcomes in ICI-treated UGI tumors. We need larger studies to confirm this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"volume\":\"17 5-6\",\"pages\":\"195-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11711034/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastroenterology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:近年来,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)已成为治疗食管癌和胃癌等上消化道(UGI)肿瘤的前沿药物。这篇回顾性综述揭示了ICI治疗上消化道肿瘤的真实世界数据,以确定除传统生物标记物(程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)或微卫星不稳定性状态)外影响治疗结果的风险因素(临床和病理):研究纳入了2015年1月1日至2021年7月31日期间在俄亥俄州立大学至少接受过一次ICI治疗的IV期或复发性UGI肿瘤患者。研究人员提取了患者的基线特征、实验室检查和血细胞计数(即使在疾病进展时)以及生存结果(无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS))。使用 JMP Pro 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC)对生存结果进行描述性统计、对数秩检验和 Cox 比例危险模型,对分类变量进行费舍尔精确检验:本研究共纳入 64 名患者(84% 为男性),种族分布如下:88% 为白种人,5% 为男性:88%为白种人,5%为非裔美国人,1%为亚裔,6%为其他种族。男性和在三线或三线以上使用 ICI 对 PFS 和 OS 有积极影响。就OS而言,1)手术史对结果有积极影响,而骨转移则使结果恶化;2)基线红细胞计数(RBC)、血红蛋白和促甲状腺激素(TSH)对OS有消极影响。对于PFS,1)PD-L1阳性、基线淋巴细胞计数和天冬氨酸转氨酶水平有积极影响;2)人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性、基线红细胞计数、TSH、碱性磷酸酶和丙氨酸转氨酶(AST)水平有消极影响。白细胞(WBC)计数的轻微增加(增加 1.54,P = 0.02)和淋巴细胞计数的减少(减少 0.1907,P = 0.003)与疾病进展显著相关:结论:基线风险因素和监测血细胞计数有助于预测接受 ICI 治疗的 UGI 肿瘤的预后。我们需要更大规模的研究来证实这一点。
Risk Factors Predicting Outcomes in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved to the frontline in recent years to manage upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tumors, such as esophageal and gastric cancers. This retrospective review sheds light on real-world data on ICI-treated UGI tumors to identify risk factors (clinical and pathological) impacting the outcome other than traditional biomarkers (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or microsatellite instability status).
Methods: Patients with UGI tumors who received at least one dose of ICI for stage IV or recurrent disease between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2021, at The Ohio State University were included in the study. The patients' baseline characteristics, labs, and blood counts (even at disease progression) were extracted with survival outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)). Descriptive statistics, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model for survival outcomes, Fisher exact test for categorical variables, were conducted using JMP Pro 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results: We had 64 patients (84% males) included in the study, with the racial distribution as follows: 88% Caucasian, 5% African American, 1% Asian, and 6% from other racial groups. Men and the use of ICI in third lines or more had a positive impact on PFS and OS. For OS, 1) history of surgery positively impacted the outcome, while bone metastases worsened it; 2) baseline red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) negatively impacted the OS. For PFS, 1) PD-L1 positivity, baseline lymphocyte count, and aspartate transferase levels had a positive impact; 2) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity, baseline RBC, TSH, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine transferase (AST) levels had a negative impact. A slight increase in white blood cell (WBC) count (by 1.54, P = 0.02) and a drop in lymphocyte count (by 0.1907, P = 0.003) was significantly associated with disease progression.
Conclusions: Baseline risk factors and monitoring blood counts can help predict outcomes in ICI-treated UGI tumors. We need larger studies to confirm this.