无规范参考数据库的人工智能单受试者形态测量的临床验证。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1177/13872877241304607
Dennis M Hedderich, Roland Opfer, Julia Krüger, Lothar Spies, Igor Yakushev, Ralph Buchert
{"title":"无规范参考数据库的人工智能单受试者形态测量的临床验证。","authors":"Dennis M Hedderich, Roland Opfer, Julia Krüger, Lothar Spies, Igor Yakushev, Ralph Buchert","doi":"10.1177/13872877241304607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-subject voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a powerful technique for reader-independent detection of brain atrophy in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to support the (differential) diagnosis and staging of neurodegenerative diseases in individual patients. However, VBM is sensitive to the MRI scanner platform and details of the acquisition sequence. To mitigate this limitation, we recently proposed and <i>technically</i> validated a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based VBM which does not rely on a normative reference database.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical validation of CNN-based VBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CNN-based VBM was compared with conventional VBM based on a mixed-scanner normative database in 227 consecutive patients (66.0 ± 9.6 years, 53.3% female) with suspected dementing neurodegenerative disease. VBM maps were interpreted visually by two experienced readers, first with respect to the presence of any neurodegenerative disease, then for the differentiation between Alzheimer's disease (AD)-typical and non-AD atrophy patterns. A Likert 6-score was used for both tasks. Simultaneously acquired positron emission tomography (PET) with <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) served as reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant impact of the VBM method on the visual detection of any neurodegenerative disease (p < 0.001). Balanced accuracy/sensitivity/specificity were 80.4/86.3/74.5% for CNN-based VBM versus 75.7/79.5/71.8% for conventional VBM. Differentiation between AD and non-AD typical atrophy patterns did not differ between both VBM methods (p = 0.871).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CNN-based VBM provides clinically useful accuracy for the detection of neurodegeneration-suspect atrophy with higher sensitivity than conventional VBM with a mixed-scanner normative reference database and without compromising specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877241304607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of artificial intelligence-based single-subject morphometry without normative reference database.\",\"authors\":\"Dennis M Hedderich, Roland Opfer, Julia Krüger, Lothar Spies, Igor Yakushev, Ralph Buchert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877241304607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-subject voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a powerful technique for reader-independent detection of brain atrophy in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to support the (differential) diagnosis and staging of neurodegenerative diseases in individual patients. However, VBM is sensitive to the MRI scanner platform and details of the acquisition sequence. To mitigate this limitation, we recently proposed and <i>technically</i> validated a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based VBM which does not rely on a normative reference database.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinical validation of CNN-based VBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CNN-based VBM was compared with conventional VBM based on a mixed-scanner normative database in 227 consecutive patients (66.0 ± 9.6 years, 53.3% female) with suspected dementing neurodegenerative disease. VBM maps were interpreted visually by two experienced readers, first with respect to the presence of any neurodegenerative disease, then for the differentiation between Alzheimer's disease (AD)-typical and non-AD atrophy patterns. A Likert 6-score was used for both tasks. Simultaneously acquired positron emission tomography (PET) with <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) served as reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant impact of the VBM method on the visual detection of any neurodegenerative disease (p < 0.001). Balanced accuracy/sensitivity/specificity were 80.4/86.3/74.5% for CNN-based VBM versus 75.7/79.5/71.8% for conventional VBM. Differentiation between AD and non-AD typical atrophy patterns did not differ between both VBM methods (p = 0.871).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CNN-based VBM provides clinically useful accuracy for the detection of neurodegeneration-suspect atrophy with higher sensitivity than conventional VBM with a mixed-scanner normative reference database and without compromising specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877241304607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241304607\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877241304607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于单受试者体素的形态测量(VBM)是一种强大的技术,可以在结构磁共振成像(MRI)中独立于阅读器检测脑萎缩,以支持个体患者神经退行性疾病的(鉴别)诊断和分期。然而,VBM对MRI扫描仪平台和采集序列的细节很敏感。为了减轻这一限制,我们最近提出并在技术上验证了一种基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的VBM,它不依赖于规范的参考数据库。目的:基于cnn的VBM的临床验证。方法:对227例疑似痴呆性神经退行性疾病患者(66.0±9.6岁,53.3%女性),采用基于cnn的VBM与基于混合扫描仪规范数据库的常规VBM进行比较。VBM图由两位经验丰富的读者进行视觉解释,首先是关于任何神经退行性疾病的存在,然后是阿尔茨海默病(AD)典型和非AD萎缩模式的区分。两项任务都使用李克特6分。同时获得正电子发射断层扫描(PET),以18f -氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)为参比标准。结果:重复测量方差分析显示VBM方法对任何神经退行性疾病的视觉检测有显著影响(p结论:基于cnn的VBM在检测神经退行性可疑萎缩方面具有临床有用的准确性,其灵敏度高于混合扫描仪规范参考数据库的传统VBM,且不影响特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical validation of artificial intelligence-based single-subject morphometry without normative reference database.

Background: Single-subject voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a powerful technique for reader-independent detection of brain atrophy in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to support the (differential) diagnosis and staging of neurodegenerative diseases in individual patients. However, VBM is sensitive to the MRI scanner platform and details of the acquisition sequence. To mitigate this limitation, we recently proposed and technically validated a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based VBM which does not rely on a normative reference database.

Objective: Clinical validation of CNN-based VBM.

Methods: CNN-based VBM was compared with conventional VBM based on a mixed-scanner normative database in 227 consecutive patients (66.0 ± 9.6 years, 53.3% female) with suspected dementing neurodegenerative disease. VBM maps were interpreted visually by two experienced readers, first with respect to the presence of any neurodegenerative disease, then for the differentiation between Alzheimer's disease (AD)-typical and non-AD atrophy patterns. A Likert 6-score was used for both tasks. Simultaneously acquired positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) served as reference standard.

Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant impact of the VBM method on the visual detection of any neurodegenerative disease (p < 0.001). Balanced accuracy/sensitivity/specificity were 80.4/86.3/74.5% for CNN-based VBM versus 75.7/79.5/71.8% for conventional VBM. Differentiation between AD and non-AD typical atrophy patterns did not differ between both VBM methods (p = 0.871).

Conclusions: CNN-based VBM provides clinically useful accuracy for the detection of neurodegeneration-suspect atrophy with higher sensitivity than conventional VBM with a mixed-scanner normative reference database and without compromising specificity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Di Huang Yi Zhi Fang improves cognitive function in APP/PS1 mice by inducing neuronal mitochondrial autophagy through the PINK1-parkin pathway. The use of outpatient support services: Differences between people with mild cognitive impairment and people with mild to moderate dementia. Dancing towards speech improvement: Repurposing dance for motor speech deficits in neurodegenerative diseases. Cognivue Clarity® characterizes amyloid status and preclinical Alzheimer's disease in biomarker confirmed cohorts in the Bio-Hermes Study. Diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease using a fully automated platform: A real-world clinical study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1