减少社区老年人孤独感的干预措施:网络荟萃分析和系统评价。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105441
Yinghui Sun MD , Haiyou Huang BM , Guangyun Cai MD , Jing Gu PhD , Gordon K.L. Leung MD , Yanxiao Gao PhD , Samuel Y.S. Wong PhD , Eliza L.Y. Wong PhD , Winnie W.S. Mak PhD , Timothy Kwok PhD , Phoenix K.H. Mo PhD
{"title":"减少社区老年人孤独感的干预措施:网络荟萃分析和系统评价。","authors":"Yinghui Sun MD ,&nbsp;Haiyou Huang BM ,&nbsp;Guangyun Cai MD ,&nbsp;Jing Gu PhD ,&nbsp;Gordon K.L. Leung MD ,&nbsp;Yanxiao Gao PhD ,&nbsp;Samuel Y.S. Wong PhD ,&nbsp;Eliza L.Y. Wong PhD ,&nbsp;Winnie W.S. Mak PhD ,&nbsp;Timothy Kwok PhD ,&nbsp;Phoenix K.H. Mo PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in reducing loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Interventional studies were included if they contained original quantitative data on interventions to reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults. Qualitative studies were included if they contained views on loneliness coping strategies or intervention evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six English databases and 3 Chinese databases were searched for studies published before August 2023. We extracted mean and standard deviation for the NMA to examine the overall effectiveness and efficacy of different interventions on loneliness. Thematic analysis was used to derive perspectives on coping strategies to mitigate loneliness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-six quantitative studies with 6049 participants and 40 qualitative studies with 1095 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled effect size was large and significant [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.95; 95% CI, −1.32 to −0.58; <em>P</em> &lt; .001], indicating a strong effect of interventions in reducing loneliness. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in effect sizes by study region and health risk. Results of the NMA suggested interventions seem to be most effective when having psychosocial interventions as the content, a combination of individual and group as the delivery mode, and a mixture of face-to-face and online methods as the contact mode. Findings of the qualitative synthesis revealed 2 main dimensions of activities for reducing loneliness, including delivery modes (individual or group or combination) and settings (indoor or outdoor or combination). Strategies for coping with loneliness at the social, cognitive, and behavioral levels were also identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The present study identified the most effective components of loneliness interventions in reducing loneliness among older adults. Findings offer important insights for practice and policy-making on potential strategies that can be used to reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 3","pages":"Article 105441"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions to Reduce Loneliness among Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Network Meta-analysis and Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Yinghui Sun MD ,&nbsp;Haiyou Huang BM ,&nbsp;Guangyun Cai MD ,&nbsp;Jing Gu PhD ,&nbsp;Gordon K.L. Leung MD ,&nbsp;Yanxiao Gao PhD ,&nbsp;Samuel Y.S. Wong PhD ,&nbsp;Eliza L.Y. Wong PhD ,&nbsp;Winnie W.S. Mak PhD ,&nbsp;Timothy Kwok PhD ,&nbsp;Phoenix K.H. Mo PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in reducing loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Interventional studies were included if they contained original quantitative data on interventions to reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults. Qualitative studies were included if they contained views on loneliness coping strategies or intervention evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six English databases and 3 Chinese databases were searched for studies published before August 2023. We extracted mean and standard deviation for the NMA to examine the overall effectiveness and efficacy of different interventions on loneliness. Thematic analysis was used to derive perspectives on coping strategies to mitigate loneliness.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-six quantitative studies with 6049 participants and 40 qualitative studies with 1095 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled effect size was large and significant [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.95; 95% CI, −1.32 to −0.58; <em>P</em> &lt; .001], indicating a strong effect of interventions in reducing loneliness. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in effect sizes by study region and health risk. Results of the NMA suggested interventions seem to be most effective when having psychosocial interventions as the content, a combination of individual and group as the delivery mode, and a mixture of face-to-face and online methods as the contact mode. Findings of the qualitative synthesis revealed 2 main dimensions of activities for reducing loneliness, including delivery modes (individual or group or combination) and settings (indoor or outdoor or combination). Strategies for coping with loneliness at the social, cognitive, and behavioral levels were also identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>The present study identified the most effective components of loneliness interventions in reducing loneliness among older adults. Findings offer important insights for practice and policy-making on potential strategies that can be used to reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 105441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估干预措施在减少社区居住老年人孤独感方面的有效性。设计:网络荟萃分析(NMA)和系统评价。环境和参与者:如果介入研究包含了减少社区居住老年人孤独感的干预措施的原始定量数据,则将其纳入。如果质性研究包含对孤独应对策略或干预评估的看法,则纳入研究。方法:检索2023年8月前发表的6个英文数据库和3个中文数据库。我们提取了NMA的均值和标准差异(sd),以检验不同干预措施对孤独感的总体有效性和疗效。本研究采用主题分析的方法,探讨缓解孤独感的应对策略。结果:纳入46项定量研究6049人,40项定性研究1095人。合并效应量大且显著(标准化平均差[SMD], -0.95;95% CI, -1.32 ~ -0.58;P < 0.001),表明干预措施在减少孤独感方面有很强的效果。亚组分析显示,不同研究区域和健康风险的效应大小存在显著差异。NMA的结果表明,当以社会心理干预为内容,以个人和团体相结合的传递模式,以及面对面和在线方法相结合的联系模式时,干预措施似乎是最有效的。定性综合的发现揭示了减少孤独感的活动的两个主要维度,包括交付模式(个人或团体或组合)和环境(室内或室外或组合)。还确定了在社会、认知和行为层面应对孤独的策略。结论和意义:本研究确定了减少老年人孤独感的最有效的干预成分。研究结果为实践和政策制定提供了重要见解,可用于减少社区居住老年人的孤独感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions to Reduce Loneliness among Community-dwelling Older Adults: A Network Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in reducing loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.

Design

A network meta-analysis (NMA) and systematic review.

Setting and Participants

Interventional studies were included if they contained original quantitative data on interventions to reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults. Qualitative studies were included if they contained views on loneliness coping strategies or intervention evaluation.

Methods

Six English databases and 3 Chinese databases were searched for studies published before August 2023. We extracted mean and standard deviation for the NMA to examine the overall effectiveness and efficacy of different interventions on loneliness. Thematic analysis was used to derive perspectives on coping strategies to mitigate loneliness.

Results

Forty-six quantitative studies with 6049 participants and 40 qualitative studies with 1095 participants were included in the analysis. The pooled effect size was large and significant [standardized mean difference (SMD), −0.95; 95% CI, −1.32 to −0.58; P < .001], indicating a strong effect of interventions in reducing loneliness. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in effect sizes by study region and health risk. Results of the NMA suggested interventions seem to be most effective when having psychosocial interventions as the content, a combination of individual and group as the delivery mode, and a mixture of face-to-face and online methods as the contact mode. Findings of the qualitative synthesis revealed 2 main dimensions of activities for reducing loneliness, including delivery modes (individual or group or combination) and settings (indoor or outdoor or combination). Strategies for coping with loneliness at the social, cognitive, and behavioral levels were also identified.

Conclusions and Implications

The present study identified the most effective components of loneliness interventions in reducing loneliness among older adults. Findings offer important insights for practice and policy-making on potential strategies that can be used to reduce loneliness among community-dwelling older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Pharmacists Improving Osteoporosis Management in Long-Term Care Using Fracture Risk Assessments: A Feasibility Study Postural Sway Characteristics Distinguish Types of Dementia Effectiveness of Telehealth Interventions on Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Adults With Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Sex-Specific Body Composition Profile Determined by Pelvic Computed Tomography Associated with Mortality in Older Patients with Hip Fracture Factors Influencing Initial Rehabilitation Type After Hip Fracture Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1