替代性脑深部刺激治疗孤立性肌张力障碍综合征:一项多中心经验调查。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1002/mdc3.14324
Laura Cif, Patricia Limousin, Zohra Souei, Marwan Hariz, Joachim K Krauss
{"title":"替代性脑深部刺激治疗孤立性肌张力障碍综合征:一项多中心经验调查。","authors":"Laura Cif, Patricia Limousin, Zohra Souei, Marwan Hariz, Joachim K Krauss","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the traditional evidence-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for treating dystonia. Although patients with isolated \"primary\" dystonia respond best to GPi-DBS, some are primary or secondary nonresponders (improvement <25%), showing variability in clinical response.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to survey current practices regarding alternative DBS targets for isolated dystonia patients with focus on nonresponders to GPi-DBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 42-question survey was emailed and distributed during a DBS conference to clinicians involved in DBS for dystonia. The survey covered (1) use of alternative DBS targets as primary or rescue options, (2) target selection based on dystonia phenomenology, (3) experience with secondary nonresponders to GPi-DBS, and (4) management of patients with additional DBS leads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 53.8%, including neurologists and neurosurgeons from 28 DBS centers in 13 countries; 89% of neurologists and 86% of neurosurgeons used alternative DBS targets to GPi, with subthalamic nucleus being the most common initial or rescue alternative to GPi. Patients with additional tremor received DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus or caudal zona incerta. Individual experience ranged from 5 to 25 patients. Most patients were still receiving dual target stimulation at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show that more than 85% of surveyed clinicians use alternative DBS targets, mostly in some isolated dystonia patients not adequately responsive to GPi-DBS. More knowledge is needed to evaluate outcomes in alternative targets and establish the best strategies for managing insufficient GPi-DBS response in dystonia patients with diverse phenomenology. Our article contributes to establishing a clearer time frame and criteria for defining nonresponders in dystonia patients undergoing DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Deep Brain Stimulation Targets in the Treatment of Isolated Dystonic Syndromes: A Multicenter Experience-Based Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Cif, Patricia Limousin, Zohra Souei, Marwan Hariz, Joachim K Krauss\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the traditional evidence-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for treating dystonia. Although patients with isolated \\\"primary\\\" dystonia respond best to GPi-DBS, some are primary or secondary nonresponders (improvement <25%), showing variability in clinical response.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to survey current practices regarding alternative DBS targets for isolated dystonia patients with focus on nonresponders to GPi-DBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 42-question survey was emailed and distributed during a DBS conference to clinicians involved in DBS for dystonia. The survey covered (1) use of alternative DBS targets as primary or rescue options, (2) target selection based on dystonia phenomenology, (3) experience with secondary nonresponders to GPi-DBS, and (4) management of patients with additional DBS leads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 53.8%, including neurologists and neurosurgeons from 28 DBS centers in 13 countries; 89% of neurologists and 86% of neurosurgeons used alternative DBS targets to GPi, with subthalamic nucleus being the most common initial or rescue alternative to GPi. Patients with additional tremor received DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus or caudal zona incerta. Individual experience ranged from 5 to 25 patients. Most patients were still receiving dual target stimulation at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show that more than 85% of surveyed clinicians use alternative DBS targets, mostly in some isolated dystonia patients not adequately responsive to GPi-DBS. More knowledge is needed to evaluate outcomes in alternative targets and establish the best strategies for managing insufficient GPi-DBS response in dystonia patients with diverse phenomenology. Our article contributes to establishing a clearer time frame and criteria for defining nonresponders in dystonia patients undergoing DBS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内苍白球(GPi)是传统的基于证据的深部脑刺激(DBS)治疗肌张力障碍的靶点。虽然孤立性“原发性”肌张力障碍患者对GPi-DBS反应最好,但有些患者是原发性或继发性无反应(改善目的:目的是调查目前关于孤立性肌张力障碍患者对GPi-DBS无反应的替代DBS靶点的实践。方法:一份42个问题的调查通过电子邮件发送,并在DBS会议期间分发给参与DBS治疗肌张力障碍的临床医生。该调查涵盖了(1)DBS替代靶点作为主要或抢救选择的使用,(2)基于肌张力障碍现象的靶点选择,(3)GPi-DBS继发性无反应的经验,以及(4)额外DBS导联患者的管理。结果:应答率为53.8%,包括来自13个国家28个DBS中心的神经科医生和神经外科医生;89%的神经科医生和86%的神经外科医生使用DBS替代GPi靶点,其中丘脑下核是GPi最常见的初始或抢救替代靶点。伴有额外震颤的患者在腹侧中间核或尾侧间带接受DBS。个体经验范围从5到25个病人。大多数患者在最后一次随访时仍在接受双靶刺激。结论:我们发现,超过85%的受访临床医生使用替代DBS靶点,主要用于一些孤立的肌张力障碍患者,这些患者对GPi-DBS反应不足。需要更多的知识来评估替代目标的结果,并建立管理具有不同现象的肌张力障碍患者GPi-DBS反应不足的最佳策略。我们的文章有助于建立更清晰的时间框架和标准来定义肌张力障碍患者接受DBS的无反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternative Deep Brain Stimulation Targets in the Treatment of Isolated Dystonic Syndromes: A Multicenter Experience-Based Survey.

Background: The globus pallidus internus (GPi) is the traditional evidence-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) target for treating dystonia. Although patients with isolated "primary" dystonia respond best to GPi-DBS, some are primary or secondary nonresponders (improvement <25%), showing variability in clinical response.

Objective: The aim was to survey current practices regarding alternative DBS targets for isolated dystonia patients with focus on nonresponders to GPi-DBS.

Methods: A 42-question survey was emailed and distributed during a DBS conference to clinicians involved in DBS for dystonia. The survey covered (1) use of alternative DBS targets as primary or rescue options, (2) target selection based on dystonia phenomenology, (3) experience with secondary nonresponders to GPi-DBS, and (4) management of patients with additional DBS leads.

Results: The response rate was 53.8%, including neurologists and neurosurgeons from 28 DBS centers in 13 countries; 89% of neurologists and 86% of neurosurgeons used alternative DBS targets to GPi, with subthalamic nucleus being the most common initial or rescue alternative to GPi. Patients with additional tremor received DBS in the ventral intermediate nucleus or caudal zona incerta. Individual experience ranged from 5 to 25 patients. Most patients were still receiving dual target stimulation at the last follow-up.

Conclusions: We show that more than 85% of surveyed clinicians use alternative DBS targets, mostly in some isolated dystonia patients not adequately responsive to GPi-DBS. More knowledge is needed to evaluate outcomes in alternative targets and establish the best strategies for managing insufficient GPi-DBS response in dystonia patients with diverse phenomenology. Our article contributes to establishing a clearer time frame and criteria for defining nonresponders in dystonia patients undergoing DBS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
期刊最新文献
CAPRIN1 Pro512Leu Variant Causes Childhood Dementia, Myoclonus-Ataxia, and Sensorimotor Neuropathy. Dynamic Video Assessment of Axial Postural Abnormalities in Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Study. Longitudinal Changes in Patient- and Clinical-Reported Outcomes in Early Spinocerebellar Ataxia Types 1, 2, 3, and 6 from the IDEA Study. A Short Cognitive and Neuropsychiatric Assessment Scale for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Short-Term Effects of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Treating a Young Patient Affected by Post-Ischemic Hemidystonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1